Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 3

[Anonymous]

Other changes to her story:

First: short stairwell (to me that indicates split level or split foyer home)
Next: Small stairwell (no clue what that is)
Last: Narrow stairwell (to me this indicates townhouse)

Is she trying to change the location of the party and the description of the house? Sounds like it. Why?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can everyone supporting Kavanaugh tell us why you are overlooking his obvious lies under oath? Putting all the allegations aside and just looking at the yearbook definitions he gave and is clearly lying about - how do you rationalize that? I really want to hear from someone.

This has been done over and over again. Go back and look through the thread.

Where? Where has this been adequately explained? It's been glossed over. But no, haven't seen anyone rationalize it.

Short answer... because what YOU are calling lies, are not lies. At all. It’s wishful thinking on your part because we know that you see your efforts falling apart and so you are diverting your efforts to come up with something you think will derail this nominee.

He lied about even watching Ford's testimony. I mean, as plain on the nose on your face, he lied.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The FBI has not yet contacted Dr. Ford.

To date, there is absolutely no confirmation that ANY investigation is taking place at all.

Are they just running out the clock?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can everyone supporting Kavanaugh tell us why you are overlooking his obvious lies under oath? Putting all the allegations aside and just looking at the yearbook definitions he gave and is clearly lying about - how do you rationalize that? I really want to hear from someone.

This has been done over and over again. Go back and look through the thread.

Where? Where has this been adequately explained? It's been glossed over. But no, haven't seen anyone rationalize it.

Short answer... because what YOU are calling lies, are not lies. At all. It’s wishful thinking on your part because we know that you see your efforts falling apart and so you are diverting your efforts to come up with something you think will derail this nominee.

He lied about even watching Ford's testimony. I mean, as plain on the nose on your face, he lied.

Prove he did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The FBI has not yet contacted Dr. Ford.

To date, there is absolutely no confirmation that ANY investigation is taking place at all.

Are they just running out the clock?

Once again, nobody knows what they have or haven’t done. It is an FBI investigation. Done in confidence. It is not for public consumption at this point.... as this SHOULD have been the way it was done all along. Thanks, Feinstein.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can everyone supporting Kavanaugh tell us why you are overlooking his obvious lies under oath? Putting all the allegations aside and just looking at the yearbook definitions he gave and is clearly lying about - how do you rationalize that? I really want to hear from someone.

This has been done over and over again. Go back and look through the thread.

Where? Where has this been adequately explained? It's been glossed over. But no, haven't seen anyone rationalize it.

Short answer... because what YOU are calling lies, are not lies. At all. It’s wishful thinking on your part because we know that you see your efforts falling apart and so you are diverting your efforts to come up with something you think will derail this nominee.

He lied about even watching Ford's testimony. I mean, as plain on the nose on your face, he lied.

Prove he did.

His aid tweeted it, it was screen captured and shared widely including here. And then she deleted it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can everyone supporting Kavanaugh tell us why you are overlooking his obvious lies under oath? Putting all the allegations aside and just looking at the yearbook definitions he gave and is clearly lying about - how do you rationalize that? I really want to hear from someone.

This has been done over and over again. Go back and look through the thread.

Where? Where has this been adequately explained? It's been glossed over. But no, haven't seen anyone rationalize it.

Short answer... because what YOU are calling lies, are not lies. At all. It’s wishful thinking on your part because we know that you see your efforts falling apart and so you are diverting your efforts to come up with something you think will derail this nominee.

So Devil’s Triangle is a drinking game and RenateAlumnius is a term of affection? Based on your comment above, you are stating that those two definitions are factually accurate? Please confirm yes or no.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The FBI has not yet contacted Dr. Ford.

To date, there is absolutely no confirmation that ANY investigation is taking place at all.

Are they just running out the clock?

Once again, nobody knows what they have or haven’t done. It is an FBI investigation. Done in confidence. It is not for public consumption at this point.... as this SHOULD have been the way it was done all along. Thanks, Feinstein.

Two of the women confirm that they have not yet been contacted as of 10 minutes ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can everyone supporting Kavanaugh tell us why you are overlooking his obvious lies under oath? Putting all the allegations aside and just looking at the yearbook definitions he gave and is clearly lying about - how do you rationalize that? I really want to hear from someone.

This has been done over and over again. Go back and look through the thread.

Where? Where has this been adequately explained? It's been glossed over. But no, haven't seen anyone rationalize it.

Short answer... because what YOU are calling lies, are not lies. At all. It’s wishful thinking on your part because we know that you see your efforts falling apart and so you are diverting your efforts to come up with something you think will derail this nominee.

He lied about even watching Ford's testimony. I mean, as plain on the nose on your face, he lied.

Prove he did.

His aid tweeted it, it was screen captured and shared widely including here. And then she deleted it.

Show it. If it was screen captured, it is there somewhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can everyone supporting Kavanaugh tell us why you are overlooking his obvious lies under oath? Putting all the allegations aside and just looking at the yearbook definitions he gave and is clearly lying about - how do you rationalize that? I really want to hear from someone.

This has been done over and over again. Go back and look through the thread.

Where? Where has this been adequately explained? It's been glossed over. But no, haven't seen anyone rationalize it.

Short answer... because what YOU are calling lies, are not lies. At all. It’s wishful thinking on your part because we know that you see your efforts falling apart and so you are diverting your efforts to come up with something you think will derail this nominee.

So Devil’s Triangle is a drinking game and RenateAlumnius is a term of affection? Based on your comment above, you are stating that those two definitions are factually accurate? Please confirm yes or no.

Yep. Factually accurate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can everyone supporting Kavanaugh tell us why you are overlooking his obvious lies under oath? Putting all the allegations aside and just looking at the yearbook definitions he gave and is clearly lying about - how do you rationalize that? I really want to hear from someone.

This has been done over and over again. Go back and look through the thread.

Where? Where has this been adequately explained? It's been glossed over. But no, haven't seen anyone rationalize it.

Short answer... because what YOU are calling lies, are not lies. At all. It’s wishful thinking on your part because we know that you see your efforts falling apart and so you are diverting your efforts to come up with something you think will derail this nominee.

So Devil’s Triangle is a drinking game and RenateAlumnius is a term of affection? Based on your comment above, you are stating that those two definitions are factually accurate? Please confirm yes or no.

There is no basis for saying they are not factually accurate. We are talking about teenage boys here with lots of inside slang. The whole Devil's Triangle is based on an 2018 Urban Dictionary entry. This was all almost 40 years ago--slang evolves very quickly.

[Anonymous]

This is just more evidence that the Democrats were eager to have this whole case tried in the media, facts be damned. Nothing like a good, thorough character assassination to derail this nominee.
Sheldon Whitehouse is a partisan jerk.

Committee investigators have actively pursued a number of tips the committee has received regarding the nomination of Judge Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, though the committee has not been able to substantiate any allegations of wrongdoing by Judge Kavanaugh. One tip was referred to the committee by staff for Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I). While Whitehouse referred the accuser to a reporter, the committee took the claim seriously and questioned Judge Kavanaugh about the allegations under penalty of felony. Judge Kavanaugh denied any misconduct. After the transcripts of that interview became public, the individual recanted the claims on a social media post.

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/press/rep/releases/judiciary-committee-refers-potential-false-statements-for-criminal-investigation

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can everyone supporting Kavanaugh tell us why you are overlooking his obvious lies under oath? Putting all the allegations aside and just looking at the yearbook definitions he gave and is clearly lying about - how do you rationalize that? I really want to hear from someone.

This has been done over and over again. Go back and look through the thread.

Where? Where has this been adequately explained? It's been glossed over. But no, haven't seen anyone rationalize it.

Short answer... because what YOU are calling lies, are not lies. At all. It’s wishful thinking on your part because we know that you see your efforts falling apart and so you are diverting your efforts to come up with something you think will derail this nominee.

So Devil’s Triangle is a drinking game and RenateAlumnius is a term of affection? Based on your comment above, you are stating that those two definitions are factually accurate? Please confirm yes or no.

There is no basis for saying they are not factually accurate. We are talking about teenage boys here with lots of inside slang. The whole Devil's Triangle is based on an 2018 Urban Dictionary entry. This was all almost 40 years ago--slang evolves very quickly.

Renate seemed to have a thought or two.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can everyone supporting Kavanaugh tell us why you are overlooking his obvious lies under oath? Putting all the allegations aside and just looking at the yearbook definitions he gave and is clearly lying about - how do you rationalize that? I really want to hear from someone.

This has been done over and over again. Go back and look through the thread.

Where? Where has this been adequately explained? It's been glossed over. But no, haven't seen anyone rationalize it.

Short answer... because what YOU are calling lies, are not lies. At all. It’s wishful thinking on your part because we know that you see your efforts falling apart and so you are diverting your efforts to come up with something you think will derail this nominee.

So Devil’s Triangle is a drinking game and RenateAlumnius is a term of affection? Based on your comment above, you are stating that those two definitions are factually accurate? Please confirm yes or no.

There is no basis for saying they are not factually accurate. We are talking about teenage boys here with lots of inside slang. The whole Devil's Triangle is based on an 2018 Urban Dictionary entry. This was all almost 40 years ago--slang evolves very quickly.

Renate seemed to have a thought or two.

Of course. Because the media went with false information and spread it until it appeared to be “truth.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can everyone supporting Kavanaugh tell us why you are overlooking his obvious lies under oath? Putting all the allegations aside and just looking at the yearbook definitions he gave and is clearly lying about - how do you rationalize that? I really want to hear from someone.

This has been done over and over again. Go back and look through the thread.

Where? Where has this been adequately explained? It's been glossed over. But no, haven't seen anyone rationalize it.

Short answer... because what YOU are calling lies, are not lies. At all. It’s wishful thinking on your part because we know that you see your efforts falling apart and so you are diverting your efforts to come up with something you think will derail this nominee.

So Devil’s Triangle is a drinking game and RenateAlumnius is a term of affection? Based on your comment above, you are stating that those two definitions are factually accurate? Please confirm yes or no.

There is no basis for saying they are not factually accurate. We are talking about teenage boys here with lots of inside slang. The whole Devil's Triangle is based on an 2018 Urban Dictionary entry. This was all almost 40 years ago--slang evolves very quickly.

Oh, the gaslighting. Or, more plainly, the lying and obfuscation.