Spotify dropped Harry and Markle

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t get it.

They fancy themselves as do-gooder philanthropists yet they are shilling for a luxury brand?

And why would Dior want them? Why hire someone who is mostly ridiculed and couldn’t generate a sufficient following for a podcast?

I just don’t get it.

It makes no sense because it makes no sense. She’s unpopular outside of a small, terminally online set of lunatics. What high profile events does she attend where Dior would get increased visibility? Movie premieres? Spotify or Netflix events? Publicized charitable tours to other countries or to events other than I guess school shooting active crime scenes? That must be it… glamorous!

It’s not happening.

As (usually!) a lurker on these MM threads, trust me, the anti-MM folks, to include you, come off as the lunatics. If you looked up “lives rent free in your head,” this entire thread would be a perfect example. Weighing in with detailed scenarios and insight as if you personally know any of these people or have any clue as to what’s going on behind closed doors among the royal family. So bizarre - to a level of creepy.

Oh, get over yourself. Like someone else wrote- it’s a sporting event. You’re much more worked up than the rest of us.

Have you even read the thread? Not even remotely.

I’ll tell you what, though. You all have cornered the marked on obsession.

[not PP]

[Anonymous]

^cornered the market

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t get it.

They fancy themselves as do-gooder philanthropists yet they are shilling for a luxury brand?

And why would Dior want them? Why hire someone who is mostly ridiculed and couldn’t generate a sufficient following for a podcast?

I just don’t get it.

It makes no sense because it makes no sense. She’s unpopular outside of a small, terminally online set of lunatics. What high profile events does she attend where Dior would get increased visibility? Movie premieres? Spotify or Netflix events? Publicized charitable tours to other countries or to events other than I guess school shooting active crime scenes? That must be it… glamorous!

It’s not happening.

As (usually!) a lurker on these MM threads, trust me, the anti-MM folks, to include you, come off as the lunatics. If you looked up “lives rent free in your head,” this entire thread would be a perfect example. Weighing in with detailed scenarios and insight as if you personally know any of these people or have any clue as to what’s going on behind closed doors among the royal family. So bizarre - to a level of creepy.

Oh, get over yourself. Like someone else wrote- it’s a sporting event. You’re much more worked up than the rest of us.

Have you even read the thread? Not even remotely.

I’ll tell you what, though. You all have cornered the marked on obsession.

[not PP]

Please. You don't know Meghan or Harry. What do you care if people are talking about them and what the future might hold for them? It has no bearing on you in any way. There are plenty of other threads you can participate in if this one isn't your cup of tea.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t get it.

They fancy themselves as do-gooder philanthropists yet they are shilling for a luxury brand?

And why would Dior want them? Why hire someone who is mostly ridiculed and couldn’t generate a sufficient following for a podcast?

I just don’t get it.

It makes no sense because it makes no sense. She’s unpopular outside of a small, terminally online set of lunatics. What high profile events does she attend where Dior would get increased visibility? Movie premieres? Spotify or Netflix events? Publicized charitable tours to other countries or to events other than I guess school shooting active crime scenes? That must be it… glamorous!

It’s not happening.

As (usually!) a lurker on these MM threads, trust me, the anti-MM folks, to include you, come off as the lunatics. If you looked up “lives rent free in your head,” this entire thread would be a perfect example. Weighing in with detailed scenarios and insight as if you personally know any of these people or have any clue as to what’s going on behind closed doors among the royal family. So bizarre - to a level of creepy.

Oh, get over yourself. Like someone else wrote- it’s a sporting event. You’re much more worked up than the rest of us.

Have you even read the thread? Not even remotely.

I’ll tell you what, though. You all have cornered the marked on obsession.

[not PP]

Please. You don't know Meghan or Harry. What do you care if people are talking about them and what the future might hold for them? It has no bearing on you in any way. There are plenty of other threads you can participate in if this one isn't your cup of tea.

I’m fascinated by your crazy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t get it.

They fancy themselves as do-gooder philanthropists yet they are shilling for a luxury brand?

And why would Dior want them? Why hire someone who is mostly ridiculed and couldn’t generate a sufficient following for a podcast?

I just don’t get it.

It makes no sense because it makes no sense. She’s unpopular outside of a small, terminally online set of lunatics. What high profile events does she attend where Dior would get increased visibility? Movie premieres? Spotify or Netflix events? Publicized charitable tours to other countries or to events other than I guess school shooting active crime scenes? That must be it… glamorous!

It’s not happening.

As (usually!) a lurker on these MM threads, trust me, the anti-MM folks, to include you, come off as the lunatics. If you looked up “lives rent free in your head,” this entire thread would be a perfect example. Weighing in with detailed scenarios and insight as if you personally know any of these people or have any clue as to what’s going on behind closed doors among the royal family. So bizarre - to a level of creepy.

Oh, get over yourself. Like someone else wrote- it’s a sporting event. You’re much more worked up than the rest of us.

Have you even read the thread? Not even remotely.

I’ll tell you what, though. You all have cornered the marked on obsession.

[not PP]

Please. You don't know Meghan or Harry. What do you care if people are talking about them and what the future might hold for them? It has no bearing on you in any way. There are plenty of other threads you can participate in if this one isn't your cup of tea.

I’m fascinated by your crazy.

That’s your issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t get it.

They fancy themselves as do-gooder philanthropists yet they are shilling for a luxury brand?

And why would Dior want them? Why hire someone who is mostly ridiculed and couldn’t generate a sufficient following for a podcast?

I just don’t get it.

It makes no sense because it makes no sense. She’s unpopular outside of a small, terminally online set of lunatics. What high profile events does she attend where Dior would get increased visibility? Movie premieres? Spotify or Netflix events? Publicized charitable tours to other countries or to events other than I guess school shooting active crime scenes? That must be it… glamorous!

It’s not happening.

As (usually!) a lurker on these MM threads, trust me, the anti-MM folks, to include you, come off as the lunatics. If you looked up “lives rent free in your head,” this entire thread would be a perfect example. Weighing in with detailed scenarios and insight as if you personally know any of these people or have any clue as to what’s going on behind closed doors among the royal family. So bizarre - to a level of creepy.

Oh, get over yourself. Like someone else wrote- it’s a sporting event. You’re much more worked up than the rest of us.

Have you even read the thread? Not even remotely.

I’ll tell you what, though. You all have cornered the marked on obsession.

[not PP]

Please. You don't know Meghan or Harry. What do you care if people are talking about them and what the future might hold for them? It has no bearing on you in any way. There are plenty of other threads you can participate in if this one isn't your cup of tea.

I’m fascinated by your crazy.

That sounds healthy and normal. But, you do you.

[Anonymous]

Keep going, MM haters.

Please don’t let my interruptions stop you all. Watching you all is like a study study of psychological disorders.

[Anonymous]

Np on this thread, finding it quite humorous that people have spent twenty pages arguing that no one is interested in Harry and Meghan. Talk about lack of self awareness.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Np on this thread, finding it quite humorous that people have spent twenty pages arguing that no one is interested in Harry and Meghan. Talk about lack of self awareness.

Right…

There should be clinical trials on these people. 😆😆

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Np on this thread, finding it quite humorous that people have spent twenty pages arguing that no one is interested in Harry and Meghan. Talk about lack of self awareness.

They love to hate them.

That doesn’t make them good spokesmen for any brand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Np on this thread, finding it quite humorous that people have spent twenty pages arguing that no one is interested in Harry and Meghan. Talk about lack of self awareness.

Right…

There should be clinical trials on these people. 😆😆

And the people who love to hate them. Like you. How are you different?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Np on this thread, finding it quite humorous that people have spent twenty pages arguing that no one is interested in Harry and Meghan. Talk about lack of self awareness.

Tell us why their projects keep flopping then. You know you want to talk about this as much as everyone else here. Funny how you think you’re above it. But here you are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lol, like the BRF aren’t the original grifters. They have no power, they’re a tourist attraction, and their subjects foot the bill. As an American I enjoy watching their spectacles but I’m not the one paying for it with my tax dollars.

There is no need for a spare in 2023. People don’t randomly die anymore, and anyone abdicating would cause the end of the scheme. Harry doesn’t matter for the monarchy so I don’t get why so many people are taking his comments so personally. The man is set financially because he (really, his wife) lives rent free in so many minds. Every click leads to $$.

If only the clicks led to money. Then we wouldn't see so much desperate flailing and attention seeking as their next big idea fizzles out.

Indirectly it sure does. You’re keeping them in the mainstream. I don’t think they’ll have the same level success, but everyone laughed at the Kardashians at first. Then they laughed all the way to the bank. Stop giving them so much attention if you really want them to go away. Resurfaced old news about Harry and Meghan has generated 17 pages here but nobody even bothered starting a discussion on Charles’s first trouping of the colour.

H&M is a DCUM sporting event, nothing more.

Exactly. If the people hung on their every word, the ratings for the podcast wouldn't have been so terrible and they wouldn't have been canceled.

This, exactly.

Dior has Natalie Portman, Charlize Theron, Jennifer Lawrence as faces for the brand. Women who have won awards in their field, in Meghan’s actual field, not that she was ever any good at it. Meghan doesn’t fit at all and it’s lunacy to say otherwise. I don’t think it’s happening, I think she and her fans and for-now agent are “manifesting.” Zendaya and Lupita Nyongo are at the Dior level. No one is going to see a Dior add with Markle simpering back at them, get real. I don’t think WME foresaw Markle being cast out and dissed publicly by Spotify. Should be interesting to see the spin going forward besides this never gonna happen Dior fever dream.

She wasn’t bad. She wasn’t Octavia Spencer, Meryl Streep, et al., but she wasn’t bad. Solid b-list. Much better than you or me.

That's how low your bar is? She's better than you? That's more like Z list than B list.

DP. What bar though? A Dior contract isn’t an acting award. Your whole argument is nonsensical.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lol, like the BRF aren’t the original grifters. They have no power, they’re a tourist attraction, and their subjects foot the bill. As an American I enjoy watching their spectacles but I’m not the one paying for it with my tax dollars.

There is no need for a spare in 2023. People don’t randomly die anymore, and anyone abdicating would cause the end of the scheme. Harry doesn’t matter for the monarchy so I don’t get why so many people are taking his comments so personally. The man is set financially because he (really, his wife) lives rent free in so many minds. Every click leads to $$.

If only the clicks led to money. Then we wouldn't see so much desperate flailing and attention seeking as their next big idea fizzles out.

Indirectly it sure does. You’re keeping them in the mainstream. I don’t think they’ll have the same level success, but everyone laughed at the Kardashians at first. Then they laughed all the way to the bank. Stop giving them so much attention if you really want them to go away. Resurfaced old news about Harry and Meghan has generated 17 pages here but nobody even bothered starting a discussion on Charles’s first trouping of the colour.

H&M is a DCUM sporting event, nothing more.

Exactly. If the people hung on their every word, the ratings for the podcast wouldn't have been so terrible and they wouldn't have been canceled.

This, exactly.

Dior has Natalie Portman, Charlize Theron, Jennifer Lawrence as faces for the brand. Women who have won awards in their field, in Meghan’s actual field, not that she was ever any good at it. Meghan doesn’t fit at all and it’s lunacy to say otherwise. I don’t think it’s happening, I think she and her fans and for-now agent are “manifesting.” Zendaya and Lupita Nyongo are at the Dior level. No one is going to see a Dior add with Markle simpering back at them, get real. I don’t think WME foresaw Markle being cast out and dissed publicly by Spotify. Should be interesting to see the spin going forward besides this never gonna happen Dior fever dream.

She wasn’t bad. She wasn’t Octavia Spencer, Meryl Streep, et al., but she wasn’t bad. Solid b-list. Much better than you or me.

That's how low your bar is? She's better than you? That's more like Z list than B list.

DP. What bar though? A Dior contract isn’t an acting award. Your whole argument is nonsensical.

Its an entertainment forum. Are you lost?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Np on this thread, finding it quite humorous that people have spent twenty pages arguing that no one is interested in Harry and Meghan. Talk about lack of self awareness.

Right…

There should be clinical trials on these people. 😆😆

And the people who love to hate them. Like you. How are you different?

What are you even talking about?

I guess MM haters have trouble with logical flow.

Y’all are wild. It’s actually funny.