The NCAA has a “hot girl” problem

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I have seen the angst of some posters here about the "changing landscape" in college admissions. While I know this thread is not about college admissions, would you not be proud of your kids making MILLIONS of dollars of the NIL? Especially if your kids were not accepted to T-25 schools?

Some have said they "look so old". I guess 6.5 million followers plus don't think that way.

Good for all these kids making real, honest money doing these things. I don't think I could have done it back when I was in college,

And to those that crap on recruited athletes, I truly believe you do not understand the potential for these kids to have enormous paydays for their work.

If I was offered a guaranteed $50 million contract after my Junior year in college, I would jump at it.


They aren’t on onlyfans

You wouldn’t have modeled your way to seven figures a year in college if you could?

None of these girls have done anything even partially nude as far as I know
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I almost spit up my cokie cola when she said "we are 22 year old girls." When I saw their pictures and then read they are retired NCAA players, I thought they played in the 90s cause they look 44 years old, not 22!


I thought so too!! They look SO OLD. Overly tanned and haggard.


It’s because they are from Arizona and are former d1 athletes but are LDS so their genetics is mostly from England/Scandinavia (not much sunlight up there and lots of moisture in the air).

too much Sun for their genes and too much weight training/protein shakes.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:This isn’t new. Good looking women athletes have always gotten more endorsements even if they aren’t the best at their sports.

People like looking at pretty blondes in bikinis. Brand new information. Good for the twins for making it work for them.


People used to compare Anna Kornakova to the Williams sisters to make that point. Doesn’t anyone want to compare career off the court earnings now?
Anonymous
I don’t see the problem. Make that money while you can.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry, what is the point of this? Blonde twins who like to wear bikinis make a lot of money on social media - yeah, so?
Least surprising thing ever. Are you new here?


What's funny is the girls are honestly somewhat ugly on video. They use a lot of filters and angles and bleached hair to look like bombshells but outside of fit bodies, their faces are very mediocre.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I almost spit up my cokie cola when she said "we are 22 year old girls." When I saw their pictures and then read they are retired NCAA players, I thought they played in the 90s cause they look 44 years old, not 22!


I thought so too!! They look SO OLD. Overly tanned and haggard.


It’s because they are from Arizona and are former d1 athletes but are LDS so their genetics is mostly from England/Scandinavia (not much sunlight up there and lots of moisture in the air).

too much Sun for their genes and too much weight training/protein shakes.


I doubt it's sun damage at age 22. They just don't have attractive faces. It is very very rare to see GENUINELY cute female basketball players in d1. They are generally very muscular and masculine looking.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I almost spit up my cokie cola when she said "we are 22 year old girls." When I saw their pictures and then read they are retired NCAA players, I thought they played in the 90s cause they look 44 years old, not 22!


I thought so too!! They look SO OLD. Overly tanned and haggard.


Same. I googled them wondering if the article just did them dirty, and found some cuter, fresh faced pictures, but they mostly looked the same. They need to stop drinking/smoking and invest in sunscreen.

But kudos to them on having a successful business model. Way richer than I will ever be.


Nobody's face is ruined at age 22 by sun and booze. They were born ugly. If they didn't play basketball nobody would give a damn about these girls. Dime a dozen.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Good for them. I wish I could make $2 million a year for posting on TiKTok.

It's odd the article didn't mention Olivia Dunne from LSU. She is the top female NIL earner with $3.2 million.

The crazy thing is to top two in revenue from NIL deals is Bronny James ($7.6 million) and Arch Manning ($3.7 million). Neither one of them have even played a single game in college.


I don’t understand why they’re so popular. Must be the twin thing. I mean, they’re attractive, but not outrageously so. Olivia Dunne OTOH makes perfect sense to me.
Anonymous
That Livvy gal at LSU is very pretty. These gals are frankly legitimately ugly.

Anonymous
Amazing how quickly this thread has turned into comments about how ugly these girls are. Would love to see a selfie of the people making these comments.
Anonymous
They literally look like dudes. And they sound like dudes on their podcast.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Amazing how quickly this thread has turned into comments about how ugly these girls are. Would love to see a selfie of the people making these comments.


The "beauties" of DCUM are always quick to put down any woman who is younger or prettier than they are.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Amazing how quickly this thread has turned into comments about how ugly these girls are. Would love to see a selfie of the people making these comments.


The "beauties" of DCUM are always quick to put down any woman who is younger or prettier than they are.


NP. These women are putting themselves out there for their looks and earning millions doing it. We’re allowed to comment on the quality of those looks just as much as we are on the quality of their basket ball playing.

In my opinion, their faces look old and homely but more power to them for using what they have.
Anonymous
I’m all for it. Get the money.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:That Livvy gal at LSU is very pretty. These gals are frankly legitimately ugly.



Jersey girls are the best!

post reply Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: