Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Duke and Queen will pass, Charles will ascend to the throne, William will be the Prince of Wales, and Duke Harry will be a glorified SAHP while Ducbess Meghan builds her American brand while using her kids for Instagram pics and sell products during talk show interviews.

But, will that be enough for Harry?

When will he get restless?

When will he realize he’s playing second fiddle?

How will he feel seeing Will’s kids receiving top notch educations and being photographed doing great things while his kids are surrounded by uncouth American rich kids in a wretched place like La-La-land?

Will he miss Christmas at Sandringham?

And, let’s face it: he’s not aging well. Will Meghan remain faithful? Or, will she trade up at some point?

He's been second fiddle his entire life. Why do you think his kid's won't receive top notch educations? You think Americans cannot educate people? LOL.

He may miss Christmas with his family and it may cause a lot of pain for him to not be welcomed by them as the wounds of this split may not ever fully heal, but the rest of your points are hilariously weird.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So let me get this straight, many of you would prefer for Harry and his family, to sit around "working" for years as royals, until William and Kate ascend to the throne. Then, when William's kids are older, at which point Harry's family would have been pushed out of any position of relevancy. At that point, they would be reliant upon the goodwill of William and Kate for their mere existence. Their own personal wealth would be fairly small and they would have to look to the crown for handouts.

But somehow, that's better than using what he has, which is popularity and a title, to make his own way, forge his own path, and get some money of his own while people are interested. How is that so offensive? It's what any celebrity does, they strike while it's hot.

It makes zero sense to me that people are essentially saying that they would rather they stayed in the BRF as figureheads and basically waited around to be made irrelevant than to do what they are doing. Then those same people say it's because they are HYPOCRITES, THEY WANT TO USE THEIR FAME. Ok...and? It's the publics' fault for being willing to pay for content from certain people over others. If you're going to fault H&M for that, you should similarly fault any "famous" person for the same. It makes no sense.

The British Royal Family is interesting. British princes are interesting. A British prince who wants to leave the royal family and live as a commoner, doing data entry or temping or whatever, is fine but not that interesting. A British prince who wants to leave the royal family but act like a British prince in California? Nope, that's insulting. Anglophiles don't want that, Brits don't want that, and Americans don't want that.

The world would embrace them if they actually worked. But they aren’t working. Their only commodity is themselves. Gross.

At least the Kardashians have legit business ventures. They are business people.

H+M are more akin to Aunt Becky’s social media influencer daughter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think that if William were given a choice, he'd leave too.

You’re a riot! He’s going to be King someday. Harry is the Duke of Santa Barbara.

But what does that even mean these days? Royals don't rule anymore and they barely reign. Royals don't inspire the awe-struck reactions anymore. Society has moved on...without them.

And both William and Harry have said that being the monarch is a job that no one really wants. You actually think that he'd prefer a life of being told what he can and cannot do, can and cannot say? That's the real riot.

Are you saying this as a British person? Because I don't think that's true. Sure, no one is afraid that the wrong word in front of a royal will get you killed. But hierarchy is still very important in British culture.

To people of a certain generation and up...yeah, probably. But to everyone else, no way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So let me get this straight, many of you would prefer for Harry and his family, to sit around "working" for years as royals, until William and Kate ascend to the throne. Then, when William's kids are older, at which point Harry's family would have been pushed out of any position of relevancy. At that point, they would be reliant upon the goodwill of William and Kate for their mere existence. Their own personal wealth would be fairly small and they would have to look to the crown for handouts.

But somehow, that's better than using what he has, which is popularity and a title, to make his own way, forge his own path, and get some money of his own while people are interested. How is that so offensive? It's what any celebrity does, they strike while it's hot.

It makes zero sense to me that people are essentially saying that they would rather they stayed in the BRF as figureheads and basically waited around to be made irrelevant than to do what they are doing. Then those same people say it's because they are HYPOCRITES, THEY WANT TO USE THEIR FAME. Ok...and? It's the publics' fault for being willing to pay for content from certain people over others. If you're going to fault H&M for that, you should similarly fault any "famous" person for the same. It makes no sense.

The British Royal Family is interesting. British princes are interesting. A British prince who wants to leave the royal family and live as a commoner, doing data entry or temping or whatever, is fine but not that interesting. A British prince who wants to leave the royal family but act like a British prince in California? Nope, that's insulting. Anglophiles don't want that, Brits don't want that, and Americans don't want that.

The world would embrace them if they actually worked. But they aren’t working. Their only commodity is themselves. Gross.

At least the Kardashians have legit business ventures. They are business people.

H+M are more akin to Aunt Becky’s social media influencer daughter.

Meghan and Harry represent the worst in modern western culture.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So let me get this straight, many of you would prefer for Harry and his family, to sit around "working" for years as royals, until William and Kate ascend to the throne. Then, when William's kids are older, at which point Harry's family would have been pushed out of any position of relevancy. At that point, they would be reliant upon the goodwill of William and Kate for their mere existence. Their own personal wealth would be fairly small and they would have to look to the crown for handouts.

But somehow, that's better than using what he has, which is popularity and a title, to make his own way, forge his own path, and get some money of his own while people are interested. How is that so offensive? It's what any celebrity does, they strike while it's hot.

It makes zero sense to me that people are essentially saying that they would rather they stayed in the BRF as figureheads and basically waited around to be made irrelevant than to do what they are doing. Then those same people say it's because they are HYPOCRITES, THEY WANT TO USE THEIR FAME. Ok...and? It's the publics' fault for being willing to pay for content from certain people over others. If you're going to fault H&M for that, you should similarly fault any "famous" person for the same. It makes no sense.

The British Royal Family is interesting. British princes are interesting. A British prince who wants to leave the royal family and live as a commoner, doing data entry or temping or whatever, is fine but not that interesting. A British prince who wants to leave the royal family but act like a British prince in California? Nope, that's insulting. Anglophiles don't want that, Brits don't want that, and Americans don't want that.

The world would embrace them if they actually worked. But they aren’t working. Their only commodity is themselves. Gross.

At least the Kardashians have legit business ventures. They are business people.

H+M are more akin to Aunt Becky’s social media influencer daughter.

The split happened a year ago. 2020 was not a banner year for doing in your face service and activism and starting businesses. Did you not notice the pandemic? Love them hate them whatever but had they been out and about all year that would have been terrible and extremely dumb.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So let me get this straight, many of you would prefer for Harry and his family, to sit around "working" for years as royals, until William and Kate ascend to the throne. Then, when William's kids are older, at which point Harry's family would have been pushed out of any position of relevancy. At that point, they would be reliant upon the goodwill of William and Kate for their mere existence. Their own personal wealth would be fairly small and they would have to look to the crown for handouts.

But somehow, that's better than using what he has, which is popularity and a title, to make his own way, forge his own path, and get some money of his own while people are interested. How is that so offensive? It's what any celebrity does, they strike while it's hot.

It makes zero sense to me that people are essentially saying that they would rather they stayed in the BRF as figureheads and basically waited around to be made irrelevant than to do what they are doing. Then those same people say it's because they are HYPOCRITES, THEY WANT TO USE THEIR FAME. Ok...and? It's the publics' fault for being willing to pay for content from certain people over others. If you're going to fault H&M for that, you should similarly fault any "famous" person for the same. It makes no sense.

The British Royal Family is interesting. British princes are interesting. A British prince who wants to leave the royal family and live as a commoner, doing data entry or temping or whatever, is fine but not that interesting. A British prince who wants to leave the royal family but act like a British prince in California? Nope, that's insulting. Anglophiles don't want that, Brits don't want that, and Americans don't want that.

The world would embrace them if they actually worked. But they aren’t working. Their only commodity is themselves. Gross.

At least the Kardashians have legit business ventures. They are business people.

H+M are more akin to Aunt Becky’s social media influencer daughter.

The split happened a year ago. 2020 was not a banner year for doing in your face service and activism and starting businesses. Did you not notice the pandemic? Love them hate them whatever but had they been out and about all year that would have been terrible and extremely dumb.

Doesn’t matter.

They don’t really want to work. They just want to get paid lots of money for periodically showing up at events for speeches and photo Ops.

These two won’t build a legit business.

They will likely revisit their plan to launch a faux charity. They’ll rebrand once the next baby arrives. It can’t be Archwell unless they name he next baby Wellington or some such.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So let me get this straight, many of you would prefer for Harry and his family, to sit around "working" for years as royals, until William and Kate ascend to the throne. Then, when William's kids are older, at which point Harry's family would have been pushed out of any position of relevancy. At that point, they would be reliant upon the goodwill of William and Kate for their mere existence. Their own personal wealth would be fairly small and they would have to look to the crown for handouts.

But somehow, that's better than using what he has, which is popularity and a title, to make his own way, forge his own path, and get some money of his own while people are interested. How is that so offensive? It's what any celebrity does, they strike while it's hot.

It makes zero sense to me that people are essentially saying that they would rather they stayed in the BRF as figureheads and basically waited around to be made irrelevant than to do what they are doing. Then those same people say it's because they are HYPOCRITES, THEY WANT TO USE THEIR FAME. Ok...and? It's the publics' fault for being willing to pay for content from certain people over others. If you're going to fault H&M for that, you should similarly fault any "famous" person for the same. It makes no sense.

The British Royal Family is interesting. British princes are interesting. A British prince who wants to leave the royal family and live as a commoner, doing data entry or temping or whatever, is fine but not that interesting. A British prince who wants to leave the royal family but act like a British prince in California? Nope, that's insulting. Anglophiles don't want that, Brits don't want that, and Americans don't want that.

The world would embrace them if they actually worked. But they aren’t working. Their only commodity is themselves. Gross.

At least the Kardashians have legit business ventures. They are business people.

H+M are more akin to Aunt Becky’s social media influencer daughter.

The split happened a year ago. 2020 was not a banner year for doing in your face service and activism and starting businesses. Did you not notice the pandemic? Love them hate them whatever but had they been out and about all year that would have been terrible and extremely dumb.

Doesn’t matter.

They don’t really want to work. They just want to get paid lots of money for periodically showing up at events for speeches and photo Ops.

These two won’t build a legit business.

They will likely revisit their plan to launch a faux charity. They’ll rebrand once the next baby arrives. It can’t be Archwell unless they name he next baby Wellington or some such.

H&M Haters: They are lazy grifters look they haven't done ANYTHING since they split

Reasonable person: Well it's been a weird year they couldn't do much this year

H&M Haters: THATS IRRELEVANT IT WOULD HAVE BEEN THE SAME EVEN IN A NORMAL YEAR

That's ridiculous because you don't know that. And that is basically what all the H&M haters do, make assumptions and cherry pick pieces of unconfirmed tabloid drama to confirm their own preconceived notions about the royals. I'm not saying H&M are perfect, but I know what I don't know, and I don't know enough real information about them to know one way or another, and neither do you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So let me get this straight, many of you would prefer for Harry and his family, to sit around "working" for years as royals, until William and Kate ascend to the throne. Then, when William's kids are older, at which point Harry's family would have been pushed out of any position of relevancy. At that point, they would be reliant upon the goodwill of William and Kate for their mere existence. Their own personal wealth would be fairly small and they would have to look to the crown for handouts.

But somehow, that's better than using what he has, which is popularity and a title, to make his own way, forge his own path, and get some money of his own while people are interested. How is that so offensive? It's what any celebrity does, they strike while it's hot.

It makes zero sense to me that people are essentially saying that they would rather they stayed in the BRF as figureheads and basically waited around to be made irrelevant than to do what they are doing. Then those same people say it's because they are HYPOCRITES, THEY WANT TO USE THEIR FAME. Ok...and? It's the publics' fault for being willing to pay for content from certain people over others. If you're going to fault H&M for that, you should similarly fault any "famous" person for the same. It makes no sense.

The British Royal Family is interesting. British princes are interesting. A British prince who wants to leave the royal family and live as a commoner, doing data entry or temping or whatever, is fine but not that interesting. A British prince who wants to leave the royal family but act like a British prince in California? Nope, that's insulting. Anglophiles don't want that, Brits don't want that, and Americans don't want that.

The world would embrace them if they actually worked. But they aren’t working. Their only commodity is themselves. Gross.

At least the Kardashians have legit business ventures. They are business people.

H+M are more akin to Aunt Becky’s social media influencer daughter.

The split happened a year ago. 2020 was not a banner year for doing in your face service and activism and starting businesses. Did you not notice the pandemic? Love them hate them whatever but had they been out and about all year that would have been terrible and extremely dumb.

Doesn’t matter.

They don’t really want to work. They just want to get paid lots of money for periodically showing up at events for speeches and photo Ops.

These two won’t build a legit business.

They will likely revisit their plan to launch a faux charity. They’ll rebrand once the next baby arrives. It can’t be Archwell unless they name he next baby Wellington or some such.

H&M Haters: They are lazy grifters look they haven't done ANYTHING since they split

Reasonable person: Well it's been a weird year they couldn't do much this year

H&M Haters: THATS IRRELEVANT IT WOULD HAVE BEEN THE SAME EVEN IN A NORMAL YEAR

That's ridiculous because you don't know that. And that is basically what all the H&M haters do, make assumptions and cherry pick pieces of unconfirmed tabloid drama to confirm their own preconceived notions about the royals. I'm not saying H&M are perfect, but I know what I don't know, and I don't know enough real information about them to know one way or another, and neither do you.

We know what they themselves are putting out there. There’s plenty from which to draw conclusions.

Heck, just read the statement they put out in response to the Queen taking back their patronages.

The fact they are going on Oprah speaks volumes about who they are and what they are trying to do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So let me get this straight, many of you would prefer for Harry and his family, to sit around "working" for years as royals, until William and Kate ascend to the throne. Then, when William's kids are older, at which point Harry's family would have been pushed out of any position of relevancy. At that point, they would be reliant upon the goodwill of William and Kate for their mere existence. Their own personal wealth would be fairly small and they would have to look to the crown for handouts.

But somehow, that's better than using what he has, which is popularity and a title, to make his own way, forge his own path, and get some money of his own while people are interested. How is that so offensive? It's what any celebrity does, they strike while it's hot.

It makes zero sense to me that people are essentially saying that they would rather they stayed in the BRF as figureheads and basically waited around to be made irrelevant than to do what they are doing. Then those same people say it's because they are HYPOCRITES, THEY WANT TO USE THEIR FAME. Ok...and? It's the publics' fault for being willing to pay for content from certain people over others. If you're going to fault H&M for that, you should similarly fault any "famous" person for the same. It makes no sense.

The British Royal Family is interesting. British princes are interesting. A British prince who wants to leave the royal family and live as a commoner, doing data entry or temping or whatever, is fine but not that interesting. A British prince who wants to leave the royal family but act like a British prince in California? Nope, that's insulting. Anglophiles don't want that, Brits don't want that, and Americans don't want that.

The world would embrace them if they actually worked. But they aren’t working. Their only commodity is themselves. Gross.

At least the Kardashians have legit business ventures. They are business people.

H+M are more akin to Aunt Becky’s social media influencer daughter.

The split happened a year ago. 2020 was not a banner year for doing in your face service and activism and starting businesses. Did you not notice the pandemic? Love them hate them whatever but had they been out and about all year that would have been terrible and extremely dumb.

Doesn’t matter.

They don’t really want to work. They just want to get paid lots of money for periodically showing up at events for speeches and photo Ops.

These two won’t build a legit business.

They will likely revisit their plan to launch a faux charity. They’ll rebrand once the next baby arrives. It can’t be Archwell unless they name he next baby Wellington or some such.

H&M Haters: They are lazy grifters look they haven't done ANYTHING since they split

Reasonable person: Well it's been a weird year they couldn't do much this year

H&M Haters: THATS IRRELEVANT IT WOULD HAVE BEEN THE SAME EVEN IN A NORMAL YEAR

That's ridiculous because you don't know that. And that is basically what all the H&M haters do, make assumptions and cherry pick pieces of unconfirmed tabloid drama to confirm their own preconceived notions about the royals. I'm not saying H&M are perfect, but I know what I don't know, and I don't know enough real information about them to know one way or another, and neither do you.

We know what they themselves are putting out there. There’s plenty from which to draw conclusions.

Heck, just read the statement they put out in response to the Queen taking back their patronages.

The fact they are going on Oprah speaks volumes about who they are and what they are trying to do.

What's wrong with Oprah?

[Anonymous]

I wish i can just leave my family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So let me get this straight, many of you would prefer for Harry and his family, to sit around "working" for years as royals, until William and Kate ascend to the throne. Then, when William's kids are older, at which point Harry's family would have been pushed out of any position of relevancy. At that point, they would be reliant upon the goodwill of William and Kate for their mere existence. Their own personal wealth would be fairly small and they would have to look to the crown for handouts.

But somehow, that's better than using what he has, which is popularity and a title, to make his own way, forge his own path, and get some money of his own while people are interested. How is that so offensive? It's what any celebrity does, they strike while it's hot.

It makes zero sense to me that people are essentially saying that they would rather they stayed in the BRF as figureheads and basically waited around to be made irrelevant than to do what they are doing. Then those same people say it's because they are HYPOCRITES, THEY WANT TO USE THEIR FAME. Ok...and? It's the publics' fault for being willing to pay for content from certain people over others. If you're going to fault H&M for that, you should similarly fault any "famous" person for the same. It makes no sense.

The British Royal Family is interesting. British princes are interesting. A British prince who wants to leave the royal family and live as a commoner, doing data entry or temping or whatever, is fine but not that interesting. A British prince who wants to leave the royal family but act like a British prince in California? Nope, that's insulting. Anglophiles don't want that, Brits don't want that, and Americans don't want that.

The world would embrace them if they actually worked. But they aren’t working. Their only commodity is themselves. Gross.

At least the Kardashians have legit business ventures. They are business people.

H+M are more akin to Aunt Becky’s social media influencer daughter.

The split happened a year ago. 2020 was not a banner year for doing in your face service and activism and starting businesses. Did you not notice the pandemic? Love them hate them whatever but had they been out and about all year that would have been terrible and extremely dumb.

Doesn’t matter.

They don’t really want to work. They just want to get paid lots of money for periodically showing up at events for speeches and photo Ops.

These two won’t build a legit business.

They will likely revisit their plan to launch a faux charity. They’ll rebrand once the next baby arrives. It can’t be Archwell unless they name he next baby Wellington or some such.

How do you define work? You thought they would do a 9-5?

Also, what is a legit business? A production company and a charity are not legit businesses? Their foundation and production company will scale up and have salaried staff at some point will they be legit businesses then?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So let me get this straight, many of you would prefer for Harry and his family, to sit around "working" for years as royals, until William and Kate ascend to the throne. Then, when William's kids are older, at which point Harry's family would have been pushed out of any position of relevancy. At that point, they would be reliant upon the goodwill of William and Kate for their mere existence. Their own personal wealth would be fairly small and they would have to look to the crown for handouts.

But somehow, that's better than using what he has, which is popularity and a title, to make his own way, forge his own path, and get some money of his own while people are interested. How is that so offensive? It's what any celebrity does, they strike while it's hot.

It makes zero sense to me that people are essentially saying that they would rather they stayed in the BRF as figureheads and basically waited around to be made irrelevant than to do what they are doing. Then those same people say it's because they are HYPOCRITES, THEY WANT TO USE THEIR FAME. Ok...and? It's the publics' fault for being willing to pay for content from certain people over others. If you're going to fault H&M for that, you should similarly fault any "famous" person for the same. It makes no sense.

The British Royal Family is interesting. British princes are interesting. A British prince who wants to leave the royal family and live as a commoner, doing data entry or temping or whatever, is fine but not that interesting. A British prince who wants to leave the royal family but act like a British prince in California? Nope, that's insulting. Anglophiles don't want that, Brits don't want that, and Americans don't want that.

The world would embrace them if they actually worked. But they aren’t working. Their only commodity is themselves. Gross.

At least the Kardashians have legit business ventures. They are business people.

H+M are more akin to Aunt Becky’s social media influencer daughter.

The split happened a year ago. 2020 was not a banner year for doing in your face service and activism and starting businesses. Did you not notice the pandemic? Love them hate them whatever but had they been out and about all year that would have been terrible and extremely dumb.

Doesn’t matter.

They don’t really want to work. They just want to get paid lots of money for periodically showing up at events for speeches and photo Ops.

These two won’t build a legit business.

They will likely revisit their plan to launch a faux charity. They’ll rebrand once the next baby arrives. It can’t be Archwell unless they name he next baby Wellington or some such.

H&M Haters: They are lazy grifters look they haven't done ANYTHING since they split

Reasonable person: Well it's been a weird year they couldn't do much this year

H&M Haters: THATS IRRELEVANT IT WOULD HAVE BEEN THE SAME EVEN IN A NORMAL YEAR

That's ridiculous because you don't know that. And that is basically what all the H&M haters do, make assumptions and cherry pick pieces of unconfirmed tabloid drama to confirm their own preconceived notions about the royals. I'm not saying H&M are perfect, but I know what I don't know, and I don't know enough real information about them to know one way or another, and neither do you.

We know what they themselves are putting out there. There’s plenty from which to draw conclusions.

Heck, just read the statement they put out in response to the Queen taking back their patronages.

The fact they are going on Oprah speaks volumes about who they are and what they are trying to do.

I read both of those statements and know about the Oprah thing. My 'gut' drives me to an entirely different conclusion than you. My impression is that the royal family has tried to make them look like ungrateful quitters who hate them and they have been heavily leveraging their PR arms to drive this home, and that H&M just aren't taking it lying down and are refusing to accept the palace lying about them. My impression is that Harry loves his family but was very resentful about how they treated MM and his baggage and resentment about what happened to his mom caused a fracture decades in the making.

And that Harry feels pretty strongly about not making MM the scapegoat here, probably again to deal with the stuff with his mom, so he's willing to put more out into the public sphere than the BRF is comfortable with.

Who knows if I am right, the word impression up there is doing a lot of heavy lifting. But the reality is that both of us just have an impression, based on assumptions we are making about the public face put on by both parties. And both of us would be silly and arrogant to act like our impression is anything more than just that.

[Anonymous]

NP here. I am listening to the podcast just released by the BBC. It really does seem that Harry is being petulant. His Press Release after what the Queen released is pretty rude.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p097jxww

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So let me get this straight, many of you would prefer for Harry and his family, to sit around "working" for years as royals, until William and Kate ascend to the throne. Then, when William's kids are older, at which point Harry's family would have been pushed out of any position of relevancy. At that point, they would be reliant upon the goodwill of William and Kate for their mere existence. Their own personal wealth would be fairly small and they would have to look to the crown for handouts.

But somehow, that's better than using what he has, which is popularity and a title, to make his own way, forge his own path, and get some money of his own while people are interested. How is that so offensive? It's what any celebrity does, they strike while it's hot.

It makes zero sense to me that people are essentially saying that they would rather they stayed in the BRF as figureheads and basically waited around to be made irrelevant than to do what they are doing. Then those same people say it's because they are HYPOCRITES, THEY WANT TO USE THEIR FAME. Ok...and? It's the publics' fault for being willing to pay for content from certain people over others. If you're going to fault H&M for that, you should similarly fault any "famous" person for the same. It makes no sense.

The British Royal Family is interesting. British princes are interesting. A British prince who wants to leave the royal family and live as a commoner, doing data entry or temping or whatever, is fine but not that interesting. A British prince who wants to leave the royal family but act like a British prince in California? Nope, that's insulting. Anglophiles don't want that, Brits don't want that, and Americans don't want that.

The world would embrace them if they actually worked. But they aren’t working. Their only commodity is themselves. Gross.

At least the Kardashians have legit business ventures. They are business people.

H+M are more akin to Aunt Becky’s social media influencer daughter.

The split happened a year ago. 2020 was not a banner year for doing in your face service and activism and starting businesses. Did you not notice the pandemic? Love them hate them whatever but had they been out and about all year that would have been terrible and extremely dumb.

Doesn’t matter.

They don’t really want to work. They just want to get paid lots of money for periodically showing up at events for speeches and photo Ops.

These two won’t build a legit business.

They will likely revisit their plan to launch a faux charity. They’ll rebrand once the next baby arrives. It can’t be Archwell unless they name he next baby Wellington or some such.

How do you define work? You thought they would do a 9-5?

Also, what is a legit business? A production company and a charity are not legit businesses? Their foundation and production company will scale up and have salaried staff at some point will they be legit businesses then?

Yes, then. Until that happens though, they aren't legitimately working and they don't have any work or legit business. It hasn't happened yet.

Yes, the pandemic was inconvenient for them, as well as for most people in the world. So maybe they will start working in 2021. Or 2022...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Duke and Queen will pass, Charles will ascend to the throne, William will be the Prince of Wales, and Duke Harry will be a glorified SAHP while Ducbess Meghan builds her American brand while using her kids for Instagram pics and sell products during talk show interviews.

But, will that be enough for Harry?

When will he get restless?

When will he realize he’s playing second fiddle?

How will he feel seeing Will’s kids receiving top notch educations and being photographed doing great things while his kids are surrounded by uncouth American rich kids in a wretched place like La-La-land?

Will he miss Christmas at Sandringham?

And, let’s face it: he’s not aging well. Will Meghan remain faithful? Or, will she trade up at some point?

He's been second fiddle his entire life. Why do you think his kid's won't receive top notch educations? You think Americans cannot educate people? LOL.

He may miss Christmas with his family and it may cause a lot of pain for him to not be welcomed by them as the wounds of this split may not ever fully heal, but the rest of your points are hilariously weird.

this, he's known from the time he was a child that his brother will be king and that his brother's eldest will be king/queen and that he won't be and his kids won't be. I have to think that has some effect on how your character develops