I'm assuming you are talking about need based aid. Run the numbers on their COA page.. They are all similar. Income of 200K+ and/or net worth of about $2M (outside of retirement and primary residence) will get you zero aid. |
+1. This was us. 100 percent EFC. Both kids went in-state |
In CA, state schools consider only FAFSA of the custodial parent. It's not unusual for kids to receive enough FA to cover full tuition and fees if the custodial parent's income is lower. Non-custodial parent's income/assets are not counted. For privates, you need custodial FAFSA and both parents' CSS. In the case of remarried parents, I believe most privates want income/assets of both biological parents as well as the step-parent(s). For Columbia, they want step-parent(s) in order to accurately segregate biological parent(s)' income/asset. They ask for, but do not count, step parent(s). If this is your scenario, always confirm with the school as this info may be dated. |
PP. not all privates require CSS of non-custodial parent, that was my point. UChicago did not ask us for bio father's, but I don't remember whether that was because I was married. Princeton did not ask for bio father's because I remarried, so they only counted one family's income - me + step-father. Ursinus did not ask for CSS at all. On the other hand, UMich asked us to fill out CSS, both parents, even though it's a public school. |
Are you insane? A million dollars is a lot of money. Full stop. |
How do you know this? The FAFSA doesn't even ask about home equity. The CSS asks for retirement accounts and home equity, savings, etc., but how do you know what factors are the most important? |
Not self employed, but can't pay $59K. In-state is about $19K with merit and scholarships. Yale gave us nothing three years ago, but we only had one kid in college. Now we'll have two. No mortgage, as we inherited our house, so maybe that's why we got no FA. But that's crazy too. We're supposed to mortgage our house to pay for our kid to go to college right before we retire? The whole system is broken for middle class people like us. |
This is not middle class. |
Why do you put such a large sum of money outside of retirement accounts? Why can't you put it into your retirement accounts if retirement is what you worried about? |
I was referring to schools that use CSS. If you run NPC’s for schools that consider home equity vs those that don’t you can see a difference of at least $5k/$100k equity in parental contribution depending on how much equity you have in your house. Also, check out this website that explains the issue: https://www.edmit.me/home-equity-financial-aid-calculator Of course if you have high non- retirement savings that will be an issue too. But for people with low to moderate savings and/or 529 accounts, home equity can be the difference of $20-30k in you have $400k+ equity in your home. For our family they eliminated many schools. |
Yes, it was the house— Yales counts equity in home and if you live in a high housing cost area they counted it as a high equity towards your total assets. |
I thought the $350K saving in non-retirement accounts is more significant than the house. If you have $350K sitting on your bank account, why would colleges give your child need-based aid? You should use at least part of the $350K towards tuition first, right? For a family with $145K HHI, emergency funds should be about $50K (6 months of after-tax HHI)? |
| Didn’t get any aid at 106k HHI, EFC 29k. |
5% of the $350k is expected to be used towards tuition in calculating EFC. My point was that the OP’s contribution may have been lower at schools that use CSS and don’t count home equity. OP’s income is way below Yale’s threshold for no aid. So yes, the $350k is considered but that is not the only reason they didn’t get aid. OP has to have other assets not accounted for in the post and my guess is home equity which many people on this board and people I know in NYC and CA never consider. That is why Stanford and USC dropped home equity in their financial aid formulas. People in high COL areas with expensive homes tend to have more equity because of the rapid increase in real estate value. |
But PP said they live in a small house. |