| NOVA |
People don't go to Sidwell because of any Quaker values/policies/vibe...when you hear about why people send their kids there, it's about the academics (and prestige, no doubt, has a lot to do with it). Haverford absolutely has first-rate academics but it is a Quaker institution at its core...and it IS what attracts many students... |
Okay then I’m sure your second-hand anecdotes must be more accurate then my first hand experience. Whatever. |
Agree although startups are ruining this. In general STEM elite schools will be more like this because the program is fairer and just really hard for all. Also agree about Midwestern SLACs. I know several Powell from Carleton, Grinnell, Oberlin that are the nicest people but so effective and brilliant. |
Purdue for STEM, eg, yes. UVA, no, as this board shows so much pomp and snootiness and weird obsession with reputation. |
I agree with this. My DC is at UCLA and I don't think any school except Cal can match the diversity at this top school. Every kind of diversity. And it's an academic powerhouse. |
|
|
| Grinnell |
DD applied to Haverford in part because its ethos and connection to Quakerism appealed to her even though we're not Quaker. Many schools no longer have the initial religious affiliations they once had, but I'm sure many of them still bear an imprint from their origins. |
| Smith & some of the all female schools. |
| Pomona and the other 5C schools. |
Haverford is not elite |
+100 Both of my kids were attracted to Haverford (but ultimately did not go there) because of the Quaker values and we're not Quaker...and the kids of friends that I know who have gone there were attracted for the same reason (also not Quaker)...and, to the OP's original question, very down-to-earth kids. |
OP asked about schools with average ACT of 31/32...Haverford's 25th-75th percentile range is 32-34...that may not be 'elite" to you but it is in the ballpark of what the OP was asking for (more selective if anything). |