One of Miyares First Hires Resigned after being Exposed as Conspiracy Theorist

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's doxxing if her FB account is private - the WaPo "obtained" screenshots of it. Sounds like it's not a public account.

If the WaPo obtained a screenshot it was public. You may not like the WaPo but they have standard unlike your media.

Amen. People have forgotten how important the press is when it comes to our freedoom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's doxxing if her FB account is private - the WaPo "obtained" screenshots of it. Sounds like it's not a public account.

If the WaPo obtained a screenshot it was public. You may not like the WaPo but they have standard unlike your media.

Amen. People have forgotten how important the press is when it comes to our freedoom.

For some unknown reason, people keep telling me Facebook is a private company. Nothing on their servers is public.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's doxxing if her FB account is private - the WaPo "obtained" screenshots of it. Sounds like it's not a public account.

If the WaPo obtained a screenshot it was public. You may not like the WaPo but they have standard unlike your media.

Amen. People have forgotten how important the press is when it comes to our freedoom.

For some unknown reason, people keep telling me Facebook is a private company. Nothing on their servers is public.

What?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He resigned.

At this point, what difference does it make?

Why wasn’t she fired?

Why was she hired in the first place? How did the vetting process fail so spectacularly?

Perhaps Youngkin and team were ok with it?

+1. This is the Republican Party of today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He resigned.

At this point, what difference does it make?

Why wasn’t she fired?

Maybe she was “asked to resign?” Have any evidence that wasn’t the case?

Have you any knowledge that being asked to resign is a privilege compared to being fired?

It is a privilege but it can be less contentious and the results are the same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's doxxing if her FB account is private - the WaPo "obtained" screenshots of it. Sounds like it's not a public account.

This was DOXXING.

This is an opinion she shared with people. And then those people shared it. Would be better if we have all the insurrectionists out themselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He resigned.

At this point, what difference does it make?

Why wasn’t she fired?

Why was she hired in the first place? How did the vetting process fail so spectacularly?

Perhaps Youngkin and team were ok with it?

+1. This is the Republican Party of today.

Yup.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's doxxing if her FB account is private - the WaPo "obtained" screenshots of it. Sounds like it's not a public account.

This was DOXXING.

DP. This was not doxxing. Doxxing is digging up personal information about a private person that is not readily publicly and the posting it online to enable and encourage the faceless mob to stalk, harass and threaten them. That is not what happened here. The Washington Post obtained evidence that a public official previously expressed views that make them unfit to hold their position. Having obtained that evidence, it was very much in the public interest to have this information aired. They handled that information responsibly as journalists. That the public official lost their job over it does not make it inappropriate.

Thank you.

[Anonymous]

Don’t you live in D.C., OP?

Why do you care what happens in Richmond? It’s not your business.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Don’t you live in D.C., OP?

Why do you care what happens in Richmond? It’s not your business.

Insurrection and promotion of the big lie is most certainly the business of people who live in DC

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don’t you live in D.C., OP?

Why do you care what happens in Richmond? It’s not your business.

Insurrection and promotion of the big lie is most certainly the business of people who live in DC

You are not OP. No one asked you.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:Don’t you live in D.C., OP?

Why do you care what happens in Richmond? It’s not your business.

Well, Members of Congress from Virginia like to involve themselves in governing DC, so it's only fair that I involve myself in Virginia's politics.

Are you upset that I posted this thread?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don’t you live in D.C., OP?

Why do you care what happens in Richmond? It’s not your business.

Insurrection and promotion of the big lie is most certainly the business of people who live in DC

It’s the business of the whole country if someone who believes the election was stolen is in charge of all the elections in a swing state.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yay - let’s DOXX everyone and pretend it’s not a witch hunt.

I bet you were all torn up inside when governor youngkin in your view doxxed a minor child ….

I bet you really were so upset

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's doxxing if her FB account is private - the WaPo "obtained" screenshots of it. Sounds like it's not a public account.

If the WaPo obtained a screenshot it was public. You may not like the WaPo but they have standard unlike your media.

Amen. People have forgotten how important the press is when it comes to our freedoom.

For some unknown reason, people keep telling me Facebook is a private company. Nothing on their servers is public.

The profile page was public facing. Facebook account holders have the option to lock their accounts down or various levels of sharing. Content that's shared doesn't enjoy any privacy.