Call to Action: Stop Bannon Appointment

[Anonymous]

So what's happening with this now? Apparently inside DC he's having a lot of trouble getting people to meet with him and work with him...

[Anonymous]

He is going to have a very hard time finding 3000 competent and knowledgable appointees.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was Sharpton appointed to be the senior advisor to the president of the united states?

When he went to the WH like 100 times under Obama.

When Sanders and HRC had to s*ck up to him in his apparent capacity ad czar of AA affairs.

So you are ok with the idea that the person closest to the president's ear believes one should be a property owner to vote.

Simple yes or no question.

What exactly is the simple yes or no question, when you embedd 4-5 clauses in a sentence, two of which reflect faulty assumptions?

Do I believe you are very smart?

NO.

Do I believe you deserve to vote?

YES (assuming you are a citizen and not in jail for a crime you committed)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So what's happening with this now? Apparently inside DC he's having a lot of trouble getting people to meet with him and work with him...

Yes. What's happening wth the phone calls?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Climate Change nonsense is going away and Senator Inhofe's great speech concerning that issue will be trumpeted throughout the nation.

Regrettably, climate change is not going away.
Regrettably, the US will become irrelevant as research will be done elsewhere.

Sad but true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So what's happening with this now? Apparently inside DC he's having a lot of trouble getting people to meet with him and work with him...

I think a lot of the smarter, seasoned Republicans see how toxic this all is and know that it would damage their political career.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was Sharpton appointed to be the senior advisor to the president of the united states?

When he went to the WH like 100 times under Obama.

When Sanders and HRC had to s*ck up to him in his apparent capacity ad czar of AA affairs.

So you are ok with the idea that the person closest to the president's ear believes one should be a property owner to vote.

Simple yes or no question.

What exactly is the simple yes or no question, when you embedd 4-5 clauses in a sentence, two of which reflect faulty assumptions?

Do I believe you are very smart?

NO.

Do I believe you deserve to vote?

YES (assuming you are a citizen and not in jail for a crime you committed)

Not PP, but I'll rephrase the question.
Are you ok with the fact that the president elect will have a chief WH strategist who believes one should be a property owner to vote?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what's happening with this now? Apparently inside DC he's having a lot of trouble getting people to meet with him and work with him...

I think a lot of the smarter, seasoned Republicans see how toxic this all is and know that it would damage their political career.

Really get over yourself. People are lining up to fill the Trump administration. I know three or four parents from my child's class who are very excited about opportunities in the Trump administration and it's a liberal school . This happens every time there is a changing of administration. The losing party is all sour grapes, many old hands from the winning party find they have no seat at the table and it's all gloom and doom. Yet all the position get filled. The work on washington gets done. It's what is great about this country, we can turn on a dime.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what's happening with this now? Apparently inside DC he's having a lot of trouble getting people to meet with him and work with him...

I think a lot of the smarter, seasoned Republicans see how toxic this all is and know that it would damage their political career.

Really get over yourself. People are lining up to fill the Trump administration. I know three or four parents from my child's class who are very excited about opportunities in the Trump administration and it's a liberal school . This happens every time there is a changing of administration. The losing party is all sour grapes, many old hands from the winning party find they have no seat at the table and it's all gloom and doom. Yet all the position get filled. The work on washington gets done. It's what is great about this country, we can turn on a dime.

Working in Trump administration is one thing. Working with Bannon is another.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what's happening with this now? Apparently inside DC he's having a lot of trouble getting people to meet with him and work with him...

I think a lot of the smarter, seasoned Republicans see how toxic this all is and know that it would damage their political career.

Really get over yourself. People are lining up to fill the Trump administration. I know three or four parents from my child's class who are very excited about opportunities in the Trump administration and it's a liberal school . This happens every time there is a changing of administration. The losing party is all sour grapes, many old hands from the winning party find they have no seat at the table and it's all gloom and doom. Yet all the position get filled. The work on washington gets done. It's what is great about this country, we can turn on a dime.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was Sharpton appointed to be the senior advisor to the president of the united states?

When he went to the WH like 100 times under Obama.

When Sanders and HRC had to s*ck up to him in his apparent capacity ad czar of AA affairs.

So you are ok with the idea that the person closest to the president's ear believes one should be a property owner to vote.

Simple yes or no question.

What exactly is the simple yes or no question, when you embedd 4-5 clauses in a sentence, two of which reflect faulty assumptions?

Do I believe you are very smart?

NO.

Do I believe you deserve to vote?

YES (assuming you are a citizen and not in jail for a crime you committed)

So the answer is yes, you are ok with an overt racist working at the highest levels of our government.

Thanks for playing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was Sharpton appointed to be the senior advisor to the president of the united states?

When he went to the WH like 100 times under Obama.

When Sanders and HRC had to s*ck up to him in his apparent capacity ad czar of AA affairs.

So you are ok with the idea that the person closest to the president's ear believes one should be a property owner to vote.

Simple yes or no question.

What exactly is the simple yes or no question, when you embedd 4-5 clauses in a sentence, two of which reflect faulty assumptions?

Do I believe you are very smart?

NO.

Do I believe you deserve to vote?

YES (assuming you are a citizen and not in jail for a crime you committed)

So the answer is yes, you are ok with an overt racist working at the highest levels of our government.

Thanks for playing.

Well Clinton is racist and sexist. She got her "highest level" job through husband. So you are okay with it to...just as long as you are on the side doing it.

[Anonymous]

I didn't vote for Hillary and she is not in politics anymore. This is about Trump and Bannon.

You are accepting and facilitating racism.

Own it.

[Anonymous]

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/27/us/politics/steve-bannon-white-house.html?_r=1

I guess the Steve Bannon smear campaign was a smear campaign after all.

Bannon's closest friend of 30 years is an African-American. They met on Wall Street. This friend considers Bannon "family" and often spends holidays with him (sometimes Bannon is the only white person at the gathering) and this friend says "Hell No He is not a White Supremacist."

Bannon's longtime assistant is an African-American woman.

http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2016/11/26/look-steven-bannon-and-his-years-harvard-business-school/B2m0j85jh5jRKzKbMastzK/story.html

And the Boston Globe interviewed his HBS classmates who all said great things about him. Great guy; smartest one in the class; a leader; well prepared; thoughtful, kind, not a racist or bigot, etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was Sharpton appointed to be the senior advisor to the president of the united states?

When he went to the WH like 100 times under Obama.

When Sanders and HRC had to s*ck up to him in his apparent capacity ad czar of AA affairs.

So you are ok with the idea that the person closest to the president's ear believes one should be a property owner to vote.

Simple yes or no question.

What exactly is the simple yes or no question, when you embedd 4-5 clauses in a sentence, two of which reflect faulty assumptions?

Do I believe you are very smart?

NO.

Do I believe you deserve to vote?

YES (assuming you are a citizen and not in jail for a crime you committed)

So the answer is yes, you are ok with an overt racist working at the highest levels of our government.

Thanks for playing.

Well Clinton is racist and sexist. She got her "highest level" job through husband. So you are okay with it to...just as long as you are on the side doing it.

True, but it has been Obama who showed her the way of racism and double standards.

Did HE, our God, say any thing powerful and personal when the victim was Latino or Asian or white?

Nope. He is only touched when a black kid dies at the hands of a white person.

Not when anyone else gets killed by a black person -- which, like it or not, is by far the most likely scenario.