Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:That seems kind of silly and regressive.
No. The times where he was out of town or a week where we were super busy and didn’t have the time was hot. It was like a raw sexual nature took over and we couldn’t wait to get our hands on each other. It was like having sex again for the first time. We abstained for two weeks before the wedding and it made it made the desire much stronger.
Have you continued to deliberately abstain for periods of time since getting married to boost your sexual desire?
No.
So sex had gotten boring before your wedding but didn’t get boring again afterward? I am trying to understand a reason for your decision that doesn’t ultimately feed into some outdated notions of pre-marital purity.
No. The sex is still amazing. It has nothing to do what purity. It was just the time of being away made our connection and desire much stronger and we wanted that again. We f*cked the entire honeymoon and it was bliss.
Stop with the purity nonsense. I never once mentioned that or said anything about it.
I also never said sex was boring. I said the desire was much stronger with time away or busy weeks. Stop trying to twist my words and make drama where there is none.
Hey, you do you. I still think it seems silly and regressive.
New poster, not the one to whom you're responding, PP in bold but....Do you see how telling someone "you do you" then following that by insulting their choice as "silly and regressive" (doubling down, since you said that once already) is contradictory?
Why the compulsion to be insulting? That poster and others have said what works for them. It doesn't work for you. You do you. See how that's supposed to go?