What are the ways you'll resist?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:All these ridiculous posts.

Resistance is futile. Continue down this path and the GOP will win again in 2028.

I voted for Harris as an anti-Trumper...he won't be in the picture in 2028.

Unless the Democratic party does some serious self-reflection and puts forth a moderate candidate that appeals to the majority, that appeals to those who voted third-party, that can get those who decided not to vote to come out and vote....they will lose. Because I for one will mostly likely vote Red.


Just tired of Democrats refusing to do any self-reflection and denying why Harris lost.

Refusing to visit any red states isn't really going to help.


No, you just want to see the liber.al tears and you are not getting them.



DP. Are you joking? Liberals are playing true to type, as ever. Moaning, groaning, whining, b****ing, insulting, you name it. The PP is correct. Grow up and engage in some self-reflection, for once in your lives.


Oh, yes, no conservative has ever engaged in these things.

Do you ever tire of your hypocrisy? Do you even hear yourself and think “Well, I sound like a hypocrite” No?

What a surprise.


This board has been four years of them whining about everything. And when they don't get the big freakout they've been waiting for, they whine about that.


It's tiresome, but you have to let them feel those feelings. Big mad, and no outlet.

They'll settle down. Maybe they need some juice and a cookie.
Anonymous
DP - I am worried about losing a lot of feds. I don’t think people understand there are many many ways they make our life better.

Also having Elon Musk in charge of the purge is worrying. I remember when Tesla had horrific stories of workers being injured on the job due to highly pressurized
working conditions and not receiving any compensation.

The Total Recordable Incidence Rate (TRIR) at Tesla's Fremont plant was 31 percent higher than the industry average. In data compiled by Forbes, from 2014-2018, Tesla has collected over triple the amount of Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) violations than its top 10 rivals. As a result, Tesla has been fined $236,730 for 54 different violations

Who will be watching the chicken house with the fox in charge of removing worker safety regulations ?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:All these ridiculous posts.

Resistance is futile. Continue down this path and the GOP will win again in 2028.

I voted for Harris as an anti-Trumper...he won't be in the picture in 2028.

Unless the Democratic party does some serious self-reflection and puts forth a moderate candidate that appeals to the majority, that appeals to those who voted third-party, that can get those who decided not to vote to come out and vote....they will lose. Because I for one will mostly likely vote Red.


Just tired of Democrats refusing to do any self-reflection and denying why Harris lost.

Refusing to visit any red states isn't really going to help.


What is it with all these “democrats go sit in the corner and reflect on how naughty you’ve been” posts?

The Democratic Party ran on a perfectly reasonable (and achievable) platform of opportunity for everyone. It was rejected.

The GOP ran on no taxes, deflation, mass deportation and protecting women. Doesn’t seem like that is going to be great for the country and most Harris voters don’t need to reflect on the fact that they disagree with it.


MAGA needing a fix. Unfortunately the pressure of actual responsibility without anyone to hide behind is coming straight at them, so they do what addicts do. Try to avoid the stress by dipping into the sauce.

Sad, but what can you do.
Anonymous
[img]
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Liberal tears is so entertaining.


Point some out when you see them.


They are trying really hard to wish this into existence, and their bafflement at not being able to stick it to the libs is incredibly entertaining


Agree they seem more upset and angry than the left by far. It’s weird considering.

It’s fear. In every post trying to take Dems temperature. We’re not disclosing our little secrets. We’ve fired our Republican wealth managers. Not spending money on maga businesses. Supporting legit disruptors. Not worrying. Not responsible.


We must punish our fellow Americans for voting the way they want to! What the heck are they thinking? Voting for a candidate who isn’t a democrat? TREASON.

Sure, pretend his political party affiliation is the problem, not the sexual assault and other crimes, compulsive lying (including The Big Lie), fomenting an attempted insurrection, refusal to put his pride aside and publicly embrace the peaceful transfer of power, idolization of authoritarians, corruption, nepotism, general incompetence, stunning ignorance, shattering of norms, mental deterioration, and advanced age.

Trump is not like anyone else. There are Republicans we would disagree with and vote against, but Donald J. Trump is truly in a class by himself. He’s not just an undesirable candidate; he is an amalgamation of everything that could possibly be wrong with a candidate.

Get out of here with your gaslighting.


Things will get interesting in this place when Trump revives Schedule F, Strips civil service protections from tens of thousands of federal, and fires 500,000 federal employees. So, we will see about the resistance of the parasites


You know they can find better paying work in the private sector, right? You’re choosing the weirdest stuff to fantasize about. It really seems like Trump has made you people either unwilling to use critical thought, or just plain dumber.

As a former Fed, I can tell you that this is false. A small percentage of Feds have skills relevant to the private sector but the vast majority do not. Federal pay is generally quite competitive with private salaries except for specialized skills like tech and the combined package of salary, benefits and job security is really unmatched.


That is not true. I knew many many feds who were lawyers and economists who worked revolving doors between private and public sectors. The public sector gave them skills that helped them earn way more in the private sector.

Again, as I said, there are very few specialized skills where private compensation is higher. Lawyers is one of the jobs. However, within the legal field DOJ jobs are highly coveted for their hours, job security, prestige with a decent pay package. I would whole heartedly disagree with you about economists.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:All these ridiculous posts.

Resistance is futile. Continue down this path and the GOP will win again in 2028.

I voted for Harris as an anti-Trumper...he won't be in the picture in 2028.

Unless the Democratic party does some serious self-reflection and puts forth a moderate candidate that appeals to the majority, that appeals to those who voted third-party, that can get those who decided not to vote to come out and vote....they will lose. Because I for one will mostly likely vote Red.


Just tired of Democrats refusing to do any self-reflection and denying why Harris lost.

Refusing to visit any red states isn't really going to help.


What is it with all these “democrats go sit in the corner and reflect on how naughty you’ve been” posts?

The Democratic Party ran on a perfectly reasonable (and achievable) platform of opportunity for everyone. It was rejected.

The GOP ran on no taxes, deflation, mass deportation and protecting women. Doesn’t seem like that is going to be great for the country and most Harris voters don’t need to reflect on the fact that they disagree with it.


What was holding up the achievable platform of opportunity over the last four years?
Anonymous
I'm planning to resist by not protesting, not posting on X, not doing anything at all except totally ignoring the orange blob and his minions. That stuff didn't work the first time, and they love it because it just gives them something to rail about and lie about. Maybe if we ignore him he'll get bored and go away.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:All these ridiculous posts.

Resistance is futile. Continue down this path and the GOP will win again in 2028.

I voted for Harris as an anti-Trumper...he won't be in the picture in 2028.

Unless the Democratic party does some serious self-reflection and puts forth a moderate candidate that appeals to the majority, that appeals to those who voted third-party, that can get those who decided not to vote to come out and vote....they will lose. Because I for one will mostly likely vote Red.


Just tired of Democrats refusing to do any self-reflection and denying why Harris lost.

Refusing to visit any red states isn't really going to help.


What is it with all these “democrats go sit in the corner and reflect on how naughty you’ve been” posts?

The Democratic Party ran on a perfectly reasonable (and achievable) platform of opportunity for everyone. It was rejected.

The GOP ran on no taxes, deflation, mass deportation and protecting women. Doesn’t seem like that is going to be great for the country and most Harris voters don’t need to reflect on the fact that they disagree with it.


What was holding up the achievable platform of opportunity over the last four years?


Go forth and govern. It's your turn.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:All these ridiculous posts.

Resistance is futile. Continue down this path and the GOP will win again in 2028.

I voted for Harris as an anti-Trumper...he won't be in the picture in 2028.

Unless the Democratic party does some serious self-reflection and puts forth a moderate candidate that appeals to the majority, that appeals to those who voted third-party, that can get those who decided not to vote to come out and vote....they will lose. Because I for one will mostly likely vote Red.


Just tired of Democrats refusing to do any self-reflection and denying why Harris lost.

Refusing to visit any red states isn't really going to help.


What is it with all these “democrats go sit in the corner and reflect on how naughty you’ve been” posts?

The Democratic Party ran on a perfectly reasonable (and achievable) platform of opportunity for everyone. It was rejected.

The GOP ran on no taxes, deflation, mass deportation and protecting women. Doesn’t seem like that is going to be great for the country and most Harris voters don’t need to reflect on the fact that they disagree with it.

People rejected what Harris said because they looked at what the Biden-Harris administration did. There was a massive credibility gap.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:All these ridiculous posts.

Resistance is futile. Continue down this path and the GOP will win again in 2028.

I voted for Harris as an anti-Trumper...he won't be in the picture in 2028.

Unless the Democratic party does some serious self-reflection and puts forth a moderate candidate that appeals to the majority, that appeals to those who voted third-party, that can get those who decided not to vote to come out and vote....they will lose. Because I for one will mostly likely vote Red.


Just tired of Democrats refusing to do any self-reflection and denying why Harris lost.

Refusing to visit any red states isn't really going to help.


What is it with all these “democrats go sit in the corner and reflect on how naughty you’ve been” posts?

The Democratic Party ran on a perfectly reasonable (and achievable) platform of opportunity for everyone. It was rejected.

The GOP ran on no taxes, deflation, mass deportation and protecting women. Doesn’t seem like that is going to be great for the country and most Harris voters don’t need to reflect on the fact that they disagree with it.


What was holding up the achievable platform of opportunity over the last four years?


Go forth and govern. It's your turn.


I mean, right?

They've got executive, legislative, and judicial branches. No excuses. Time to shine, boys. Show us all what you got when you hold all the reins.

Hop to it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I'm planning to resist by not protesting, not posting on X, not doing anything at all except totally ignoring the orange blob and his minions. That stuff didn't work the first time, and they love it because it just gives them something to rail about and lie about. Maybe if we ignore him he'll get bored and go away.


Just have to wait it out. There is no third act coming so every day that goes by is one day closer to Trump being out of politics forever. We've already crossed one thing off that list. No more political rallies for him.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:All these ridiculous posts.

Resistance is futile. Continue down this path and the GOP will win again in 2028.

I voted for Harris as an anti-Trumper...he won't be in the picture in 2028.

Unless the Democratic party does some serious self-reflection and puts forth a moderate candidate that appeals to the majority, that appeals to those who voted third-party, that can get those who decided not to vote to come out and vote....they will lose. Because I for one will mostly likely vote Red.


Just tired of Democrats refusing to do any self-reflection and denying why Harris lost.

Refusing to visit any red states isn't really going to help.


What is it with all these “democrats go sit in the corner and reflect on how naughty you’ve been” posts?

The Democratic Party ran on a perfectly reasonable (and achievable) platform of opportunity for everyone. It was rejected.

The GOP ran on no taxes, deflation, mass deportation and protecting women. Doesn’t seem like that is going to be great for the country and most Harris voters don’t need to reflect on the fact that they disagree with it.

People rejected what Harris said because they looked at what the Biden-Harris administration did. There was a massive credibility gap.


Okay. Time for the GOP to show everyone how to fix it. Let's see what happens.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:[img]
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Liberal tears is so entertaining.


Point some out when you see them.


They are trying really hard to wish this into existence, and their bafflement at not being able to stick it to the libs is incredibly entertaining


Agree they seem more upset and angry than the left by far. It’s weird considering.

It’s fear. In every post trying to take Dems temperature. We’re not disclosing our little secrets. We’ve fired our Republican wealth managers. Not spending money on maga businesses. Supporting legit disruptors. Not worrying. Not responsible.


We must punish our fellow Americans for voting the way they want to! What the heck are they thinking? Voting for a candidate who isn’t a democrat? TREASON.

Sure, pretend his political party affiliation is the problem, not the sexual assault and other crimes, compulsive lying (including The Big Lie), fomenting an attempted insurrection, refusal to put his pride aside and publicly embrace the peaceful transfer of power, idolization of authoritarians, corruption, nepotism, general incompetence, stunning ignorance, shattering of norms, mental deterioration, and advanced age.

Trump is not like anyone else. There are Republicans we would disagree with and vote against, but Donald J. Trump is truly in a class by himself. He’s not just an undesirable candidate; he is an amalgamation of everything that could possibly be wrong with a candidate.

Get out of here with your gaslighting.


Things will get interesting in this place when Trump revives Schedule F, Strips civil service protections from tens of thousands of federal, and fires 500,000 federal employees. So, we will see about the resistance of the parasites


You know they can find better paying work in the private sector, right? You’re choosing the weirdest stuff to fantasize about. It really seems like Trump has made you people either unwilling to use critical thought, or just plain dumber.

As a former Fed, I can tell you that this is false. A small percentage of Feds have skills relevant to the private sector but the vast majority do not. Federal pay is generally quite competitive with private salaries except for specialized skills like tech and the combined package of salary, benefits and job security is really unmatched.


That is not true. I knew many many feds who were lawyers and economists who worked revolving doors between private and public sectors. The public sector gave them skills that helped them earn way more in the private sector.

Again, as I said, there are very few specialized skills where private compensation is higher. Lawyers is one of the jobs. However, within the legal field DOJ jobs are highly coveted for their hours, job security, prestige with a decent pay package. I would whole heartedly disagree with you about economists.


Well I hope you realize that private sectors tend to do much better in countries with strong public sectors. The private sector needs a functional public sector for transporting goods, helping provide healthy and educated (at least to high school) workers, foster fair competition and trade practices and much more.

Empirical evidence shows that countries with larger public sectors also have larger trade shares and a larger share of firms that export.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292123002349#:~:text=First%2C%20a%20larger%20public%20sector,size%20distribution%2C%20higher%20average%20productivity%2C

But having a strong public sector does not mean high public debt- many of the countries with strong but relatively efficient public sectors have low public debts for example,
Government debt to GDP ratios
Estonia: 20.2%
Bulgaria: 22.9%
Luxembourg: 25.5%
Sweden: 31.5%
Denmark: 33.6%
Lithuania: 37.3%
Germany 63.7%
Netherlands 45.1%
And Australia 58%).

Since Trump first round of tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy that ratio went up to 121% for the US.

I know the Trump manifesto is to bring that down by shrinking the public sector - but in my opinion it will likely have a net negative effect on the private sector also, - especially small businesses that make up 99% of American businesses and employ half of private sector workers.

If Trump policies actually do what he promises then great but I am doubtful. For example, he said that he will impose across-the-board tariffs of 10% or 20% on imports coming into the U.S. and higher rates on all Chinese imports. He has also proposed a 100% or 200% tariff on cars made in Mexico and on products made by companies that move manufacturing from the U.S. to Mexico.

But tariffs will make prices go up for U.S. manufacturers, too, if they use foreign-made parts. Further, tariffs on cheap, Chinese-made goods, will add to inflation. Other countries will likely respond by imposing retaliatory tariffs on American made goods, which will hurt exports .

Also if government revenue losses happen, the national debt will rise, resulting in inflation and stress on the economy. High levels of debt lead to increased government interest payments, which can consume a significant portion of the federal budget. Additionally, when the government borrows heavily, it can lead to higher interest rates, thereby raising the cost capital for businesses (and individuals) who want to borrow money. If the debt is financed by printing more money, it can lead to inflation in the economy.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/rohitarora/2024/11/04/how-small-businesses-would-benefit-from-a-trump-presidency/

I am not an economist but appreciate them and their work. I am pretty sure that we are going to need good economists who are not paid by private sector interests to slant things more than ever during Trump 2.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:All these ridiculous posts.

Resistance is futile. Continue down this path and the GOP will win again in 2028.

I voted for Harris as an anti-Trumper...he won't be in the picture in 2028.

Unless the Democratic party does some serious self-reflection and puts forth a moderate candidate that appeals to the majority, that appeals to those who voted third-party, that can get those who decided not to vote to come out and vote....they will lose. Because I for one will mostly likely vote Red.


Just tired of Democrats refusing to do any self-reflection and denying why Harris lost.

Refusing to visit any red states isn't really going to help.


What is it with all these “democrats go sit in the corner and reflect on how naughty you’ve been” posts?

The Democratic Party ran on a perfectly reasonable (and achievable) platform of opportunity for everyone. It was rejected.

The GOP ran on no taxes, deflation, mass deportation and protecting women. Doesn’t seem like that is going to be great for the country and most Harris voters don’t need to reflect on the fact that they disagree with it.

People rejected what Harris said because they looked at what the Biden-Harris administration did. There was a massive credibility gap.


+1
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:[img]
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Liberal tears is so entertaining.


Point some out when you see them.


They are trying really hard to wish this into existence, and their bafflement at not being able to stick it to the libs is incredibly entertaining


Agree they seem more upset and angry than the left by far. It’s weird considering.

It’s fear. In every post trying to take Dems temperature. We’re not disclosing our little secrets. We’ve fired our Republican wealth managers. Not spending money on maga businesses. Supporting legit disruptors. Not worrying. Not responsible.


We must punish our fellow Americans for voting the way they want to! What the heck are they thinking? Voting for a candidate who isn’t a democrat? TREASON.

Sure, pretend his political party affiliation is the problem, not the sexual assault and other crimes, compulsive lying (including The Big Lie), fomenting an attempted insurrection, refusal to put his pride aside and publicly embrace the peaceful transfer of power, idolization of authoritarians, corruption, nepotism, general incompetence, stunning ignorance, shattering of norms, mental deterioration, and advanced age.

Trump is not like anyone else. There are Republicans we would disagree with and vote against, but Donald J. Trump is truly in a class by himself. He’s not just an undesirable candidate; he is an amalgamation of everything that could possibly be wrong with a candidate.

Get out of here with your gaslighting.


Things will get interesting in this place when Trump revives Schedule F, Strips civil service protections from tens of thousands of federal, and fires 500,000 federal employees. So, we will see about the resistance of the parasites


You know they can find better paying work in the private sector, right? You’re choosing the weirdest stuff to fantasize about. It really seems like Trump has made you people either unwilling to use critical thought, or just plain dumber.

As a former Fed, I can tell you that this is false. A small percentage of Feds have skills relevant to the private sector but the vast majority do not. Federal pay is generally quite competitive with private salaries except for specialized skills like tech and the combined package of salary, benefits and job security is really unmatched.


That is not true. I knew many many feds who were lawyers and economists who worked revolving doors between private and public sectors. The public sector gave them skills that helped them earn way more in the private sector.

Again, as I said, there are very few specialized skills where private compensation is higher. Lawyers is one of the jobs. However, within the legal field DOJ jobs are highly coveted for their hours, job security, prestige with a decent pay package. I would whole heartedly disagree with you about economists.


Well I hope you realize that private sectors tend to do much better in countries with strong public sectors. The private sector needs a functional public sector for transporting goods, helping provide healthy and educated (at least to high school) workers, foster fair competition and trade practices and much more.

Empirical evidence shows that countries with larger public sectors also have larger trade shares and a larger share of firms that export.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292123002349#:~:text=First%2C%20a%20larger%20public%20sector,size%20distribution%2C%20higher%20average%20productivity%2C

But having a strong public sector does not mean high public debt- many of the countries with strong but relatively efficient public sectors have low public debts for example,
Government debt to GDP ratios
Estonia: 20.2%
Bulgaria: 22.9%
Luxembourg: 25.5%
Sweden: 31.5%
Denmark: 33.6%
Lithuania: 37.3%
Germany 63.7%
Netherlands 45.1%
And Australia 58%).

Since Trump first round of tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy that ratio went up to 121% for the US.

I know the Trump manifesto is to bring that down by shrinking the public sector - but in my opinion it will likely have a net negative effect on the private sector also, - especially small businesses that make up 99% of American businesses and employ half of private sector workers.

If Trump policies actually do what he promises then great but I am doubtful. For example, he said that he will impose across-the-board tariffs of 10% or 20% on imports coming into the U.S. and higher rates on all Chinese imports. He has also proposed a 100% or 200% tariff on cars made in Mexico and on products made by companies that move manufacturing from the U.S. to Mexico.

But tariffs will make prices go up for U.S. manufacturers, too, if they use foreign-made parts. Further, tariffs on cheap, Chinese-made goods, will add to inflation. Other countries will likely respond by imposing retaliatory tariffs on American made goods, which will hurt exports .

Also if government revenue losses happen, the national debt will rise, resulting in inflation and stress on the economy. High levels of debt lead to increased government interest payments, which can consume a significant portion of the federal budget. Additionally, when the government borrows heavily, it can lead to higher interest rates, thereby raising the cost capital for businesses (and individuals) who want to borrow money. If the debt is financed by printing more money, it can lead to inflation in the economy.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/rohitarora/2024/11/04/how-small-businesses-would-benefit-from-a-trump-presidency/

I am not an economist but appreciate them and their work. I am pretty sure that we are going to need good economists who are not paid by private sector interests to slant things more than ever during Trump 2.



Or, we could cut wasteful government spending, which skyrocketed under Harris/biden (AKA - Obama’s third term).


Show us what you got, MAGA! You know how to do everything better and more efficiently. Energy prices down 50% in less than 12 months and grocery prices down!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:All these ridiculous posts.

Resistance is futile. Continue down this path and the GOP will win again in 2028.

I voted for Harris as an anti-Trumper...he won't be in the picture in 2028.

Unless the Democratic party does some serious self-reflection and puts forth a moderate candidate that appeals to the majority, that appeals to those who voted third-party, that can get those who decided not to vote to come out and vote....they will lose. Because I for one will mostly likely vote Red.


Just tired of Democrats refusing to do any self-reflection and denying why Harris lost.

Refusing to visit any red states isn't really going to help.


What is it with all these “democrats go sit in the corner and reflect on how naughty you’ve been” posts?

The Democratic Party ran on a perfectly reasonable (and achievable) platform of opportunity for everyone. It was rejected.

The GOP ran on no taxes, deflation, mass deportation and protecting women. Doesn’t seem like that is going to be great for the country and most Harris voters don’t need to reflect on the fact that they disagree with it.

People rejected what Harris said because they looked at what the Biden-Harris administration did. There was a massive credibility gap.


+1


Thank god Trump's walking into this next term with all the credibility of your mama and totally unlikely to piss that away. Whew, amirite?
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: