Embryos are now considered "dependents" in GA for tax purposes

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is nuts.

I said a few weeks ago in another thread that it is going to be considered kidnapping with intent to kill if a pregnant woman crosses state lines to have an abortion.

People said I was overreacting, and that it was unconstitutional to prevent the right to travel.

I don't see how I was overreacting.

I'm just frankly amazed at how many people think it's ok to bar citizens from interstate travel, as if that's not something that was not a hallmark of the USSR and all other severely authoritarian regimes. And then for the same people to talk about freedom. The mental gymnastics hurt to watch.

No one thinks this. There are no proposals to restrict women from interstate travel. It's disinformation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is nuts.

I said a few weeks ago in another thread that it is going to be considered kidnapping with intent to kill if a pregnant woman crosses state lines to have an abortion.

People said I was overreacting, and that it was unconstitutional to prevent the right to travel.

I don't see how I was overreacting.

I'm just frankly amazed at how many people think it's ok to bar citizens from interstate travel, as if that's not something that was not a hallmark of the USSR and all other severely authoritarian regimes. And then for the same people to talk about freedom. The mental gymnastics hurt to watch.

No one thinks this. There are no proposals to restrict women from interstate travel. It's disinformation.

Why lie? There are multiple proposals to effectively do so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is nuts.

I said a few weeks ago in another thread that it is going to be considered kidnapping with intent to kill if a pregnant woman crosses state lines to have an abortion.

People said I was overreacting, and that it was unconstitutional to prevent the right to travel.

I don't see how I was overreacting.

I'm just frankly amazed at how many people think it's ok to bar citizens from interstate travel, as if that's not something that was not a hallmark of the USSR and all other severely authoritarian regimes. And then for the same people to talk about freedom. The mental gymnastics hurt to watch.

No one thinks this. There are no proposals to restrict women from interstate travel. It's disinformation.

What are you talking about? That's exactly what the laws to prevent women from getting abortions out of state are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pregnant women should now be allowed to use the carpool lane, and businesses should be able to charge pregnant women as two people.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/georgia-residents-can-now-claim-embryos-dependents-state-taxes-rcna41111

I know you think you're cute, but.... the carpool lane should be specifically for two adults. Your five-year-old shouldn't count either.

Wow. Typical GOP. Children don’t count after they are born according to you monsters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the direction these things are heading are (carpool lanes, treating a fetus like a person) bad for the non forced-birth efforts. Quit giving them what they want. A fetus is NOT a dependent. The more these crazy ideas are catered to, the more it is normalized.

But think of all the dependents at fertility clinics. That's a huge offset to the price of IVF

+1

Can you just keep claiming those embryos as dependents for the rest of your life if you never implant them? Imagine writing off five dependents as a 90 year old because you have frozen embryos from 60 years ago!

[Anonymous]

This could be a dilemma for Democrats. On the one hand they like giving away money and this is a perfect scenario to do so...but...how without acknowledging there is a life in the womb?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is the Twilight Zone. It's crazy, and since the Supreme Court opened the door to it, I think embryos from forced birth states should count on Federal taxes too.

No can do. That would make the embryos illegal immigrants. The Constitution is quite clear about no citizenship before birth.

Great, now we'll need to deport all the pregnant women.

This made me laugh. Thank you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can baby daddies be made to pay child support backdated to conception?

They should be made to pay for the medical care and partial upkeep of the mother. It takes a lot of work to carry a baby to full-term and healthy.

UPkeep? We are not talking about a mare here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can baby daddies be made to pay child support backdated to conception?

They should be made to pay for the medical care and partial upkeep of the mother. It takes a lot of work to carry a baby to full-term and healthy.

UPkeep? We are not talking about a mare here.

Have you shared your view about her being a mare with your mother?

[Anonymous]

LOL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If I get pregnant with quadruplets and then miscarry after filing taxes…can I keep the $15,000 deduction?

I would say yes because they were alive at tax filing time and then I, as a crazy GA judge, would throw you in jail for miscarrying. Cause that is how we roll in the south.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pregnant women should now be allowed to use the carpool lane, and businesses should be able to charge pregnant women as two people.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/georgia-residents-can-now-claim-embryos-dependents-state-taxes-rcna41111

I know you think you're cute, but.... the carpool lane should be specifically for two adults. Your five-year-old shouldn't count either.

A corporation is also a person so traveling with your work badge…

Of course, your “unborn child” would count if your born child would count.

Also adults should be allowed to drink at 21 years minus 9 months because life starts at conception.


This would go for voting too!

Ya can’t have it both ways.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If I get pregnant with quadruplets and then miscarry after filing taxes…can I keep the $15,000 deduction?

I would say yes because they were alive at tax filing time and then I, as a crazy GA judge, would throw you in jail for miscarrying. Cause that is how we roll in the south. [/quote

How about if I get pregnant in GA but abort in FL?

What if I have a false positive at Christmas?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pregnant women should now be allowed to use the carpool lane, and businesses should be able to charge pregnant women as two people.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/georgia-residents-can-now-claim-embryos-dependents-state-taxes-rcna41111

I know you think you're cute, but.... the carpool lane should be specifically for two adults. Your five-year-old shouldn't count either.

Shouldn't is not the law. HOV is based on number of occupants regardless of age. If a fetus = human, then head over to the HOV. But if you want to go lead that repeal fight, then let me get my popcorn while you split hairs on when the fetus is and is not human.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the direction these things are heading are (carpool lanes, treating a fetus like a person) bad for the non forced-birth efforts. Quit giving them what they want. A fetus is NOT a dependent. The more these crazy ideas are catered to, the more it is normalized.

As a person who doesnt support abortion in all scenarios, this is accurate. I think all of this is great. Yes, give them tax breaks! Let them use the HOV! Force dads to pay up!

And when women on here said they wouldnt have as much premarital sex, I thought, wow, thats an unintended benefit. It would be fantastic for people to have less casual sex. Esp with monkeypox going around. I didnt expect all these social benefits from the Roe decision.

Are you aware that the WV legislature is considering repealing child support so men will no longer feel the need to pressure women into having abortions? Who could have imagined that repeal of Roe would even more imperil the well-being of women and children? Right?