This seems like an odd thing to say and yes, people are buying what they can safely afford. You're not making enough to comfortably afford a $1.5M home. Could you just go for it? Sure. Would that be foolish? Yep. |
Big law, at least for many. |
Doctor |
+1 |
Is this OP? How much equity do you have in your current place? I think it's strange you have a full-time nanny, and expensive daycare, and 2+ kids but have just paid off your student loans on $550-600k/year HHI, and are apparently just now getting on the property ladder? Don't get me wrong, I had ~$200k in student loans, but you seem to be doing things in a strange order here. I think plenty of people making half a million take out mortgages for $700k, yes. That does not mean that's the value of the house they're purchasing. |
That was me. We’ve never owned a home. We’ve lived in different cities for various reasons and didn’t want to buy until we knew we would stay. We paid off student loans a few years ago (was just explaining why we haven’t saved enough to make a huge down payment). I’m not sure what you mean by expensive daycare, we need childcare so we do daycare and have a nanny for the baby until she’s older enough for daycare. Ah you mean 700k mortgage - I agree. I meant a 700k house. |
| As a rule of thumb, housing costs should be no more than roughly 33.33% of your take-home pay. So, is your take-home in the neighborhood of $30K? |
|
Why not ask a more intelligent question: What kind of house do I actually need that I can actually afford?
|
When you already have a full-time nanny, daycare for the older kid is an optional extra expense you've decided to have. A nanny is childcare, and babies can go to daycare. You're choosing the most expensive option for each kid, while and mixing and matching to maximize expense. Based on these facts, it's really hard to believe that 1) your kids will go to public school, and 2) you're "not big spenders." Aim to spend no more than 1/3 of your take home income on PITI. You have multiple kids to send to college. |
OP here. That’s an interesting perspective. I’d think a 3 year old and especially a 4 year old would benefit greatly from the socialization and structure of daycare. I can’t imagine that a nanny could nurture them properly while having their hands full with an infant. Yes I plan on sending my kids to public school. Childcare isn’t free before then so I pay for it… |
OP, we were similar to you a few years ago. Had lived in a very HCOL city prior to DC and hadn't bought until moving here, and were balancing childcare for 2 kids. People on here just love to jump all over high earners. I don't think your childcare situation is unusual (we have a nanny and 2 kids in part time preschool--this is common). Also agree a lot of people making $500k+ are buying homes in the $1.5 range. FWIW we take home $30k/month before factoring in bonuses, and are comfortable with our $8k PITI. Have you tracked your spending for a few months to know your actual burn? That will be much more accurate than trying to predict future expenses because it's very easy not to factor in the "one-time" expenses that seem to come up every month (the expensive dental bill, the last minute flight when there's a family emergency across the country, etc.). |
Sure. So send the baby to daycare too. You've made some financially less than optimal decisions, OP. Paying off very low interest student loans rather than saving/investing. Having three kids (I realize that's much more than a financial decision, but is also *is* a financial decision). Don't compound them by extending yourself too far on a house. |
NP. I'd point out they said their *mortgage* was $4200, not that it was the PITI. my payment on 1.4m is $5600, but taxes and insurance are separate. our PITI averages out to around $7100 for a now-approximately $2m house, HHI is ~$400k. |
Wow, so much judgment and so many assumptions! 1. I have 2 kids. 2. The baby is literally too young for daycare right now as in daycares don’t take babies that young. Plus I don’t just pick the cheapest childcare option possible since I actually care about their well being. 3. You don’t know what the interest on the loans are and I don’t see anything wrong with paying them off and being debt free if you can. |
1. You wrote, "I’d think a 3 year old and especially a 4 year old would benefit greatly from the socialization and structure of daycare." Not sure how anyone is supposed to understand that you are talking about one child. 2. If the nanny is such a short-term expense, you shouldn't have included it for consideration. 3. You're right, I don't know the interest rates - what were they? I do know that we are coming out of an extended period of historically low rates. There's nothing intrinsically wrong with paying off low interest debt, but it's undisputed that it isn't financially optimal. That's compounded, in your case, by the fact that you cleared low-interest debt and now have to take on much higher interest debt in order to buy a house. |