As a parent, I don't want my kid in a class with someone that has harmed a teacher and I think the majority would agree with me. So if a kid has actually harmed a teacher, why are there no consequences? This is what I don't understand. So for instance, a kid throws something at or hits a teacher intentionally, are you saying that nothing happens and the kid just returns to school the next day? |
You'd be wrong. That's part of the problem. It is nearly impossible to get a kid "kicked out" of their base school, especially if parents don't agree to a change in placement. Teaching is probably the only job on earth where you're expected to welcome someone who hits, bites, kicks, or threatens you back into the classroom the next day with a smile on your face and pretend like nothing happened. And then you get blamed if it happens again. Yes, some positions should pay more. Anyone arguing against that hasn't worked in one of the critical shortage areas. |
Who decided that this is how it is? I don't want kids that hit,kick, or harm anyone in a class with my kid. There is no place for that in a school. |
I didn’t say that, but yes, that happens. |
It depends on the case but if there is no marks/injuries I would say that is typically the case, but it really depends on the circumstances. |
It’s primary the districts (and laws protecting kids with special needs), but I suspect some portion of parents feel this way - specifically the parents of the children causing harm. |
If I was teaching and a kid hit me, I would refuse to go back until the kid was not in my class any more. if enough teachers did this, then I suspect something would have to be done. |
At best they will become another teachers problem and you now have a bad relationship with admin and potentially the other teacher that now has that child. |
In theory, you're right. In practice, bills don't pay themselves and most administrators are not your friends. Look at how this has played out in Newport News. A student who had been physically violent toward staff in the past flashed a gun to a classmate. The teachers who reported him were ignored by their admin. He then shot his teacher and the school district is trying to claim it's an expected hazard that comes with the job. |
It’s true that teachers are leaving the profession, but it’s also true that it’s taking several months to find another job. They still need a salary. Violent kids aren’t in every classroom, but closer to 1-2 per school. They’d either fire the teacher or move the kid to another classroom. |
How can we get the school board to adopt a zero tolerance for violence policy? I once talked to someone that taught at an alternative school. It was privately run and there were several of them. I recall her saying that one was in Alexandria and one in Manassas, I don't recall the name but she told me that it was a year round school and that fcps had a contract with them and would send kids there that had challenges and could not function in a typical school. |
All of those schools have waitlists, we can’t just send them there and they start the next day. It takes meetings with the FCPS disciplinary committee and lots of documentation. And if they have an IEP, all of that work times 10. These aren’t quick fix problems. |
Sounds laborious, but no one said next day. I am wondering what schools will do that have many sped vacancies? |
No, kids are not kicked out for harming teachers almost ever. It would have to be incredibly severe, such as breaking an arm or a stabbing to be kicked out. But a kid punching staff won't get them kicked out. Spitting in staff members' faces might be a visit to the office, nothing more. Hitting and kicking staff? Nothing. |
As a teacher I have always believed in free education to anyone and everyone but what I have seen in schools makes me consider putting my own kids in private. The school system needs big changes because it’s running itself into the ground. |