July 1 - legal pot in Maryland

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wonderful.
The whole county’s going go smell like skunk.

I’m more concerned with the smell of blood after school shootings, but hey, we all have our concerns.

Your concern is low incidence, high consequence.

The smell of cannabis is high incidence, low consequence.

Treat accordingly.

And how would you categorize the effects on children’s development when their parents are smoking around them?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Really feel bad for all the apartment and town home residents.

This. You people stink.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Weed is the classic example of "to each his own"

Until you live somewhere with shared walls and your weed smoke permeates my apartment or townhouse. Vomitous.

This.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wonderful.
The whole county’s going go smell like skunk.

I’m more concerned with the smell of blood after school shootings, but hey, we all have our concerns.

Your concern is low incidence, high consequence.

The smell of cannabis is high incidence, low consequence.

Treat accordingly.

And how would you categorize the effects on children’s development when their parents are smoking around them?

Same as alcohol. Don’t get totally wasted in front of the kids but a couple of beers or a joint if you prefer in your backyard is just fine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not me. I’ve never understood someone deliberately impairing their own thinking processes (except when necessary for a specific purpose, ex. anesthesia before surgery). If I’m happy, I want a clear head to enjoy it. If I’m having troubles, I want a clear head to confront them. Either way, I want to feel like me.

+1 but prepare for the pot-lovers of DCUM to leap down your throat.

Funny how three pages later nobody even cares if the pp doesn’t use cannabis yet every time the subject comes up there are a dozen posts by the anti-pot brigade that need to tell us how horrible cannabis is.

[Anonymous]

I was just in Europe and the smell of hash - infinitely preferable to weed--was so much less prevalent in the streets. In DC the smell is horrible and intrusive everywhere. Pot smokers are so incredibly selfish, and their bud stinks and they stink. Literally. Their breath, clothes, cars smell like *ss. I feel sorry for MD.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I was just in Europe and the smell of hash - infinitely preferable to weed--was so much less prevalent in the streets. In DC the smell is horrible and intrusive everywhere. Pot smokers are so incredibly selfish, and their bud stinks and they stink. Literally. Their breath, clothes, cars smell like *ss. I feel sorry for MD.

Hash = cannabis.
Weed = cannabis.
Pot = cannabis.
Bud = cannabis.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I was just in Europe and the smell of hash - infinitely preferable to weed--was so much less prevalent in the streets. In DC the smell is horrible and intrusive everywhere. Pot smokers are so incredibly selfish, and their bud stinks and they stink. Literally. Their breath, clothes, cars smell like *ss. I feel sorry for MD.

Sucks to be you

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wonderful.
The whole county’s going go smell like skunk.

I’m more concerned with the smell of blood after school shootings, but hey, we all have our concerns.

Your concern is low incidence, high consequence.

The smell of cannabis is high incidence, low consequence.

Treat accordingly.

And how would you categorize the effects on children’s development when their parents are smoking around them?

Same as alcohol. Don’t get totally wasted in front of the kids but a couple of beers or a joint if you prefer in your backyard is just fine.

It’s not the same as alcohol. No matter how much an adult drinks around a child, the child won’t get drunk unless they also drink.

Also, your response to the question did not address the question. According to the earlier poster’s classification scheme, would you consider exposing a child (who by definition is still developing) to secondhand marijuana smoke as high/low incidence and high/low consequence? Keep in mind, not everyone has a backyard, or will limit their smoking to one, even if they do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
It’s not the same as alcohol. No matter how much an adult drinks around a child, the child won’t get drunk unless they also drink.

Also, your response to the question did not address the question. According to the earlier poster’s classification scheme, would you consider exposing a child (who by definition is still developing) to secondhand marijuana smoke as high/low incidence and high/low consequence? Keep in mind, not everyone has a backyard, or will limit their smoking to one, even if they do.

Nobody cares. It is extremely common for drunks to beat their kids. It is extremely uncommon for people high on cannabis to beat anyone. REMINDER: There is an exception to every rule.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It’s not the same as alcohol. No matter how much an adult drinks around a child, the child won’t get drunk unless they also drink.

Also, your response to the question did not address the question. According to the earlier poster’s classification scheme, would you consider exposing a child (who by definition is still developing) to secondhand marijuana smoke as high/low incidence and high/low consequence? Keep in mind, not everyone has a backyard, or will limit their smoking to one, even if they do.

Nobody cares. It is extremely common for drunks to beat their kids. It is extremely uncommon for people high on cannabis to beat anyone. REMINDER: There is an exception to every rule.

They may not be beating their child, but are they providing adequate care and supervision? Moreover, you still haven’t addressed the brain damage and other health consequences they’re inflicting on their child by exposing them to secondhand smoke while they’re still developing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It’s not the same as alcohol. No matter how much an adult drinks around a child, the child won’t get drunk unless they also drink.

Also, your response to the question did not address the question. According to the earlier poster’s classification scheme, would you consider exposing a child (who by definition is still developing) to secondhand marijuana smoke as high/low incidence and high/low consequence? Keep in mind, not everyone has a backyard, or will limit their smoking to one, even if they do.

Nobody cares. It is extremely common for drunks to beat their kids. It is extremely uncommon for people high on cannabis to beat anyone. REMINDER: There is an exception to every rule.

They may not be beating their child, but are they providing adequate care and supervision? Moreover, you still haven’t addressed the brain damage and other health consequences they’re inflicting on their child by exposing them to secondhand smoke while they’re still developing.

DP. Are drunks providing adequate care and supervision? I'm with the PP. I've met people who were angry, violent drunks. I've never met an angry, violent pothead.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It’s not the same as alcohol. No matter how much an adult drinks around a child, the child won’t get drunk unless they also drink.

Also, your response to the question did not address the question. According to the earlier poster’s classification scheme, would you consider exposing a child (who by definition is still developing) to secondhand marijuana smoke as high/low incidence and high/low consequence? Keep in mind, not everyone has a backyard, or will limit their smoking to one, even if they do.

Nobody cares. It is extremely common for drunks to beat their kids. It is extremely uncommon for people high on cannabis to beat anyone. REMINDER: There is an exception to every rule.

They may not be beating their child, but are they providing adequate care and supervision? Moreover, you still haven’t addressed the brain damage and other health consequences they’re inflicting on their child by exposing them to secondhand smoke while they’re still developing.

DP. Are drunks providing adequate care and supervision? I'm with the PP. I've met people who were angry, violent drunks. I've never met an angry, violent pothead.

The question isn’t if drunks make good parents, or even if they are worse than marijuana users. The fact that one group of parents is generally worse than another doesn’t make the lesser evil acceptable. However, none of this addresses my original question:

According to the earlier poster’s classification scheme, would you consider exposing a child (who by definition is still developing) to secondhand marijuana smoke as high/low incidence and high/low consequence?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not me. I’ve never understood someone deliberately impairing their own thinking processes (except when necessary for a specific purpose, ex. anesthesia before surgery). If I’m happy, I want a clear head to enjoy it. If I’m having troubles, I want a clear head to confront them. Either way, I want to feel like me.

+10000 well said.

[Anonymous]

This was absolutely amazing weekend. Will never forget. It. Bought 100% level weed and H and I stayed high Af all weekend. Love Maryland. Peace out