Twitter removes, then reinstates Florida Surgeon General's Covid vaccine warning tweet

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://twitter.com/flsurgeongen/status/1578515633159180289?s=46&t=WL_zrOTp0uvN8lrJuUecdw

Was Twitter in the right to delete this? I’m undecided as I don’t have a science background.

I dont think you have to have a science background to decide whether twitter should censor the FL surgeon general.

Science changes. Thats the whole point of scientific research. To test and validate what we know, while making discoveries to enhance our knowledge. Twitter is anti science because they oppose the discussion and inquiry necessary to improve our body of knowledge.

I wonder why Florida has experienced a much higher overall death rate than more highly vaccinated states during the post-vaccine pandemic year. I'm sure there's a scientific answer to that.

Oh you know more than the experts?

Anti science smh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trash “science” for armchair experts who believe they are equipped to “do their own research.”

Are they stopping people from getting the injections?

That are known not to stop one from getting or spreading the virus?

For which manufacturers have no liability if said experimental shots are later shown to cause long term damage or death?

As long as they aren’t preventing people from exercising their rights to participate in the trial for this new cocktail there’s no need for you to get your panties in a bunch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trash “science” for armchair experts who believe they are equipped to “do their own research.”

Are they stopping people from getting the injections?

That are known not to stop one from getting or spreading the virus?

For which manufacturers have no liability if said experimental shots are later shown to cause long term damage or death?

As long as they aren’t preventing people from exercising their rights to participate in the trial for this new cocktail there’s no need for you to get your panties in a bunch.

People who don’t fundamentally understand how a vaccine functions should refrain from parroting nonsense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://twitter.com/flsurgeongen/status/1578515633159180289?s=46&t=WL_zrOTp0uvN8lrJuUecdw

Was Twitter in the right to delete this? I’m undecided as I don’t have a science background.

I dont think you have to have a science background to decide whether twitter should censor the FL surgeon general.

Science changes. Thats the whole point of scientific research. To test and validate what we know, while making discoveries to enhance our knowledge. Twitter is anti science because they oppose the discussion and inquiry necessary to improve our body of knowledge.

I wonder why Florida has experienced a much higher overall death rate than more highly vaccinated states during the post-vaccine pandemic year. I'm sure there's a scientific answer to that.

Oh you know more than the experts?

Anti science smh.

Nope, I'm looking at charts made by scientists at the CDC. Why are you ignoring them? Anti-sciene smh.

[Anonymous]

Of course they should not censor him. Twitter should not be in the business of censoring speech, period.

Myocarditis is a real thing. This age group is not at high risk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Of course they should not censor him. Twitter should not be in the business of censoring speech, period.

Myocarditis is a real thing. This age group is not at high risk.

Twitter can censor hate speech. Disinformation. Anything it likes. If DeSantis wants to peddle lies he can stick to any of the ignorant white trash socisl media: GETTR, Rumble, Truth Social

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course they should not censor him. Twitter should not be in the business of censoring speech, period.

Myocarditis is a real thing. This age group is not at high risk.

Twitter can censor hate speech. Disinformation. Anything it likes. If DeSantis wants to peddle lies he can stick to any of the ignorant white trash socisl media: GETTR, Rumble, Truth Social

This is why Elon wants Twitter. Not because its a good investment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://twitter.com/flsurgeongen/status/1578515633159180289?s=46&t=WL_zrOTp0uvN8lrJuUecdw

Was Twitter in the right to delete this? I’m undecided as I don’t have a science background.

I dont think you have to have a science background to decide whether twitter should censor the FL surgeon general.

Science changes. Thats the whole point of scientific research. To test and validate what we know, while making discoveries to enhance our knowledge. Twitter is anti science because they oppose the discussion and inquiry necessary to improve our body of knowledge.

I wonder why Florida has experienced a much higher overall death rate than more highly vaccinated states during the post-vaccine pandemic year. I'm sure there's a scientific answer to that.

Oh you know more than the experts?

Anti science smh.

Nope, I'm looking at charts made by scientists at the CDC. Why are you ignoring them? Anti-sciene smh.

NP. Just from a casual glance, it looks like Florida is within one or two standard deviations of the mean for the US. Obviously, having a bit more data would help narrow down the variance. So that data looks normal for any large population study. Everyone isn't going to be average.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://twitter.com/flsurgeongen/status/1578515633159180289?s=46&t=WL_zrOTp0uvN8lrJuUecdw

Was Twitter in the right to delete this? I’m undecided as I don’t have a science background.

I dont think you have to have a science background to decide whether twitter should censor the FL surgeon general.

Science changes. Thats the whole point of scientific research. To test and validate what we know, while making discoveries to enhance our knowledge. Twitter is anti science because they oppose the discussion and inquiry necessary to improve our body of knowledge.

I wonder why Florida has experienced a much higher overall death rate than more highly vaccinated states during the post-vaccine pandemic year. I'm sure there's a scientific answer to that.

Oh you know more than the experts?

Anti science smh.

Nope, I'm looking at charts made by scientists at the CDC. Why are you ignoring them? Anti-sciene smh.

NP. Just from a casual glance, it looks like Florida is within one or two standard deviations of the mean for the US. Obviously, having a bit more data would help narrow down the variance. So that data looks normal for any large population study. Everyone isn't going to be average.

Shark attacks explains the difference.

[Anonymous]

I’m pro vaccine and am Covid-vaxxed and boosted, but I’m getting tired of the censorship and gaslighting that there are people out there who did get severely injured or died from this vaccine. It happens. Side effects and deaths have occurred in numerous treatments in the past. But the fact that we can’t have an open conversation about THIS vaccine, is incredibly annoying and dishonest.

Why on earth are random tech people on Twitter who have no medical knowledge deciding on health information anyway?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m pro vaccine and am Covid-vaxxed and boosted, but I’m getting tired of the censorship and gaslighting that there are people out there who did get severely injured or died from this vaccine. It happens. Side effects and deaths have occurred in numerous treatments in the past. But the fact that we can’t have an open conversation about THIS vaccine, is incredibly annoying and dishonest.

Why on earth are random tech people on Twitter who have no medical knowledge deciding on health information anyway?

Additionally, who is telling them to do this? And you’re right, why THIS vaccine?

This is not just a bunch of random tech people deciding to do this on their own.

[Anonymous]

I am old enough to know that being pro-free speech and anti-corporate media used to be central tenets on the left side of the aisle. Now, these same types demand that limits on speech that must be imposed by big corporations.

Demand? I guess some do. But I think most want private companies to have the ability to keep disinformation off of their platforms. I thought private companies having control over their operations was a central tenet of the right. Now many on the right think 'freedom of speech' applies not just to the State, but to private enterprises as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://twitter.com/flsurgeongen/status/1578515633159180289?s=46&t=WL_zrOTp0uvN8lrJuUecdw

Was Twitter in the right to delete this? I’m undecided as I don’t have a science background.

I dont think you have to have a science background to decide whether twitter should censor the FL surgeon general.

Science changes. Thats the whole point of scientific research. To test and validate what we know, while making discoveries to enhance our knowledge. Twitter is anti science because they oppose the discussion and inquiry necessary to improve our body of knowledge.

I wonder why Florida has experienced a much higher overall death rate than more highly vaccinated states during the post-vaccine pandemic year. I'm sure there's a scientific answer to that.

Oh you know more than the experts?

Anti science smh.

Nope, I'm looking at charts made by scientists at the CDC. Why are you ignoring them? Anti-sciene smh.

NP. Just from a casual glance, it looks like Florida is within one or two standard deviations of the mean for the US. Obviously, having a bit more data would help narrow down the variance. So that data looks normal for any large population study. Everyone isn't going to be average.

But the Florida SG is claiming Florida had better results when they had provably worse results.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m pro vaccine and am Covid-vaxxed and boosted, but I’m getting tired of the censorship and gaslighting that there are people out there who did get severely injured or died from this vaccine. It happens. Side effects and deaths have occurred in numerous treatments in the past. But the fact that we can’t have an open conversation about THIS vaccine, is incredibly annoying and dishonest.

Why on earth are random tech people on Twitter who have no medical knowledge deciding on health information anyway?

Additionally, who is telling them to do this? And you’re right, why THIS vaccine?

This is not just a bunch of random tech people deciding to do this on their own.

You guys have it backwards. Why is this vaccine being attacked when the potential adverse effects are minimal when compared to the deaths and long-term consequences of the disease? This vaccine isn’t being defended irrationally, it’s being attacked irrationally by misinformation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://twitter.com/flsurgeongen/status/1578515633159180289?s=46&t=WL_zrOTp0uvN8lrJuUecdw

Was Twitter in the right to delete this? I’m undecided as I don’t have a science background.

I dont think you have to have a science background to decide whether twitter should censor the FL surgeon general.

Science changes. Thats the whole point of scientific research. To test and validate what we know, while making discoveries to enhance our knowledge. Twitter is anti science because they oppose the discussion and inquiry necessary to improve our body of knowledge.

I’m sure Twitter acted after it heard from legit scientists and experts that the FLSG’s post was dangerous disinformation. The SG is not interested in a good faith discussion.

It doesn’t matter if Twitter heard from “legit scientists and experts.” Those people can be and often are wrong, too. That is the whole point of science. It is not about specious appeals to authority, but rather rigorous, empirical testing. Even if the Florida surgeon general is completely wrong, what should happen is that he should be refuted with actual evidence. Not silenced for being incorrect.

The question is what it means to be silenced. Nobody is telling him he can’t post that crap on his own governmental website or give speeches about it or issue public notices or press releases. It does he have a right to spread that information as purported news on a social media website? That’s a different issue. This was all easier when newspapers had editorial control over what got passed on as fact. Now anyone with a Twitter handle can disseminate their own versions of fact and there is no moderation or baseline agreements regarding standards for publication. It is a problem. The answer is not to avoid any attempt to address the issue, as you seem to think.