Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Brenda Diaz spoke Moms for Liberty event is endorsed by the Maryland GOP, and was specifically NOT endorsed by the Maryland State Educators Association, the organization representing Maryland public school teachers
We don't want union-endorsed candidates. We want people that will look out for what's best for kids.
Well we don’t want Nazi loving Christian nationalists on BOE for public school who Denys science and history.
We don’t want book banners who support Stephen Millers hate
We don’t want a person who could not be bothered to show up for her job!
Moderately MOCO put on two forums that Diaz was present for not only were her answers nonsense literally incoherent her treatment of others was unacceptable. We need people who work together not people who bring hate and aggression instead of trying to problem solve.
But Diaz's bad ideas have no chance of getting past the other BoE members, whereas Zimmerman's might. As a result, Zimmerman has more potential to do damage.
No Diaz not only supports RFk Jr and Stephen Miller her ideas about curriculum are horrifying.
Diaz is ultra right wing hate.
Have you heard her speak? It’s literally garbage hate and stupidity,
Not to mention her tenure at Gaithersburg HS was abysmal. Nothing from that job gives her any credibility to be on a BOE much less any employee anywhere . Who the hell dies not show up for their job for months? They way she talked about her students of color and minorities no.
The primary thing I consider when deciding who to vote for is the impact each candidate would have if elected.
Diaz is sufficiently fringe that she won't have much of an impact. No other board member or candidate will support the things on her agenda.
That obviously isn't good, but Zimmerman is far worse. Some of the things she wants may be able to get through the BoE, particularly if the other MCEA candidates win.
I'm not so much voting for Diaz as much as I am voting against Zimmerman and the MCEA.
I love how you are trying to sound so educated and thoughtful about your voting process but you just come off sounding like a total moron.
Which Board members or candidates would vote with Diaz on the issues you're worried about?
DP. Diaz would gum up the works. BOE members, with their paltry stipend requiring them to have alternate means of income/financial support, barely have the time to review what MCPS puts in front of them, much less extend the time of meetings to hold contentious but unproductive discussion.
Maybe if we paid them the equivalent of full time-plus professionals with the analytical capability, understanding of policy and experience we'd want representing us, there would be the time to cover such while getting the work done. Diaz's support comes from the opposite end of the political spectrum from that which would support that kind of pay for elected reps.
What are the specific issues that Zimmerman promotes about which there would be concern of their passage by the BOE?