Is Christopher Rufo a political hero?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No he is a raging A-hole.

What??? How do you figure?

Well, the broad fiction about CRT being taught in K-12 was pretty evil.

Was he unequivocally proved wrong?

You can’t prove a negative. It was never a thing. It was a complete fabrication. It isn’t a question of proving him wrong — he never proved his claim.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People will never give him the credit but the beauty of the situation is that he doesn't even want it.

Bullsh*t! He wants all the glory. He doesn't deserve any credit. He is a fraud.

Not for nothing, but isn’t Gay the actual literal fraud in this story?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People will never give him the credit but the beauty of the situation is that he doesn't even want it.

Bullsh*t! He wants all the glory. He doesn't deserve any credit. He is a fraud.

Not for nothing, but isn’t Gay the actual literal fraud in this story?

I think they are still considered allegations. I’m not sure if she has admitted to wrongdoing.

[Anonymous]

No, he is trash OP. Is he your MAGA king?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No, he is trash OP. Is he your MAGA king?

No he is def not

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is Georgetown and Harvard alum Christopher Rufo a political hero?

Future Politician?

No. He is just a provocateur and really evil.

+1

POS

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People will never give him the credit but the beauty of the situation is that he doesn't even want it.

Bullsh*t! He wants all the glory. He doesn't deserve any credit. He is a fraud.

Not for nothing, but isn’t Gay the actual literal fraud in this story?

I think they are still considered allegations. I’m not sure if she has admitted to wrongdoing.

????
She has to admit wrongdoing in order for the allegations to be proven? It doesn't work that way.
Examples of her plagiarism has been shown side-by-side with the works of the original author.
I would say that makes the accusations no longer just allegations but proof.

[Anonymous]

He creates chaos to attract attention to himself. It's so obvious that it's pathetic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He creates chaos to attract attention to himself. It's so obvious that it's pathetic.

But wasn’t he the person who exposed Dr. Gay for alleged plagiarism?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He creates chaos to attract attention to himself. It's so obvious that it's pathetic.

But wasn’t he the person who exposed Dr. Gay for alleged plagiarism?

No.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He creates chaos to attract attention to himself. It's so obvious that it's pathetic.

But wasn’t he the person who exposed Dr. Gay for alleged plagiarism?

No that was the pro Israel partisans. For some reason those people have made common cause with neo Nazis. Don’t think it will end well for either one of them.

[Anonymous]

He gives me cuck vibes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He gives me cuck vibes.

This??:
“One definition of "cuckservative" is someone who is associated with the right-wing politics in contemporary America but also opposes white supremacy.[12] According to Richard B. Spencer,[13] a white supremacist, the term is a shorthand used to express "a certain kind of contempt for conservatives".[14]”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuckservative

[Anonymous]

He is definitely having a moment

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He creates chaos to attract attention to himself. It's so obvious that it's pathetic.

But wasn’t he the person who exposed Dr. Gay for alleged plagiarism?

No.

Actually he was.