What is the best age gap in a couple?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think same/similar age is ideal. Anything over 6 or 7 is problematic.

What's problematic about a six year age difference? DH is six years older. We haven't had a problem. We are in our 50s.

NP. It's just kind of weird and creepy tbh

Omg. Six or seven year difference is absolutely fine and not weird or creepy at all. Not even pushing it. Example - 56 husband and 50 wife? He may even look younger. Come on now. It’s not like at 27 year difference.

It's creepy to me and many others.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the guy being anywhere from 5-10 years younger is ideal. Most men act like children anyway, and benefit from being kind of bossed around by a woman. That ends up being the dynamic for most couples anyway, so when both parties go into it with that dynamic at play already (she's older and in authority), then there's no weird rebelliousness that happens, like the men you see here whining that their wife asked them to take out the trash. the rules get established from the jump

Plus less ED!!!

👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the guy being anywhere from 5-10 years younger is ideal. Most men act like children anyway, and benefit from being kind of bossed around by a woman. That ends up being the dynamic for most couples anyway, so when both parties go into it with that dynamic at play already (she's older and in authority), then there's no weird rebelliousness that happens, like the men you see here whining that their wife asked them to take out the trash. the rules get established from the jump

Plus less ED!!!

ED can be a blessing, who the heck wants to service a younger man daily several years into marriage. This set up is a disaster asking for him to cheat on you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think same/similar age is ideal. Anything over 6 or 7 is problematic.

What's problematic about a six year age difference? DH is six years older. We haven't had a problem. We are in our 50s.

NP. It's just kind of weird and creepy tbh

Omg. Six or seven year difference is absolutely fine and not weird or creepy at all. Not even pushing it. Example - 56 husband and 50 wife? He may even look younger. Come on now. It’s not like at 27 year difference.

Yea, the ^PP is weird to think a six year age difference in adults is creepy or weird.

But, I look younger than DH

The only complication could be about retirement, but we are on track to be able to retire together before the older spouse turns 60.

And actually the age difference works better for sexual compatibility in terms of a woman losing her drive earlier than men, in many cases.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think same/similar age is ideal. Anything over 6 or 7 is problematic.

What's problematic about a six year age difference? DH is six years older. We haven't had a problem. We are in our 50s.

NP. It's just kind of weird and creepy tbh

Omg. Six or seven year difference is absolutely fine and not weird or creepy at all. Not even pushing it. Example - 56 husband and 50 wife? He may even look younger. Come on now. It’s not like at 27 year difference.

It's creepy to me and many others.

why? six years is not old enough to be a father figure, at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the guy being anywhere from 5-10 years younger is ideal. Most men act like children anyway, and benefit from being kind of bossed around by a woman. That ends up being the dynamic for most couples anyway, so when both parties go into it with that dynamic at play already (she's older and in authority), then there's no weird rebelliousness that happens, like the men you see here whining that their wife asked them to take out the trash. the rules get established from the jump

Plus less ED!!!

ED can be a blessing, who the heck wants to service a younger man daily several years into marriage. This set up is a disaster asking for him to cheat on you.

It’s never a blessing. Especially when your partner loses his mojo early. A younger man will do quite nicely here. Daily service for each of us. Yes. Sign me up!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the guy being anywhere from 5-10 years younger is ideal. Most men act like children anyway, and benefit from being kind of bossed around by a woman. That ends up being the dynamic for most couples anyway, so when both parties go into it with that dynamic at play already (she's older and in authority), then there's no weird rebelliousness that happens, like the men you see here whining that their wife asked them to take out the trash. the rules get established from the jump

Plus less ED!!!

ED can be a blessing, who the heck wants to service a younger man daily several years into marriage. This set up is a disaster asking for him to cheat on you.

Me!! Sounds like fun, if hes young and hot. Better than "servicing" a wrinkled old man!

[Anonymous]

My husband is 5 years older than me. Met when I was 32 and worked out because he was at a point where he was ready for marriage and kids. We still have a lot in common and enjoy the same things. All of friend couples have an age gap of 3-8 years and it’s hasn’t seem to make a huge difference. All of my friends married a slightly older guy when they were late twenties or thirties.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think the guy being anywhere from 5-10 years younger is ideal. Most men act like children anyway, and benefit from being kind of bossed around by a woman. That ends up being the dynamic for most couples anyway, so when both parties go into it with that dynamic at play already (she's older and in authority), then there's no weird rebelliousness that happens, like the men you see here whining that their wife asked them to take out the trash. the rules get established from the jump

You have been dealing with some beta males. None of the men I know let their wives boss them around. How the hell is that even attractive? I would never be attracted to a man I had to boss around. I like real men, not immature men that I have to treat like a bad kid.

[Anonymous]

I recommend at least 3+. Men mature slower than women do. Even my DH thinks this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the guy being anywhere from 5-10 years younger is ideal. Most men act like children anyway, and benefit from being kind of bossed around by a woman. That ends up being the dynamic for most couples anyway, so when both parties go into it with that dynamic at play already (she's older and in authority), then there's no weird rebelliousness that happens, like the men you see here whining that their wife asked them to take out the trash. the rules get established from the jump

You have been dealing with some beta males. None of the men I know let their wives boss them around. How the hell is that even attractive? I would never be attracted to a man I had to boss around. I like real men, not immature men that I have to treat like a bad kid.

And relationships shouldn’t be someone controlling another person. Many women will claim abuse, so it’s not okay for the woman to have power over the men. Seems almost predatory. It’s creepy and weird.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the guy being anywhere from 5-10 years younger is ideal. Most men act like children anyway, and benefit from being kind of bossed around by a woman. That ends up being the dynamic for most couples anyway, so when both parties go into it with that dynamic at play already (she's older and in authority), then there's no weird rebelliousness that happens, like the men you see here whining that their wife asked them to take out the trash. the rules get established from the jump

You have been dealing with some beta males. None of the men I know let their wives boss them around. How the hell is that even attractive? I would never be attracted to a man I had to boss around. I like real men, not immature men that I have to treat like a bad kid.

Almost all the high value men I can think of get bossed around by their wives



All take him over your old wrinkled "alpha" anyday (this guy is way more alpha than your husband will ever be, alpha men defer to their wives)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the guy being anywhere from 5-10 years younger is ideal. Most men act like children anyway, and benefit from being kind of bossed around by a woman. That ends up being the dynamic for most couples anyway, so when both parties go into it with that dynamic at play already (she's older and in authority), then there's no weird rebelliousness that happens, like the men you see here whining that their wife asked them to take out the trash. the rules get established from the jump

Plus less ED!!!

ED can be a blessing, who the heck wants to service a younger man daily several years into marriage. This set up is a disaster asking for him to cheat on you.

Me!! Sounds like fun, if hes young and hot. Better than "servicing" a wrinkled old man!

The thing is you likely won’t be the only one servicing him. I would rather have an older guy than a younger guy that is getting serviced by others.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the guy being anywhere from 5-10 years younger is ideal. Most men act like children anyway, and benefit from being kind of bossed around by a woman. That ends up being the dynamic for most couples anyway, so when both parties go into it with that dynamic at play already (she's older and in authority), then there's no weird rebelliousness that happens, like the men you see here whining that their wife asked them to take out the trash. the rules get established from the jump

You have been dealing with some beta males. None of the men I know let their wives boss them around. How the hell is that even attractive? I would never be attracted to a man I had to boss around. I like real men, not immature men that I have to treat like a bad kid.

Almost all the high value men I can think of get bossed around by their wives



All take him over your old wrinkled "alpha" anyday (this guy is way more alpha than your husband will ever be, alpha men defer to their wives)

She seems like an old hag. She is quite ugly looking and looks like a b*tch. No way would I want someone bossing me around. It looks like a mom yelling at her son.

I will stick with my hot 40 year old husband who is my equal partner. We make decisions together and the daily sex is always hot and fun.

Enjoy your man who will eventually get tired of your old lady body and want someone his age. When you’re in menopause, he will be getting it somewhere else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the guy being anywhere from 5-10 years younger is ideal. Most men act like children anyway, and benefit from being kind of bossed around by a woman. That ends up being the dynamic for most couples anyway, so when both parties go into it with that dynamic at play already (she's older and in authority), then there's no weird rebelliousness that happens, like the men you see here whining that their wife asked them to take out the trash. the rules get established from the jump

Plus less ED!!!

ED can be a blessing, who the heck wants to service a younger man daily several years into marriage. This set up is a disaster asking for him to cheat on you.

Me!! Sounds like fun, if hes young and hot. Better than "servicing" a wrinkled old man!

The thing is you likely won’t be the only one servicing him. I would rather have an older guy than a younger guy that is getting serviced by others.

Sorry that you expect men to cheat on you. I've never been cheated on and dated some HOT younger guys! I guess you can only land the old, desperate ones with no other options?