GA Case

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Decision is out. No conflict of interest but some appearance of impropriety - Willis does not need to recuse but should get rid of Wade if she doesn’t.

This wins the internet today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Decision is out. No conflict of interest but some appearance of impropriety - Willis does not need to recuse but should get rid of Wade if she doesn’t.

This is the right result. There was no proof of financial gain or impropriety. There was clearly a personal relationship that should not have happened or should have been disclosed, but that isn't enough to derail the entire case.

Not a lawyer over here but this seems about right to me too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Decision is out. No conflict of interest but some appearance of impropriety - Willis does not need to recuse but should get rid of Wade if she doesn’t.

This wins the internet today.

Very support of Fani, but this really does.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Decision is out. No conflict of interest but some appearance of impropriety - Willis does not need to recuse but should get rid of Wade if she doesn’t.

This is the right result. There was no proof of financial gain or impropriety. There was clearly a personal relationship that should not have happened or should have been disclosed, but that isn't enough to derail the entire case.

+1 This sums it up nicely.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm curious whether there is still a question of perjury....

No.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm curious whether there is still a question of perjury....

No.

+1

Perjury would be for Ivanka in DC and NY.
Perjury would be for Allen Wesselberg in NY

[Anonymous]

No, MAGA shitheels, Fani Willis did not commit perjury. If she had, Judge McAfee would've cited it in his decision. But the whole thing is a red herring to this simple fact:
Your boy tried to change vote totals in an attempt to steal an election. And it's on tape,

[Anonymous]

Trump gets convicted in 2025 instead of 2024.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm curious whether there is still a question of perjury....

Of course there is.
I don't think this is the last we will hear about this judge's decision.

Add to that.... Fani is being investigated by other groups. Georgia Senate, for one.

That one's purely politically motivated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm curious whether there is still a question of perjury....

Of course there is.
I don't think this is the last we will hear about this judge's decision.

Add to that.... Fani is being investigated by other groups. Georgia Senate, for one.

That one's purely politically motivated.

As is this entire case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm curious whether there is still a question of perjury....

Of course there is.
I don't think this is the last we will hear about this judge's decision.

Add to that.... Fani is being investigated by other groups. Georgia Senate, for one.

That one's purely politically motivated.

As is this entire case.

No.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Talk about threading the needle! Everybody is angry which means it's a fair call.

[Anonymous]

McAfee also seems to be saying "There is a chance this case will be kneecapped by somebody - but that somebody won't be me."

[Anonymous]

You partisan hacks are a strange bunch.

The order literally said there was an appearance of impropriety and that they lied about their relationship. She now needs to cut her bedfellow loose.

Everyone involved in this, on all sides, is a disgrace. This country is a joke.