Donnie Dumptruck says Mar-A-Lago's been searched by the FBI

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Submitting as an exhibit a photo of an array of Top Secret documents juxtaposed with a framed cover of Time Magazine is atomic wedgie grade lawyering.

WTF??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Submitting as an exhibit a photo of an array of Top Secret documents juxtaposed with a framed cover of Time Magazine is atomic wedgie grade lawyering.

WTF??

If it weren’t already obvious, the GOP are not a serious political party. They have been overtaken by MAGA and trolling. It’s assumed Jim Jordan runs this but there are no shortages of Trolls in the elected GOP space.

If you are someone who considers themselves Republican, ask if this is what you want from your political party. It’s never too late to move on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This will go down in the annals of stupendously bad lawyering. Comically bad. They not only managed to fail to preserve any colorable claim of executive privilege (which means Congress could seek the documents from NARA based on a Biden waiver) but also made themselves witnesses to the alleged crime, if not active participants in the concealment and obstruction. Plus one of them now has exposure to a false statements claim. Bravo.

Better yet, in collecting the 15 boxes and materials produced pursuant to the grand jury subpoena, the attorneys had access to TSzSCI and SAP materials for which not even the FBI Case Team and head of the NSD/Counterintelkigence Branch had clearance. WTF were they thinking?

[Anonymous]

Not a lawyer. But this looks like the DoJ really knows what it’s doing and Trump’s lawyers have no clue. Even from the outside, it looks like a serious talent mismatch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

HAHAHAHA! Priorities...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not a lawyer. But this looks like the DoJ really knows what it’s doing and Trump’s lawyers have no clue. Even from the outside, it looks like a serious talent mismatch.

Maybe you are seeing what is portrayed to you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a lawyer. But this looks like the DoJ really knows what it’s doing and Trump’s lawyers have no clue. Even from the outside, it looks like a serious talent mismatch.

Maybe you are seeing what is portrayed to you?

Please name one thing Trump's lawyers have done right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a lawyer. But this looks like the DoJ really knows what it’s doing and Trump’s lawyers have no clue. Even from the outside, it looks like a serious talent mismatch.

Maybe you are seeing what is portrayed to you?

Please name one thing Trump's lawyers have done right.

And again, the point is missed. How would I know and how would you know? Your media sources? Mine? I have made no decisions yet.

[Anonymous]

So how does this play out when they indict him? And if he is eventually convicted? House arrest? Exile? Can we deport him to stand trial at The Hague for other stuff he might be tried for?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Link to attachments https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763.48.1_1.pdf

including this gem

Trump was ordered to appear in front of a grand jury (Attachment C)? That’s new.

That's the subpoena for documents that was served in May. There's a footnote where DOJ got permission from CJ Howell to disclose Grand Jury information.

Trump is screwed. They found classified documents in his office desk

the government seized the contents of a desk drawer that contained
classified documents and governmental records commingled with other documents. The
other documents included two official passports, one of which was expired, and one personal
passport, which was expired. The location of the passports is relevant evidence in an
investigation of unauthorized retention and mishandling of national defense information;
nonetheless, the government decided to return those passports in its discretion.

Also

Although Plaintiff does not specify what material he contends was
seized in excess of the search warrant, certain personal effects were commingled with
classified material in the Seized Evidence, and they remain in the custody of the United States
because of their evidentiary value. Personal effects without evidentiary value wi

ll be returned

I think we are about to see the indictment and prosecution of a former President and imminent Presidential candidate. DOJ has Trump dead to rights and should proceed, regardless of Trump's totally predictable move to declare his candidacy to try and stop the investigation.

This might really do him in with the GOP.

They already started to formally distance themselves from Trump. The problem for the Dems is that it paves the way for DiSantis, who is every bit of a narcissist and fascist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a lawyer. But this looks like the DoJ really knows what it’s doing and Trump’s lawyers have no clue. Even from the outside, it looks like a serious talent mismatch.

Maybe you are seeing what is portrayed to you?

Please name one thing Trump's lawyers have done right.

And again, the point is missed. How would I know and how would you know? Your media sources? Mine? I have made no decisions yet.

Haha, we would know because we are reading the primary sources. You know, legal filings??

[Anonymous]

Note that he’s not claiming any kind of defense on the facts as we are seeing them. He’s not even saying he had no idea the documents were there, which is what I would have expected. He knows they know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a lawyer. But this looks like the DoJ really knows what it’s doing and Trump’s lawyers have no clue. Even from the outside, it looks like a serious talent mismatch.

Maybe you are seeing what is portrayed to you?

Please name one thing Trump's lawyers have done right.

And again, the point is missed. How would I know and how would you know? Your media sources? Mine? I have made no decisions yet.

Read the DOJ filing from last night and the attached exhibits, and then get back to us on that. No "media sources" needed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a lawyer. But this looks like the DoJ really knows what it’s doing and Trump’s lawyers have no clue. Even from the outside, it looks like a serious talent mismatch.

Maybe you are seeing what is portrayed to you?

Please name one thing Trump's lawyers have done right.

And again, the point is missed. How would I know and how would you know? Your media sources? Mine? I have made no decisions yet.

There are primary sources for you to read. Did you read Trump’s motion? Did you read DOJ’s response?

[Anonymous]

The best shot he’s got is probably a pardon from the next GOP POTUS. Might be tough to get if he can’t stop committing crimes. All he had to do was go away quietly and not screw around with national security. It’s amazing to watch someone self-destruct like this. A case study in something.