Khloe Kardashian new baby

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does she need to use a surrogate??

She had fertility struggles all along - with Lamar, then Tristan, then Tristan again. It was all on the show.

They've figured out coparenting and she wanted another kid; if this is true I'm not surprised.

Didn’t she say she didn’t really want to have children with Lamar Odom and the fertility issues were just for the plot line?

That's what I remytoo. She knew Lamar was using drugs and didn't want to have his kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Disgusting - the Kardashians are trash.

Hilarious that you all come on here trashing her but nothing about him. Misogynist trash.

Ok, they and their men are all trash. Better?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why would she reproduce with a man predisposed to cheating: TWICE? Oh, she’s a Kardashian

She anchored him (and his money) for the next 18 yrs

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does she need to use a surrogate??

She didn't want to ruin her figure, obviously.

Agree, and it’s so disgusting to me. A surrogate should only be used in extreme circumstances where a woman cannot get pregnant or it’s dangerous to carry a baby.

I am not particularly interested in the family -- other than to find the whole thing about them kind of fascinating -- but, who are you to decide this? I am SO TIRED of women's healthcare choices being policed by the morality police. Unless g-d whispers in your ear -- in which case you are not well -- you don't have special knowledge of what's right and wrong for someone else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would she reproduce with a man predisposed to cheating: TWICE? Oh, she’s a Kardashian

She anchored him (and his money) for the next 18 yrs

I think she’s actually worth more than him

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does she need to use a surrogate??

She didn't want to ruin her figure, obviously.

Agree, and it’s so disgusting to me. A surrogate should only be used in extreme circumstances where a woman cannot get pregnant or it’s dangerous to carry a baby.

I am not particularly interested in the family -- other than to find the whole thing about them kind of fascinating -- but, who are you to decide this? I am SO TIRED of women's healthcare choices being policed by the morality police. Unless g-d whispers in your ear -- in which case you are not well -- you don't have special knowledge of what's right and wrong for someone else.

outsourcing pregnancy is now a healthcare choice?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does she need to use a surrogate??

She didn't want to ruin her figure, obviously.

Agree, and it’s so disgusting to me. A surrogate should only be used in extreme circumstances where a woman cannot get pregnant or it’s dangerous to carry a baby.

Why? If it is mutually agreed upon - why does it matter?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does she need to use a surrogate??

She didn't want to ruin her figure, obviously.

Agree, and it’s so disgusting to me. A surrogate should only be used in extreme circumstances where a woman cannot get pregnant or it’s dangerous to carry a baby.

I am not particularly interested in the family -- other than to find the whole thing about them kind of fascinating -- but, who are you to decide this? I am SO TIRED of women's healthcare choices being policed by the morality police. Unless g-d whispers in your ear -- in which case you are not well -- you don't have special knowledge of what's right and wrong for someone else.

outsourcing pregnancy is now a healthcare choice?

Yes. My body, my choice. If I choose not to carry a baby for whatever reason, then yes. If I choose to use my eggs and someone else's sperm in another consenting adult's uterus, yes. I don't understand how this is a large leap from the abortion debate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why does she need to use a surrogate??

From what I can tell from the show she didn't want to do it the natural way with him. Even though she was with him last year it seemed very transactional.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does she need to use a surrogate??

She didn't want to ruin her figure, obviously.

Agree, and it’s so disgusting to me. A surrogate should only be used in extreme circumstances where a woman cannot get pregnant or it’s dangerous to carry a baby.

Why? If it is mutually agreed upon - why does it matter?

I agree. If the surrogate is being compensated and the agreement is consensual, I don't see a problem with it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guys, chill out. She wanted a sibling for her firstborn. Makes sense. I am a single mom who used sperm and egg donor and have a kid like that, since I was single and could not get pregnant with my own eggs anymore. So what? My kid will be probably brought up better than many other kids from two parent families.

I don’t care if she has another baby with the same guy’s sperm, I do think it’s awful that she is using a surrogate for no good reason other than she doesn’t want to ruin her body and deal with the the stress on her body from pregnancy. This use of surrogate trend from all these celebrities is messed up.

I kind of don’t care. She wants a baby but not be pregnant. That’s fine, why would that bother me? It honestly doesn’t seem that different to me than a couple that goes through IVF to have a baby because they can’t conceive naturally. In the past, neither khloe nor the IVF couple would have a baby - Khloe because she wouldn’t want to ruin her figure and the couple because it wouldn’t be possible. Either way, now both get what they desire. I have no problems with either but both are not natural occurrences.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guys, chill out. She wanted a sibling for her firstborn. Makes sense. I am a single mom who used sperm and egg donor and have a kid like that, since I was single and could not get pregnant with my own eggs anymore. So what? My kid will be probably brought up better than many other kids from two parent families.

I don’t care if she has another baby with the same guy’s sperm, I do think it’s awful that she is using a surrogate for no good reason other than she doesn’t want to ruin her body and deal with the the stress on her body from pregnancy. This use of surrogate trend from all these celebrities is messed up.

Why are those bad reasons to use a surrogate? The surrogate is compensated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does she need to use a surrogate??

She didn't want to ruin her figure, obviously.

Agree, and it’s so disgusting to me. A surrogate should only be used in extreme circumstances where a woman cannot get pregnant or it’s dangerous to carry a baby.

I am not particularly interested in the family -- other than to find the whole thing about them kind of fascinating -- but, who are you to decide this? I am SO TIRED of women's healthcare choices being policed by the morality police. Unless g-d whispers in your ear -- in which case you are not well -- you don't have special knowledge of what's right and wrong for someone else.

outsourcing pregnancy is now a healthcare choice?

What else would you call it? It wouldn't be my healthcare choice but the 3 times I've been pregnant all very much involved my health.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does she need to use a surrogate??

She didn't want to ruin her figure, obviously.

Agree, and it’s so disgusting to me. A surrogate should only be used in extreme circumstances where a woman cannot get pregnant or it’s dangerous to carry a baby.

I am not particularly interested in the family -- other than to find the whole thing about them kind of fascinating -- but, who are you to decide this? I am SO TIRED of women's healthcare choices being policed by the morality police. Unless g-d whispers in your ear -- in which case you are not well -- you don't have special knowledge of what's right and wrong for someone else.

outsourcing pregnancy is now a healthcare choice?

Yes. My body, my choice. If I choose not to carry a baby for whatever reason, then yes. If I choose to use my eggs and someone else's sperm in another consenting adult's uterus, yes. I don't understand how this is a large leap from the abortion debate.

+1. No one on this thread knows anything about Khloe's health and her reasoning behind making this decision, nor her surrogate's reasons for deciding to carry the baby. And it doesn't matter. I find it way more disturbing how many (usually white UMC) women are ready to jump in and patronize other women who choose to carry a pregnancy for another woman by assuming they're being exploited and are too stupid to make their own choices about what they do with their own bodies. The whole thing smacks of Anthony Kennedy's musings about how abortion should be made illegal because "the woman might regret it someday." Knock it off, lady.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does she need to use a surrogate??

She didn't want to ruin her figure, obviously.

Agree, and it’s so disgusting to me. A surrogate should only be used in extreme circumstances where a woman cannot get pregnant or it’s dangerous to carry a baby.

Why? If it is mutually agreed upon - why does it matter?

I agree. If the surrogate is being compensated and the agreement is consensual, I don't see a problem with it.

It makes me a little squeamish because it does feel like you are putting someone's body through a lot. They could have serious complications, even die. I know they get compensated but it's still kind of exploitative. That said, you can die doing lots of jobs so maybe it's not different from being a construction worker or a miner or any dangerous, physical job.