Kim Kardashian held at gunpoint

[Anonymous]

Why are you people discussing her 10+ year old sex tape instead of the fact this whole robbery was likely faked?

[Anonymous]

Why wouldn't Kim K have won a lawsuit?

I would think that if someone made a sex tape, they would have an expectation of privacy and would easily win a lawsuit to prevent the release of the tape.

This is why I think maybe Kim is lying and did want the tape released. She is an exhibitionist clearly. She loves her body and loves to show it off.

I finally watched the darn video yesterday. I was wondering if it was soft core porn or worse. It is sort of in btw. soft porn and hardcore porn. It is kind of shocking to watch such a big celebrity in a porn video.

I wonder if she will be mortified if her children ever watch it. I wonder if her siblings teased her about it. I wonder if Kanye has watched it (probably).

Isn't it odd that 30 years ago, Playboy was risque and now, a huge celebrity has a sex tape that anyone can watch anytime for free on their computer. There she is - Kim K - totally naked and totally doing it with her boyfriend.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why are you people discussing her 10+ year old sex tape instead of the fact this whole robbery was likely faked?

Agree.
Wondering if the story is made up or probably embellished. I'm thinking she's pulling a Ryan Locte.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are you people discussing her 10+ year old sex tape instead of the fact this whole robbery was likely faked?

Agree.
Wondering if the story is made up or probably embellished. I'm thinking she's pulling a Ryan Locte.

Very likely, considering how much in common they have. For example how into themselves and their looks they are and, of course, their IQ.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn't Kim K have won a lawsuit?

I would think that if someone made a sex tape, they would have an expectation of privacy and would easily win a lawsuit to prevent the release of the tape.

This is why I think maybe Kim is lying and did want the tape released. She is an exhibitionist clearly. She loves her body and loves to show it off.

I finally watched the darn video yesterday. I was wondering if it was soft core porn or worse. It is sort of in btw. soft porn and hardcore porn. It is kind of shocking to watch such a big celebrity in a porn video.

I wonder if she will be mortified if her children ever watch it. I wonder if her siblings teased her about it. I wonder if Kanye has watched it (probably).

Isn't it odd that 30 years ago, Playboy was risque and now, a huge celebrity has a sex tape that anyone can watch anytime for free on their computer. There she is - Kim K - totally naked and totally doing it with her boyfriend.

See: Pamela Anderson and Tommy Lee.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn't Kim K have won a lawsuit?

I would think that if someone made a sex tape, they would have an expectation of privacy and would easily win a lawsuit to prevent the release of the tape.

This is why I think maybe Kim is lying and did want the tape released. She is an exhibitionist clearly. She loves her body and loves to show it off.

I finally watched the darn video yesterday. I was wondering if it was soft core porn or worse. It is sort of in btw. soft porn and hardcore porn. It is kind of shocking to watch such a big celebrity in a porn video.

I wonder if she will be mortified if her children ever watch it. I wonder if her siblings teased her about it. I wonder if Kanye has watched it (probably).

Isn't it odd that 30 years ago, Playboy was risque and now, a huge celebrity has a sex tape that anyone can watch anytime for free on their computer. There she is - Kim K - totally naked and totally doing it with her boyfriend.

See: Pamela Anderson and Tommy Lee.

Verne Troyer managed to stop his tape from being distributed. If he can do it, I think Kim could.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why are you people discussing her 10+ year old sex tape instead of the fact this whole robbery was likely faked?

Very likely faked. Which also fits her and her family perfectly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are you people discussing her 10+ year old sex tape instead of the fact this whole robbery was likely faked?

Very likely faked. Which also fits her and her family perfectly.

What's the evidence for it being faked? I thought a nail salon security camera captured the robbers' getaway, no?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are you people discussing her 10+ year old sex tape instead of the fact this whole robbery was likely faked?

Very likely faked. Which also fits her and her family perfectly.

What's the evidence for it being faked? I thought a nail salon security camera captured the robbers' getaway, no?

Look at what we know as far as circumstantial evidence:

- her family OWNS a house in France, but she chose to stay in a hotel instead?

- she flaunted both her jewels' value AND her exact location on social media weeks in advance

-she stayed at the hotel with zero - as in none at all - security after advertising her location to be world, and

-just like the movies, she easily wriggles out of her hand restraints immediately upon that's so called "robbers" departure.

It was faked.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn't Kim K have won a lawsuit?

I would think that if someone made a sex tape, they would have an expectation of privacy and would easily win a lawsuit to prevent the release of the tape.

This is why I think maybe Kim is lying and did want the tape released. She is an exhibitionist clearly. She loves her body and loves to show it off.

I finally watched the darn video yesterday. I was wondering if it was soft core porn or worse. It is sort of in btw. soft porn and hardcore porn. It is kind of shocking to watch such a big celebrity in a porn video.

I wonder if she will be mortified if her children ever watch it. I wonder if her siblings teased her about it. I wonder if Kanye has watched it (probably).

Isn't it odd that 30 years ago, Playboy was risque and now, a huge celebrity has a sex tape that anyone can watch anytime for free on their computer. There she is - Kim K - totally naked and totally doing it with her boyfriend.

See: Pamela Anderson and Tommy Lee.

Who?
Verne Troyer managed to stop his tape from being distributed. If he can do it, I think Kim could.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn't Kim K have won a lawsuit?

I would think that if someone made a sex tape, they would have an expectation of privacy and would easily win a lawsuit to prevent the release of the tape.

This is why I think maybe Kim is lying and did want the tape released. She is an exhibitionist clearly. She loves her body and loves to show it off.

I finally watched the darn video yesterday. I was wondering if it was soft core porn or worse. It is sort of in btw. soft porn and hardcore porn. It is kind of shocking to watch such a big celebrity in a porn video.

I wonder if she will be mortified if her children ever watch it. I wonder if her siblings teased her about it. I wonder if Kanye has watched it (probably).

Isn't it odd that 30 years ago, Playboy was risque and now, a huge celebrity has a sex tape that anyone can watch anytime for free on their computer. There she is - Kim K - totally naked and totally doing it with her boyfriend.

See: Pamela Anderson and Tommy Lee.

Verne Troyer managed to stop his tape from being distributed. If he can do it, I think Kim could.

That tape was distributed and is online

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn't Kim K have won a lawsuit?

I would think that if someone made a sex tape, they would have an expectation of privacy and would easily win a lawsuit to prevent the release of the tape.

This is why I think maybe Kim is lying and did want the tape released. She is an exhibitionist clearly. She loves her body and loves to show it off.

I finally watched the darn video yesterday. I was wondering if it was soft core porn or worse. It is sort of in btw. soft porn and hardcore porn. It is kind of shocking to watch such a big celebrity in a porn video.

I wonder if she will be mortified if her children ever watch it. I wonder if her siblings teased her about it. I wonder if Kanye has watched it (probably).

Isn't it odd that 30 years ago, Playboy was risque and now, a huge celebrity has a sex tape that anyone can watch anytime for free on their computer. There she is - Kim K - totally naked and totally doing it with her boyfriend.

See: Pamela Anderson and Tommy Lee.

Verne Troyer managed to stop his tape from being distributed. If he can do it, I think Kim could.

That tape was distributed and is online

Kim was part of the decision to sell the porn tape.

She sold her body for money.

Prostitute?

You decide.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are you people discussing her 10+ year old sex tape instead of the fact this whole robbery was likely faked?

Very likely faked. Which also fits her and her family perfectly.

What's the evidence for it being faked? I thought a nail salon security camera captured the robbers' getaway, no?

Look at what we know as far as circumstantial evidence:

- her family OWNS a house in France, but she chose to stay in a hotel instead?

- she flaunted both her jewels' value AND her exact location on social media weeks in advance

-she stayed at the hotel with zero - as in none at all - security after advertising her location to be world, and

-just like the movies, she easily wriggles out of her hand restraints immediately upon that's so called "robbers" departure.

It was faked.

Her sister discussed on the show at one point having a fake robbery of the younger sister. They showed a clip of it on the news.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are you people discussing her 10+ year old sex tape instead of the fact this whole robbery was likely faked?

Very likely faked. Which also fits her and her family perfectly.

What's the evidence for it being faked? I thought a nail salon security camera captured the robbers' getaway, no?

Look at what we know as far as circumstantial evidence:

- her family OWNS a house in France, but she chose to stay in a hotel instead?

- she flaunted both her jewels' value AND her exact location on social media weeks in advance

-she stayed at the hotel with zero - as in none at all - security after advertising her location to be world, and

-just like the movies, she easily wriggles out of her hand restraints immediately upon that's so called "robbers" departure.

It was faked.

And where was her personal security entourage? She doesn't even get out of the car and walk 10 feet to the entrance of anywhere without security so I can't imagine she was without security...rumor has it her body guard was handcuffed- really? Someone with gigantic biceps got handcuffed by "robbers"? And doesn't she have a security team?

The flaunting the jewels thing seemed really fishy too. I know she likes to boast, brag, and be narcissistic, but the video was really too, obviously, out there.

And getting tied up? Really? Sounds like she's watched too many Lifetime movies.

[Anonymous]

Plus one on the faked robbery. Too many gaping holes here.