The middle school algebra proficiency seems to be from 55 - 70% (70 at TPMS) |
This. None of which is benefitting our kids. |
What are the chances this information shows up in this week’s ‘5 Things You Should Know’ email that MCPS likes to send out? I mean, this is certainly something I would like to know as a parent. |
|
MCAP is problematic. It may be Maryland's state specific test, but it is still modeled on PARCC and created by Pearson.
The test is a 90-minute, multipart slog through complicated multi-step problems. Not easy, and not within most kids' attention spans. These are not the standardized tests we took as kids where there were just dozens of normal math problems to solve. These questions have to be parsed to understand what math they're looking for. |
It is. I’m baffled people don’t understand this. For proof they can download released PARCC tests and MCAP tests. They are the same in style, content, and rigor. |
The algebra pass rate (level 3/4) at my kid's middle school is ~9.5%. Hoping my kid was one of those. It's so depressing to see the differences between schools. |
My fifth grader last year did 4 days of testing for MCAP math, with each day 40 mins. She has ADHD but did not seem bothered by the length. She would definitely have had a hard time sitting through 90 mins at once, but thankfully that is not how the test is set up. |
For the paper test: Math test is 4days, 40minutes per day. 160 minutes total. (I did it in my head in 30minutes, but I've had a lot of practice.) 40 questions total, including 2-parters. Some questions are "circle ALL answers that are true". 8-13 questions per day. (Longer section has easier simple questions.) So, about 4 minutes per question. 5 ask for showing work. The rest are answer-only, mostly multiple-choice, so you could take shortcuts using the choices as hints. Passing and High Passing scores allow for some (secret) number of mistakes, of course. About 2 questions per section are poorly worded but solvable. Questions are the same type as Eureka/IM workbook. Normal equation and word problems. They do require the modeling and manipulation and understanding the formulas from multiple angles, exactly as the yearlong workbook teaches. The grading scale is secret, but it should be easy to predict a student's raw score based on homework and test scores. It's summative (full yesr of content), so students who crammed for each module, but didn't learn, would score poorly. https://support.mdassessments.com/practice-tests/math/ https://support.mdassessments.com/resources/practice-tests/math/MD1126621_Gr10AlgI_PT.pdf |
Teachers and Admin need to prep for the onslaught of parent "feedback". |
Prep for what? The talking points are clear and already being deployed in this thread: The test is the problem. Not the instruction or the school management seems to be the main line of defense. They've been using that line for the last 5 years so there's really no need to prep, cause they don't have anything new to say. |
| What is passing guideline? 50% out of 100% or lower? |
It's not really an MCPS test but one the state just made up and has some issues. |
| I love how the rating system gives credit for a "well rounded curriculum" in several places. |
To put this in context, B-CC has a 8.5% proficiency rate, and Blair has a 6.6% rate, but both have a 5% rate for kids who receive FARMS. Walter Johnson's proficiency rate is 5.7% overall, and the Whitman rate is a whopping 12%. Basically, the math rates are not useful metrics for any school because it is *only* the Algebra I test. Your average "bright" MCPS kid takes that test in 7th grade. Your average grade level MCPS kids take that test in 8th. So the only kids taking that test in 9th grade or above are kids who were already below grade level. Some kids seem to be doing better than other, but whether that's due to the school or to parents pushing in supports/tutoring for kids with learning differences, the numbers are just going to be low across the board. |