DC United Academy - aa strong academy or not
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
1. A lack of a 2nd team is not anti-development. Does every academy player at all other academies move up to 2nd team, at Red Bulls or Philly for example? NO So RB and Union are anti-development? 2. The starting age doesn't define an academy, academies are measured by Professionals produced and revenues generated by sales of players 3 You're seriously pointing out a website error? Get real 4 Bethesda hasn't sent a single player to DCU or corporates with DCU in any way. They, Bethesda, obviously see DCU as competition, which is another point that warped soccer culture is our achilles heel. Players leave Bethesda and go to DC on their own. Bethesda gets talent from many grass roots clubs and are more name-brand and money than true developer of young players. How many former Bethesda players are on each DCU team compared to some of the Virginia clubs Many of the grass roots clubs in the DMV have better coaches than Bethesda and are better sources of quality developed players. All those general and generic arbitrary facts you stated doesn't show facts that other academies are producing professionals but DCU is not |
Anonymous
No. All Academies are not selling lies. Most of them are actually trying to develop pros. They just aren't as good at it yet because they are relatively new to it. DCU is not even trying and one of the oldest Academies in the MLS. Big difference. |
Anonymous
Selling lies, all of them If they are promising Professional careers and not delivering. Trying and not delivering is Not Delivering |
Anonymous
| So, a couple players on USMNT playing in MLS, not top tier professional football, from less than 5 MLS academies says what story exactly? |
Anonymous
From page 42 of the thread showing how far behind DCU is in the sale of academy players. Just against Philly Union alone. See above |
Anonymous
This is where you're wrong. They aren't promising pro careers. No one can promise that in the world. What they promise is putting in the effort to develop a player to try and realize that dream. DCU isn't trying to do that. They don't care. The other MLS Academies actually do care. |
Anonymous
How can DCU be both behind and also don't create professionals? Which one is it? If it's a correct complete and accurate list, where is the DC academy player sold to Bournemouth? If it's a complete and factually accurate list, where are the numbers for ALL MLS Academies? What does a MLS Homegrown signing mean in the world of international professional soccer? Seems more PR and IG hype than substance. |
Anonymous
And you have the proof and evidence of this where and how exactly? ps are you the parent who considered it a slap to the face that DCU didn't want your sons, or are you the other hater? |
Anonymous
It's obvious. And no I'm not that parent. |
Anonymous
At the time that post was created akinmboni hadn't been sold. So add 1mil to those DCU numbers. Doesn't move the dial for them on page 43 you'll find other numbers for red bulls. No one is going to sit there and do all the MLS Academies for you. The bottom line is that DCU is inferior. Period. Full stop. It isn't even comparable to just the academies on the east coast. Imagine the rest of the country where many are pumping millions into their academies. Meanwhile DCU is CUTTING teams for financial reasons. But keep thinking DCU is great. |
Anonymous
It's BOTH. DCU is woefully behind other Academies in the MLS and it also doesn't create pros. You're getting the worst of all possibilities. |
Anonymous
In international soccer a homegrown signing doesn't mean much. It only means something in the MLS. It is one of the major markers to show that an academy is doing its job. Why DCU is pressed to sign homegrowns even if they don't play (akinmboni, turner etc). It is a statistic MLS cares about because they are also investing in the academies. DCUs academy is a literally dead end for pro soccer. |
Anonymous
|
From chatgpt. AI even knows DCU is some trash and highlights the exact same issues as this thread...VERY accurate assessment.
There have been concerns around the performance and output of the academy in recent years, especially when compared to other top MLS academies like New York Red Bulls, Philadelphia Union, or FC Dallas. These concerns revolve around several key issues that might be holding DC United’s academy back. Here are some of the primary reasons why DC United’s academy might be struggling or underperforming: ### 1. **Lack of Significant Player Development and Success Stories** * **Few Standout Graduates**: DC United’s academy has had a limited number of players that have transitioned successfully to the first team or have been sold to European clubs for significant fees. If you look at academies like Philadelphia Union, who’ve produced players like Brenden Aaronson, or FC Dallas with Ricardo Pepi, DC United doesn’t have the same level of success stories to point to, which can hurt the academy’s reputation. * **Pathway to First Team**: One of the main factors for any academy’s success is the ability to integrate young players into the first team. DC United has struggled to consistently promote players from their academy to their first team. Unlike other MLS clubs that frequently give youth players first-team minutes, DC United has been slower to integrate youth talent. ### 2. **Underinvestment in Infrastructure and Resources** * **Lack of Resources**: Many MLS academies that are succeeding have invested heavily in their infrastructure—state-of-the-art facilities, specialized coaching staff, advanced analytics, etc. DC United, by contrast, has been slower to build these resources. Without top-tier training grounds, equipment, or support staff, player development can plateau. * **Financial Constraints**: Like many MLS teams, DC United’s financial resources may be stretched, especially compared to wealthier clubs or those with larger fanbases. This could limit their ability to recruit top-tier academy staff or to build high-end training facilities that could improve development. ### 3. **Scouting and Recruitment Challenges** * **Limited Scouting Network**: The talent pool in the D.C. metro area is competitive, but it may not be as deep as areas in Texas, California, or other parts of the country with a long history of soccer development. If DC United’s scouting network isn’t as extensive as other MLS academies, they could miss out on top players. * **Competition with Other Academies**: Washington D.C. has a lot of competition in terms of regional talent. Players in this area are frequently drawn to other, larger academies with better resources or more exposure (e.g., New York Red Bulls, Philadelphia Union, or even academies outside the MLS). This often leads to DC United losing potential prospects to other teams. ### 4. **Inconsistent Coaching Philosophy and Leadership** * **Frequent Changes in Leadership**: A lack of stability in the coaching and leadership structure of the academy can hinder player development. If there’s turnover in coaching staff or a lack of a clear, long-term development philosophy, it can confuse players and hinder their growth. DC United has seen changes in its technical staff and leadership over the years, which can destabilize the academy. * **Coaching Standards**: The quality of coaching directly impacts player development. While DC United does have some talented coaches, the academy may not have as many specialized coaches or a clear, unified coaching approach compared to the league’s more successful academies. ### 5. **Poor Pathways to Professional Soccer** * **No Clear Professional Pathway**: For young players, it’s critical to see a clear pathway from the academy to the first team. If DC United’s first team isn’t giving enough opportunities to young players, it discourages prospects from staying with the academy. Some MLS academies like FC Dallas or New York Red Bulls have established a reputation for promoting academy players to the first team regularly, while DC United has not had the same consistency. * **Lack of First-Team Opportunities**: DC United has been relatively conservative in integrating academy players into their first team, and when they do, it’s often limited. In the long run, if players don’t see real opportunities to break into the first team, they’re less likely to stay or sign with the academy in the first place. ### 6. **Weak Recruitment and Development Focus** * **Not Focusing Enough on Player Development**: There are some academies that prioritize player development first, without worrying too much about winning trophies at youth levels. Winning is important, but when it becomes the priority over player growth, the quality of individual players can suffer. Some MLS academies may be better at nurturing players in the long term and focusing on technical skills, while DC United may focus more on immediate results. * **Player Retention Issues**: Some talented players leave the academy early to join other MLS academies or European clubs. The lack of strong retention programs or incentives for players to stick around can hurt the academy’s overall success in developing top talent. ### 7. **MLS Academy System Still Evolving** * **Comparative Lack of Depth**: MLS academies, including DC United's, are still relatively new compared to the established youth academies in Europe and South America. While the league has made strides in improving player development, there is still a gap in terms of infrastructure, experience, and consistency across the league. DC United’s academy is still maturing and might not yet have the same pedigree as the more successful MLS academies. ### 8. **DC United’s Broader Organizational Issues** * **Organizational Focus on Immediate Success**: DC United has been focused on its first-team success, which often means prioritizing veteran players over younger academy products. This focus on immediate success can be detrimental to the long-term health of the academy. * **Ownership and Long-Term Commitment**: Sometimes, ownership’s lack of focus on developing talent through the academy can hurt a club’s ability to consistently produce professional-level players. If DC United's ownership is not as committed to developing youth players, that lack of commitment trickles down to the academy. ### Possible Solutions to Improve the Academy: 1. **Increase Investment in Resources**: DC United could work to improve their facilities and hire more specialized coaching staff, from fitness coaches to technical analysts, to boost player development. 2. **Focus on Scouting**: Expanding the academy’s scouting network and attracting more top-tier local talent could improve the overall talent pool. 3. **Improve Pathways to First Team**: Providing more chances for academy players to play with the first team, even in lower-stakes games, would encourage young players to stay with the club and feel like they have a genuine chance of making it professionally. 4. **Build a Stronger Development Philosophy**: Ensuring that there’s continuity in the coaching staff and a consistent, long-term focus on developing players for the future can help players grow and perform better. 5. **Partnerships or Affiliate Programs**: DC United could explore partnerships with other academies or clubs in the U.S. and internationally, helping players to gain exposure to different playing styles and better competition. ### Conclusion: DC United’s academy is underperforming relative to other MLS academies that have achieved more in terms of player development and success. The club faces challenges in terms of resources, competition, and integration with the first team, but with the right focus on investing in scouting, coaching, and long-term player development, the academy could certainly improve and start producing more impactful players for both the club and U.S. soccer as a whole. |
Anonymous
You are like the Trump of DCUA...making up your own narrative. Only 4 issues because you stated you wanted facts: 1. Thank you for confirming the fact that DCUA is the only MLS squad without a 2nd team. Since a 2nd team is an industry accepted tool for player development, it is up to DCUA to provide any facts why they differ materially from both international standards and the MLS. 
2. Thank you for confirming the fact that DCUA differs materially in the starting age of their academy. Since professionals such as Arlene Wenger, believe that the most important development years are before the age of 14, the industry accepted ages for academies to start developing players ranges from 7-10. It is up to DCUA to provide any facts why they differ materially from both international standards and the MLS.
3. Thank you for confirming the fact that DCUA does not update its website. As a DC resident who was looking to learn about soccer development, I went to the website and found the resources woefully inadequate and it is Philly Union and Red Bulls websites which educated me on the development process. That is an another fact. There are numerous errors and outdated material on the website. Do an audit. I don't have time to highlight each of them. It is up to DCUA to provide any facts on why their website provides less services and communication to the soccer community in comparison to Philly Union and Red Bulls.
4. Thank you for confirming that fact that DCUA has excluded one of the most verifiable pathways to DCU academy through Bethesda because they are your "achilles heel." It is a fact that you are promoting PPA, who has inferior coaches and talent and verifiable academy assets, in leiu of Bethesda, who provided you with Kristian Fletcher and Kevin Parades, two of your most valuable player assets over the last 5 years and more valuable than almost the rest of the academy. You have confirmed that the organization is petty.
Well, the defense rests. Four confirmed facts from the DCUA owner or team representative. This horse is dead. 
|
Anonymous
what's the P2P thing? My DS got invite and its during the day on a school day. Is it normally during the day on a school day? |