Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 5

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG. I just watched this. She claims Kavanaugh was wearing "his Georgetown Prep uniform" when she met him. Um, there IS NO GP UNIFORM. A jacket and tie, but no uniform. She said she thinks he was "proud" of his uniform. Wow, that's not a lie at all. She's *completely* believable.

You literally just described a school uniform.

A bunch of boys prep schools have the uniform of a jacket and tie. How would it identify Georgetown Prep vs an entirely different boys school?

Exactly. The way she describes it makes it sound very specific to Georgetown Prep. She said, "He was obviously very proud of it." It's so obvious she's scrambling to sound credible.

It was his team uniform

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

LOL,when questioned what she was doing at HS parties at the age of 20/21 she said that the people at these parties were "mixed age" with people anywhere between "15/16 to 25...maybe more". 15 year old Catholic prep-school kids hanging out with 25+ year old adults from Gaithersburg on 10 different instances? Right....

I time stamped the point in the interview if anybody wants a good laugh.

https://youtu.be/hq_aFCg6bKY?t=150

This is what certain people think should end a man's career? Sad that some people take her seriously. In the end though she probably helped secure Kavanaugh's confirmation. Susan Collins specifically cited Swetnick when she stated that the presumption of innocence needs to be maintained and announced she would vote yes on the confirmation.

I agree. And I applaud Collins for having the sense to know when a smear campaign is afoot, as opposed to credible allegations.

Collins? Sense? No, that's not what Collins has.

Oh, it absolutely is. She has more sense in her pinkie finger than all of the Democratic senators combined.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And then she totally retracts her sworn statement where she said Kavanaugh and Judge spiked the punch bowl. Now she says merely, they were "near" the punch bowl. Sorry, this woman is lying. Anyone who insists otherwise just looks idiotic.

No she did not.

You can quibble about the word "retract" but she definitely modified her statement to be more moderate and changed it from Kavanaugh being some drug-raping maniac to being at the same party she was.

https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/watch/julie-swetnick-speaks-about-alleged-behavior-by-judge-kavanaugh-1334265923929?v=raila&

[Anonymous]

Number 3

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/christine-blasey-ford-peter-strzok/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean how can people jump on Whelan for smearing a citizen's name without proof but not Ford for doing the same thing? Note how the article calls telling Ford that she's lying is "ugly business" as if it's not possible in this day and age to even say or think this after hearing testimony.

Ford was the victim. She has the right to say who attacked her. Whelan was not there, he was not the victim, he was the heavy hitter the GOP brought in to make up an alternative story line.

No, she is not a victim. It was never determined to be a fact, only an accusation. If there was a way to prove it one way or the other then we could determine who the victim is.

She was the victim.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And yet unfortunately the liberals decided not to focus on these things but instead of an allegation of sexual assault that had zero evidence to back it up.

Zero evidence? Julie Swetnick is a woman with an impeccable reputation. She was at 10 parties where Kavanaugh was spiking the punch bowl and gang raping women. She had 4 witnesses that could back up her story but Trump made sure the FBI would not investigate her claim.

Is this supposed to be a joke. This allegation blew the whole case for the Democrats. Not believable at all.

I know that when I head out to a gang rape, I always pack a punch bowl. It adds a touch of class.

Anybody who thinks that a 20 year old woman who went to Gaithersburg High is going to be hanging out with a bunch of 16-17 year old Georgetown Prep students on 10 different occasions clearly never went to private school in this area.

And punch bowls? What high school party have you ever seen a punch bowl at?

I went to public school in MoCo. While in high school I hung out with many prep school kids - including kids from Georgetown Prep. No crazy animal house parties for us (we were NOT the Brett Kavanaugh type of high schoolers). But we certainly socialized together and we were all kids were from affluent families. I'm not sure why posters are suggesting that it impossible that public school and private school kids didn't mix. Depending on the neighborhood, we certainly did.

Swetnick was 20 years old hanging out with 16-17 year old kids not once but 10 times. There was a spiked punch bowl and a line of guys waiting to rape drunk girls. Where are all the other rape victims? Who continues going to these parties afterwards?

Brock Turner's victim was also in her 20s, a college graduate. Do you think she was lying about being at the frat party?

There were two witnesses who pulled her away so there was proof and it also was reported immediately. Attending a frat party in your early 20's is not the same thing as attending a high school party.

she said they were mixed aged parties and had kids from high school and college.

Yes she did say that and what a credible witness she is. There is not one witness to back her story up. If these boys were doing this to multiple girls there would be more victims. Correct? She also never stated that kavanaugh participated in the rape. He stood by the punch bowl.

She had witnesses who were willing to speak with the FBI.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

LOL,when questioned what she was doing at HS parties at the age of 20/21 she said that the people at these parties were "mixed age" with people anywhere between "15/16 to 25...maybe more". 15 year old Catholic prep-school kids hanging out with 25+ year old adults from Gaithersburg on 10 different instances? Right....

I time stamped the point in the interview if anybody wants a good laugh.

https://youtu.be/hq_aFCg6bKY?t=150

This is what certain people think should end a man's career? Sad that some people take her seriously. In the end though she probably helped secure Kavanaugh's confirmation. Susan Collins specifically cited Swetnick when she stated that the presumption of innocence needs to be maintained and announced she would vote yes on the confirmation.

I agree. And I applaud Collins for having the sense to know when a smear campaign is afoot, as opposed to credible allegations.

Collins? Sense? No, that's not what Collins has.

Oh, it absolutely is. She has more sense in her pinkie finger than all of the Democratic senators combined.

pH, you're talking about Murkowski. I thought we were still talking about Collins.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And then she totally retracts her sworn statement where she said Kavanaugh and Judge spiked the punch bowl. Now she says merely, they were "near" the punch bowl. Sorry, this woman is lying. Anyone who insists otherwise just looks idiotic.

No she did not.

No she did not what? Did you watch the video? She completely backpeddles when asked about the punch bowl. She knows she can't claim they spiked the punch, but by golly, they were standing nearby! And later, the four names she provides as having gone with her to these parties: one says they have no recollection of any of this, one is dead, and two aren't responding. Oh, Julie. What a farce.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean how can people jump on Whelan for smearing a citizen's name without proof but not Ford for doing the same thing? Note how the article calls telling Ford that she's lying is "ugly business" as if it's not possible in this day and age to even say or think this after hearing testimony.

Ford was the victim. She has the right to say who attacked her. Whelan was not there, he was not the victim, he was the heavy hitter the GOP brought in to make up an alternative story line.

No, she is not a victim. It was never determined to be a fact, only an accusation. If there was a way to prove it one way or the other then we could determine who the victim is.

She was the victim.

Of the Democratic Senator from California

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You ask why Dr. Christine -Ford would do this? I’ll give you 4 reasons:
1) she owns a major portion of the company that makes the morning after abortion pill and she is afraid Kavanaugh will overturn Roe v Wade, therefore making her million dollar empire go caput.
2) She’s a professor at the same college (Palo Alto U) where Diane Feinstein’s husband, Richard Blum, is on the board of directors. In fact, she has worked with Blum on the “resist Trump” movement for two years.
3) Dr. Blasey-Ford’s brother, Tom Blasey, is business partners with FBI Agent Peter Strzok’s cousin, Jill Strzok, for a company called Exelis Inc.
4) Feinstein and Chuck Schumer appointed lawyers set up three (3) GoFundMe pages for her the week BEFORE she testified, which are currently up to over a million dollars for her to keep as payment... for her testimony.

And number 4
https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/local/verify-gofundme-pages-for-christine-blasey-ford-legit/65-599932023

Maybe you should wonder about your source of news? I would think you are smarter than this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And yet unfortunately the liberals decided not to focus on these things but instead of an allegation of sexual assault that had zero evidence to back it up.

Zero evidence? Julie Swetnick is a woman with an impeccable reputation. She was at 10 parties where Kavanaugh was spiking the punch bowl and gang raping women. She had 4 witnesses that could back up her story but Trump made sure the FBI would not investigate her claim.

Is this supposed to be a joke. This allegation blew the whole case for the Democrats. Not believable at all.

I know that when I head out to a gang rape, I always pack a punch bowl. It adds a touch of class.

Anybody who thinks that a 20 year old woman who went to Gaithersburg High is going to be hanging out with a bunch of 16-17 year old Georgetown Prep students on 10 different occasions clearly never went to private school in this area.

And punch bowls? What high school party have you ever seen a punch bowl at?

I went to public school in MoCo. While in high school I hung out with many prep school kids - including kids from Georgetown Prep. No crazy animal house parties for us (we were NOT the Brett Kavanaugh type of high schoolers). But we certainly socialized together and we were all kids were from affluent families. I'm not sure why posters are suggesting that it impossible that public school and private school kids didn't mix. Depending on the neighborhood, we certainly did.

Swetnick was 20 years old hanging out with 16-17 year old kids not once but 10 times. There was a spiked punch bowl and a line of guys waiting to rape drunk girls. Where are all the other rape victims? Who continues going to these parties afterwards?

Brock Turner's victim was also in her 20s, a college graduate. Do you think she was lying about being at the frat party?

There were two witnesses who pulled her away so there was proof and it also was reported immediately. Attending a frat party in your early 20's is not the same thing as attending a high school party.

she said they were mixed aged parties and had kids from high school and college.

Yes she did say that and what a credible witness she is. There is not one witness to back her story up. If these boys were doing this to multiple girls there would be more victims. Correct? She also never stated that kavanaugh participated in the rape. He stood by the punch bowl.

She had other witnesses who agreed to talk to the FBI.

NONE of the four "witnesses" she names have corroborated her story. See other post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And yet unfortunately the liberals decided not to focus on these things but instead of an allegation of sexual assault that had zero evidence to back it up.

Zero evidence? Julie Swetnick is a woman with an impeccable reputation. She was at 10 parties where Kavanaugh was spiking the punch bowl and gang raping women. She had 4 witnesses that could back up her story but Trump made sure the FBI would not investigate her claim.

Is this supposed to be a joke. This allegation blew the whole case for the Democrats. Not believable at all.

I know that when I head out to a gang rape, I always pack a punch bowl. It adds a touch of class.

Anybody who thinks that a 20 year old woman who went to Gaithersburg High is going to be hanging out with a bunch of 16-17 year old Georgetown Prep students on 10 different occasions clearly never went to private school in this area.

And punch bowls? What high school party have you ever seen a punch bowl at?

I went to public school in MoCo. While in high school I hung out with many prep school kids - including kids from Georgetown Prep. No crazy animal house parties for us (we were NOT the Brett Kavanaugh type of high schoolers). But we certainly socialized together and we were all kids were from affluent families. I'm not sure why posters are suggesting that it impossible that public school and private school kids didn't mix. Depending on the neighborhood, we certainly did.

Swetnick was 20 years old hanging out with 16-17 year old kids not once but 10 times. There was a spiked punch bowl and a line of guys waiting to rape drunk girls. Where are all the other rape victims? Who continues going to these parties afterwards?

Brock Turner's victim was also in her 20s, a college graduate. Do you think she was lying about being at the frat party?

There were two witnesses who pulled her away so there was proof and it also was reported immediately. Attending a frat party in your early 20's is not the same thing as attending a high school party.

she said they were mixed aged parties and had kids from high school and college.

Yes she did say that and what a credible witness she is. There is not one witness to back her story up. If these boys were doing this to multiple girls there would be more victims. Correct? She also never stated that kavanaugh participated in the rape. He stood by the punch bowl.

She had other witnesses who agreed to talk to the FBI.

Why don't they go report it to the police?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And then she totally retracts her sworn statement where she said Kavanaugh and Judge spiked the punch bowl. Now she says merely, they were "near" the punch bowl. Sorry, this woman is lying. Anyone who insists otherwise just looks idiotic.

No she did not.

No she did not what? Did you watch the video? She completely backpeddles when asked about the punch bowl. She knows she can't claim they spiked the punch, but by golly, they were standing nearby! And later, the four names she provides as having gone with her to these parties: one says they have no recollection of any of this, one is dead, and two aren't responding. Oh, Julie. What a farce.

Did you actually read her sworn statement? She didn't retract anything. She stuck with her sworn statement.
She knew him to be lecherous and grope women - she saw that. She said how she saw him behaving at these parties and what was going on around him. Her sworn statement is important in light of the other two accusations. Also a lot depends on what the other witnesses she has tell the FBI. Hopefully the FBI will do a real investigation in the future.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

LOL,when questioned what she was doing at HS parties at the age of 20/21 she said that the people at these parties were "mixed age" with people anywhere between "15/16 to 25...maybe more". 15 year old Catholic prep-school kids hanging out with 25+ year old adults from Gaithersburg on 10 different instances? Right....

I time stamped the point in the interview if anybody wants a good laugh.

https://youtu.be/hq_aFCg6bKY?t=150

This is what certain people think should end a man's career? Sad that some people take her seriously. In the end though she probably helped secure Kavanaugh's confirmation. Susan Collins specifically cited Swetnick when she stated that the presumption of innocence needs to be maintained and announced she would vote yes on the confirmation.

I agree. And I applaud Collins for having the sense to know when a smear campaign is afoot, as opposed to credible allegations.

Collins? Sense? No, that's not what Collins has.

She had the sense not to fall for this BS story which is more than I can say for a lot of people on this forum.

+100
I'm embarrassed by the desperate grasping at straws here. Pathetic. All one has to do is watch that video to see how completely unbelievable she is. She makes it up as she goes along.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG. I just watched this. She claims Kavanaugh was wearing "his Georgetown Prep uniform" when she met him. Um, there IS NO GP UNIFORM. A jacket and tie, but no uniform. She said she thinks he was "proud" of his uniform. Wow, that's not a lie at all. She's *completely* believable.

You literally just described a school uniform.

A bunch of boys prep schools have the uniform of a jacket and tie. How would it identify Georgetown Prep vs an entirely different boys school?

She said he was wearing a basketball team uniform from his school.

No she didn't. Stop making things up and just watch the video. She babbles on about his "uniform," meaning his school uniform. Which of course, GP does not have.