Amy Coney Barrett- what in the actual F?

[Anonymous]

^^Democrats once again changing the meaning of words. You folks are good at that.

[Anonymous]

I like this cartoon a lot -- but what is the choice of having so many justices in the court building? I think I count 24? Is that supposed to represent something?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I like this cartoon a lot -- but what is the choice of having so many justices in the court building? I think I count 24? Is that supposed to represent something?

Oh -- I think it is all the judges appointed. Not just just supreme court so nevermind!

I love how Biden and Mitch are drawn! Barrett looks kinda zombie like the Stepford judge that she is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So ironic that liberals pay all this lip service to feminism and working mothers, yet Republicans are the first to nominate a working mother with seven kids of school age. And Republicans will be the first to elect a female president.

And all the while, liberals will year these women down for their sheer audacity of NOT being liberals. What hypocrisy.

The irony is that Republicans (can't call you all conservatives, since you all seem to have no political philosophy beyond "What Trump said" anymore) can't tell the difference between tokenism and meaningful policy change that helps working families.

Also, the first woman Speaker of the House (and still the woman to have held the most senior political position in the US ever) was a Democrat. There's a very high chance that the first woman to be VP in the US will be a Democrat come January.

Not to mention Democrats (and a majority of Americans) did vote for a woman for president in 2016 PPP is a complete idiot!! We love women who stand up for women.

Hillary Clinton and Merrick Garland can have a pity party together.

[jsteele]

This thread has drifted pretty far off topic.