GA Case

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Mr. Shafer would offer the testimony of attorney Cindi Lee Yeager, a Co- Chief Deputy District Attorney for the Cobb County, Georgia, District Attorney’s Office.
On Friday, March 1, 2024, Ms. Yeager spoke via telephone with undersigned counsel for Mr. Shafer and Mr. Christopher Anulewicz, counsel for Defendant Robert Cheeley. Following is a summary of the proposed testimony which was provided by Ms. Yeager to counsel for Mr. Shafer and Mr. Cheeley:
• From in or around August of 2023 through January of 2024, Ms. Yeager had numerous, in-person and other conversations with attorney Terence Bradley in which information relating to District Attorney Willis and Mr. Wade was discussed.
• In the course of Mr. Bradley’s and Ms. Yeager’s discussions, Mr. Bradley told Ms. Yeager the following:
District Attorney Willis and Mr. Wade met during the 2019 Municipal Court Continuing Legal Education Conference.
o Mr. Wade began his romantic relationship with District Attorney Willis at or around this time.
o Mr. Wade had definitively begun a romantic relationship with Ms. Willis during the time that Ms. Willis was running for District Attorney in 2019 through 2020.
o Mr. Bradley stated that he had personal knowledge of the relationship between Mr. Wade and District Attorney Willis, and included details regarding the use of Ms. Robin Yeartie’s apartment and other meetings prior to November 2021.
o Mr. Bradley stated that Mr. Wade personally prepared his own divorce complaint against his spouse, Mrs. Jocelyn Wade, and told Mr. Bradley to sign the divorce filings and to file them on Mr. Wade’s behalf. Based upon these statements, it is Ms. Yeager’s understanding that Mr. Bradley did not being representing Mr. Wade until November of 2021.
o In or around September of 2023, Mr. Bradley was visiting Ms. Yeager in her office when Mr. Bradly received a telephone call. Ms. Yeager could hear that the caller was District Attorney Willis. District Attorney Willis was calling Mr. Bradley in response to an article that was published about how much money Mr. Wade and his law partners had been paid in this case. Ms. Yeager heard District Attorney Willis tell Mr. Bradley: “They are coming after us. You don’t need to talk to them about anything about us.”
2
• Ms. Yeager watched Mr. Bradley’s testimony before the Court and became concerned as a result of the fact that what Mr. Bradley testified to on the witness stand was directly contrary to what Mr. Bradley had told Ms. Yeager in person.


Why would someone file this after closing?


Evidently, the witness came forward after the hearing. March 1.
And, to the person asking if this is hearsay..... no, it is not. This Deputy DA for Cobb County is willing to testify.
I doubt the judge will reopen the hearing, but it is more evidence that Fani and Nathan lied about their relationship.



Or that someone from Cobb County is willing to spin a yarn for MAGAism.


I find it hard to believe that a deputy DA would put her reputation and career on the line to lie at this point in this case.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Mr. Shafer would offer the testimony of attorney Cindi Lee Yeager, a Co- Chief Deputy District Attorney for the Cobb County, Georgia, District Attorney’s Office.
On Friday, March 1, 2024, Ms. Yeager spoke via telephone with undersigned counsel for Mr. Shafer and Mr. Christopher Anulewicz, counsel for Defendant Robert Cheeley. Following is a summary of the proposed testimony which was provided by Ms. Yeager to counsel for Mr. Shafer and Mr. Cheeley:
• From in or around August of 2023 through January of 2024, Ms. Yeager had numerous, in-person and other conversations with attorney Terence Bradley in which information relating to District Attorney Willis and Mr. Wade was discussed.
• In the course of Mr. Bradley’s and Ms. Yeager’s discussions, Mr. Bradley told Ms. Yeager the following:
District Attorney Willis and Mr. Wade met during the 2019 Municipal Court Continuing Legal Education Conference.
o Mr. Wade began his romantic relationship with District Attorney Willis at or around this time.
o Mr. Wade had definitively begun a romantic relationship with Ms. Willis during the time that Ms. Willis was running for District Attorney in 2019 through 2020.
o Mr. Bradley stated that he had personal knowledge of the relationship between Mr. Wade and District Attorney Willis, and included details regarding the use of Ms. Robin Yeartie’s apartment and other meetings prior to November 2021.
o Mr. Bradley stated that Mr. Wade personally prepared his own divorce complaint against his spouse, Mrs. Jocelyn Wade, and told Mr. Bradley to sign the divorce filings and to file them on Mr. Wade’s behalf. Based upon these statements, it is Ms. Yeager’s understanding that Mr. Bradley did not being representing Mr. Wade until November of 2021.
o In or around September of 2023, Mr. Bradley was visiting Ms. Yeager in her office when Mr. Bradly received a telephone call. Ms. Yeager could hear that the caller was District Attorney Willis. District Attorney Willis was calling Mr. Bradley in response to an article that was published about how much money Mr. Wade and his law partners had been paid in this case. Ms. Yeager heard District Attorney Willis tell Mr. Bradley: “They are coming after us. You don’t need to talk to them about anything about us.”
2
• Ms. Yeager watched Mr. Bradley’s testimony before the Court and became concerned as a result of the fact that what Mr. Bradley testified to on the witness stand was directly contrary to what Mr. Bradley had told Ms. Yeager in person.


Why would someone file this after closing?


Evidently, the witness came forward after the hearing. March 1.
And, to the person asking if this is hearsay..... no, it is not. This Deputy DA for Cobb County is willing to testify.
I doubt the judge will reopen the hearing, but it is more evidence that Fani and Nathan lied about their relationship.



Or that someone from Cobb County is willing to spin a yarn for MAGAism.


I find it hard to believe that a deputy DA would put her reputation and career on the line to lie at this point in this case.


Why not? We have seen the same time and time again from the GOP, many of whome have been caught up in provable perjury charges to cover for this kind of BS.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Mr. Shafer would offer the testimony of attorney Cindi Lee Yeager, a Co- Chief Deputy District Attorney for the Cobb County, Georgia, District Attorney’s Office.
On Friday, March 1, 2024, Ms. Yeager spoke via telephone with undersigned counsel for Mr. Shafer and Mr. Christopher Anulewicz, counsel for Defendant Robert Cheeley. Following is a summary of the proposed testimony which was provided by Ms. Yeager to counsel for Mr. Shafer and Mr. Cheeley:
• From in or around August of 2023 through January of 2024, Ms. Yeager had numerous, in-person and other conversations with attorney Terence Bradley in which information relating to District Attorney Willis and Mr. Wade was discussed.
• In the course of Mr. Bradley’s and Ms. Yeager’s discussions, Mr. Bradley told Ms. Yeager the following:
District Attorney Willis and Mr. Wade met during the 2019 Municipal Court Continuing Legal Education Conference.
o Mr. Wade began his romantic relationship with District Attorney Willis at or around this time.
o Mr. Wade had definitively begun a romantic relationship with Ms. Willis during the time that Ms. Willis was running for District Attorney in 2019 through 2020.
o Mr. Bradley stated that he had personal knowledge of the relationship between Mr. Wade and District Attorney Willis, and included details regarding the use of Ms. Robin Yeartie’s apartment and other meetings prior to November 2021.
o Mr. Bradley stated that Mr. Wade personally prepared his own divorce complaint against his spouse, Mrs. Jocelyn Wade, and told Mr. Bradley to sign the divorce filings and to file them on Mr. Wade’s behalf. Based upon these statements, it is Ms. Yeager’s understanding that Mr. Bradley did not being representing Mr. Wade until November of 2021.
o In or around September of 2023, Mr. Bradley was visiting Ms. Yeager in her office when Mr. Bradly received a telephone call. Ms. Yeager could hear that the caller was District Attorney Willis. District Attorney Willis was calling Mr. Bradley in response to an article that was published about how much money Mr. Wade and his law partners had been paid in this case. Ms. Yeager heard District Attorney Willis tell Mr. Bradley: “They are coming after us. You don’t need to talk to them about anything about us.”
2
• Ms. Yeager watched Mr. Bradley’s testimony before the Court and became concerned as a result of the fact that what Mr. Bradley testified to on the witness stand was directly contrary to what Mr. Bradley had told Ms. Yeager in person.


Why would someone file this after closing?


Evidently, the witness came forward after the hearing. March 1.
And, to the person asking if this is hearsay..... no, it is not. This Deputy DA for Cobb County is willing to testify.
I doubt the judge will reopen the hearing, but it is more evidence that Fani and Nathan lied about their relationship.



Or that someone from Cobb County is willing to spin a yarn for MAGAism.


I find it hard to believe that a deputy DA would put her reputation and career on the line to lie at this point in this case.


Why not? We have seen the same time and time again from the GOP, many of whome have been caught up in provable perjury charges to cover for this kind of BS.


Nah. Only DA's like Fani do that to cover her a$$ in order to get Trump.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Mr. Shafer would offer the testimony of attorney Cindi Lee Yeager, a Co- Chief Deputy District Attorney for the Cobb County, Georgia, District Attorney’s Office.
On Friday, March 1, 2024, Ms. Yeager spoke via telephone with undersigned counsel for Mr. Shafer and Mr. Christopher Anulewicz, counsel for Defendant Robert Cheeley. Following is a summary of the proposed testimony which was provided by Ms. Yeager to counsel for Mr. Shafer and Mr. Cheeley:
• From in or around August of 2023 through January of 2024, Ms. Yeager had numerous, in-person and other conversations with attorney Terence Bradley in which information relating to District Attorney Willis and Mr. Wade was discussed.
• In the course of Mr. Bradley’s and Ms. Yeager’s discussions, Mr. Bradley told Ms. Yeager the following:
District Attorney Willis and Mr. Wade met during the 2019 Municipal Court Continuing Legal Education Conference.
o Mr. Wade began his romantic relationship with District Attorney Willis at or around this time.
o Mr. Wade had definitively begun a romantic relationship with Ms. Willis during the time that Ms. Willis was running for District Attorney in 2019 through 2020.
o Mr. Bradley stated that he had personal knowledge of the relationship between Mr. Wade and District Attorney Willis, and included details regarding the use of Ms. Robin Yeartie’s apartment and other meetings prior to November 2021.
o Mr. Bradley stated that Mr. Wade personally prepared his own divorce complaint against his spouse, Mrs. Jocelyn Wade, and told Mr. Bradley to sign the divorce filings and to file them on Mr. Wade’s behalf. Based upon these statements, it is Ms. Yeager’s understanding that Mr. Bradley did not being representing Mr. Wade until November of 2021.
o In or around September of 2023, Mr. Bradley was visiting Ms. Yeager in her office when Mr. Bradly received a telephone call. Ms. Yeager could hear that the caller was District Attorney Willis. District Attorney Willis was calling Mr. Bradley in response to an article that was published about how much money Mr. Wade and his law partners had been paid in this case. Ms. Yeager heard District Attorney Willis tell Mr. Bradley: “They are coming after us. You don’t need to talk to them about anything about us.”
2
• Ms. Yeager watched Mr. Bradley’s testimony before the Court and became concerned as a result of the fact that what Mr. Bradley testified to on the witness stand was directly contrary to what Mr. Bradley had told Ms. Yeager in person.


Why would someone file this after closing?


Evidently, the witness came forward after the hearing. March 1.
And, to the person asking if this is hearsay..... no, it is not. This Deputy DA for Cobb County is willing to testify.
I doubt the judge will reopen the hearing, but it is more evidence that Fani and Nathan lied about their relationship.


Yes it is hearsay. Everything he says he’ll testify to is things that Yeager told him, not anything he himself witnessed.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Isn't adultery illegal in Georgia


The jails, federal and State prisons would overflow if you're going to start prosecuting for adultery! Also, Donald Trump is an admitted adulterer!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Mr. Shafer would offer the testimony of attorney Cindi Lee Yeager, a Co- Chief Deputy District Attorney for the Cobb County, Georgia, District Attorney’s Office.
On Friday, March 1, 2024, Ms. Yeager spoke via telephone with undersigned counsel for Mr. Shafer and Mr. Christopher Anulewicz, counsel for Defendant Robert Cheeley. Following is a summary of the proposed testimony which was provided by Ms. Yeager to counsel for Mr. Shafer and Mr. Cheeley:
• From in or around August of 2023 through January of 2024, Ms. Yeager had numerous, in-person and other conversations with attorney Terence Bradley in which information relating to District Attorney Willis and Mr. Wade was discussed.
• In the course of Mr. Bradley’s and Ms. Yeager’s discussions, Mr. Bradley told Ms. Yeager the following:
District Attorney Willis and Mr. Wade met during the 2019 Municipal Court Continuing Legal Education Conference.
o Mr. Wade began his romantic relationship with District Attorney Willis at or around this time.
o Mr. Wade had definitively begun a romantic relationship with Ms. Willis during the time that Ms. Willis was running for District Attorney in 2019 through 2020.
o Mr. Bradley stated that he had personal knowledge of the relationship between Mr. Wade and District Attorney Willis, and included details regarding the use of Ms. Robin Yeartie’s apartment and other meetings prior to November 2021.
o Mr. Bradley stated that Mr. Wade personally prepared his own divorce complaint against his spouse, Mrs. Jocelyn Wade, and told Mr. Bradley to sign the divorce filings and to file them on Mr. Wade’s behalf. Based upon these statements, it is Ms. Yeager’s understanding that Mr. Bradley did not being representing Mr. Wade until November of 2021.
o In or around September of 2023, Mr. Bradley was visiting Ms. Yeager in her office when Mr. Bradly received a telephone call. Ms. Yeager could hear that the caller was District Attorney Willis. District Attorney Willis was calling Mr. Bradley in response to an article that was published about how much money Mr. Wade and his law partners had been paid in this case. Ms. Yeager heard District Attorney Willis tell Mr. Bradley: “They are coming after us. You don’t need to talk to them about anything about us.”
2
• Ms. Yeager watched Mr. Bradley’s testimony before the Court and became concerned as a result of the fact that what Mr. Bradley testified to on the witness stand was directly contrary to what Mr. Bradley had told Ms. Yeager in person.


Why would someone file this after closing?


Evidently, the witness came forward after the hearing. March 1.
And, to the person asking if this is hearsay..... no, it is not. This Deputy DA for Cobb County is willing to testify.
I doubt the judge will reopen the hearing, but it is more evidence that Fani and Nathan lied about their relationship.



Or that someone from Cobb County is willing to spin a yarn for MAGAism.


I find it hard to believe that a deputy DA would put her reputation and career on the line to lie at this point in this case.


DP. Why would you believe that a deputy DA is any less likely to put her reputation and career on the line than the career lawyers who have been disbarred for their work for Trump? Or the lawyers and public officials who risked their careers and jail time to be false electors in multiple states? Or the people who were willing to risk jail time to go and support Trump in Washington DC, then march down to the US Capitol and enter illegally and damage a federal building and try to prevent the US Congress from fulfilling their constitutional duties?

There are many thousands of people of all walks of life and many more significant and lucrative career choices that made choices that were not morally or legally correct in the past to support Trump over the last four years. In a deeply red state, why would you not believe that there is a state employee who would not take risks to help prevent the court case against Trump from proceeding in the hopes that possibly she could get recognition or even some opportunity in the future based on how supportive she's been to the Trump cause.

If Willis and Wade are thrown off of the case, it will only be the nail in the coffin that will ensure that the GA case will go nowhere before the November elections. There are still many out there who think that if none of the criminal cases go against Trump, he will win the November election, be immune from the cases continuing and be able to dismiss some of the cases during his four years in office and pardon any who have already been convicted or serving jail time for previous support of him and his cause.

This deputy DA could easily be making the same mistake that hundreds and thousands have before her over the last four years.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Mr. Shafer would offer the testimony of attorney Cindi Lee Yeager, a Co- Chief Deputy District Attorney for the Cobb County, Georgia, District Attorney’s Office.
On Friday, March 1, 2024, Ms. Yeager spoke via telephone with undersigned counsel for Mr. Shafer and Mr. Christopher Anulewicz, counsel for Defendant Robert Cheeley. Following is a summary of the proposed testimony which was provided by Ms. Yeager to counsel for Mr. Shafer and Mr. Cheeley:
• From in or around August of 2023 through January of 2024, Ms. Yeager had numerous, in-person and other conversations with attorney Terence Bradley in which information relating to District Attorney Willis and Mr. Wade was discussed.
• In the course of Mr. Bradley’s and Ms. Yeager’s discussions, Mr. Bradley told Ms. Yeager the following:
District Attorney Willis and Mr. Wade met during the 2019 Municipal Court Continuing Legal Education Conference.
o Mr. Wade began his romantic relationship with District Attorney Willis at or around this time.
o Mr. Wade had definitively begun a romantic relationship with Ms. Willis during the time that Ms. Willis was running for District Attorney in 2019 through 2020.
o Mr. Bradley stated that he had personal knowledge of the relationship between Mr. Wade and District Attorney Willis, and included details regarding the use of Ms. Robin Yeartie’s apartment and other meetings prior to November 2021.
o Mr. Bradley stated that Mr. Wade personally prepared his own divorce complaint against his spouse, Mrs. Jocelyn Wade, and told Mr. Bradley to sign the divorce filings and to file them on Mr. Wade’s behalf. Based upon these statements, it is Ms. Yeager’s understanding that Mr. Bradley did not being representing Mr. Wade until November of 2021.
o In or around September of 2023, Mr. Bradley was visiting Ms. Yeager in her office when Mr. Bradly received a telephone call. Ms. Yeager could hear that the caller was District Attorney Willis. District Attorney Willis was calling Mr. Bradley in response to an article that was published about how much money Mr. Wade and his law partners had been paid in this case. Ms. Yeager heard District Attorney Willis tell Mr. Bradley: “They are coming after us. You don’t need to talk to them about anything about us.”
2
• Ms. Yeager watched Mr. Bradley’s testimony before the Court and became concerned as a result of the fact that what Mr. Bradley testified to on the witness stand was directly contrary to what Mr. Bradley had told Ms. Yeager in person.


Why would someone file this after closing?


Evidently, the witness came forward after the hearing. March 1.
And, to the person asking if this is hearsay..... no, it is not. This Deputy DA for Cobb County is willing to testify.
I doubt the judge will reopen the hearing, but it is more evidence that Fani and Nathan lied about their relationship.


Yes it is hearsay. Everything he says he’ll testify to is things that Yeager told him, not anything he himself witnessed.


He would not be testifying. Yeager would. I point you to the final paragraph in the filing....

"Therefore, in the event that the Court re-opens the hearing to receive additional
evidence, as requested by the State and Defendant former President Trump, Mr. Shafer
requests that the defense be permitted to subpoena Ms. Yeager and present Ms. Yeager’s
testimony relating to the matters set forth herein."

Not hearsay.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Another person comes forward.........


Anonymous
If it was about the case Willis and Wade would step aside, but no this about them and their ambition.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Mr. Shafer would offer the testimony of attorney Cindi Lee Yeager, a Co- Chief Deputy District Attorney for the Cobb County, Georgia, District Attorney’s Office.
On Friday, March 1, 2024, Ms. Yeager spoke via telephone with undersigned counsel for Mr. Shafer and Mr. Christopher Anulewicz, counsel for Defendant Robert Cheeley. Following is a summary of the proposed testimony which was provided by Ms. Yeager to counsel for Mr. Shafer and Mr. Cheeley:
• From in or around August of 2023 through January of 2024, Ms. Yeager had numerous, in-person and other conversations with attorney Terence Bradley in which information relating to District Attorney Willis and Mr. Wade was discussed.
• In the course of Mr. Bradley’s and Ms. Yeager’s discussions, Mr. Bradley told Ms. Yeager the following:
District Attorney Willis and Mr. Wade met during the 2019 Municipal Court Continuing Legal Education Conference.
o Mr. Wade began his romantic relationship with District Attorney Willis at or around this time.
o Mr. Wade had definitively begun a romantic relationship with Ms. Willis during the time that Ms. Willis was running for District Attorney in 2019 through 2020.
o Mr. Bradley stated that he had personal knowledge of the relationship between Mr. Wade and District Attorney Willis, and included details regarding the use of Ms. Robin Yeartie’s apartment and other meetings prior to November 2021.
o Mr. Bradley stated that Mr. Wade personally prepared his own divorce complaint against his spouse, Mrs. Jocelyn Wade, and told Mr. Bradley to sign the divorce filings and to file them on Mr. Wade’s behalf. Based upon these statements, it is Ms. Yeager’s understanding that Mr. Bradley did not being representing Mr. Wade until November of 2021.
o In or around September of 2023, Mr. Bradley was visiting Ms. Yeager in her office when Mr. Bradly received a telephone call. Ms. Yeager could hear that the caller was District Attorney Willis. District Attorney Willis was calling Mr. Bradley in response to an article that was published about how much money Mr. Wade and his law partners had been paid in this case. Ms. Yeager heard District Attorney Willis tell Mr. Bradley: “They are coming after us. You don’t need to talk to them about anything about us.”
2
• Ms. Yeager watched Mr. Bradley’s testimony before the Court and became concerned as a result of the fact that what Mr. Bradley testified to on the witness stand was directly contrary to what Mr. Bradley had told Ms. Yeager in person.


Why would someone file this after closing?


Evidently, the witness came forward after the hearing. March 1.
And, to the person asking if this is hearsay..... no, it is not. This Deputy DA for Cobb County is willing to testify.
I doubt the judge will reopen the hearing, but it is more evidence that Fani and Nathan lied about their relationship.



Or that someone from Cobb County is willing to spin a yarn for MAGAism.


I find it hard to believe that a deputy DA would put her reputation and career on the line to lie at this point in this case.


DP. Why would you believe that a deputy DA is any less likely to put her reputation and career on the line than the career lawyers who have been disbarred for their work for Trump? Or the lawyers and public officials who risked their careers and jail time to be false electors in multiple states? Or the people who were willing to risk jail time to go and support Trump in Washington DC, then march down to the US Capitol and enter illegally and damage a federal building and try to prevent the US Congress from fulfilling their constitutional duties?

There are many thousands of people of all walks of life and many more significant and lucrative career choices that made choices that were not morally or legally correct in the past to support Trump over the last four years. In a deeply red state, why would you not believe that there is a state employee who would not take risks to help prevent the court case against Trump from proceeding in the hopes that possibly she could get recognition or even some opportunity in the future based on how supportive she's been to the Trump cause.

If Willis and Wade are thrown off of the case, it will only be the nail in the coffin that will ensure that the GA case will go nowhere before the November elections. There are still many out there who think that if none of the criminal cases go against Trump, he will win the November election, be immune from the cases continuing and be able to dismiss some of the cases during his four years in office and pardon any who have already been convicted or serving jail time for previous support of him and his cause.

This deputy DA could easily be making the same mistake that hundreds and thousands have before her over the last four years.


Not Deputy DA but Chief Deputy DA of Cobb County. Big difference and this Chief Deputy DA is putting her reputation and her license/livelihood on the line when most people (especially other prosecutors) would not want to get involved at this late stage.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:If it was about the case Willis and Wade would step aside, but no this about them and their ambition.

It’s been explained multiple times on this thread, that no one else will get this case if Willis is Disqualified
So either
A) you are lazy and not reading the thread
Or
B) understand that this case will die if these people are disqualified, and you are very happy to see justice denied in favor of your chosen political team.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Mr. Shafer would offer the testimony of attorney Cindi Lee Yeager, a Co- Chief Deputy District Attorney for the Cobb County, Georgia, District Attorney’s Office.
On Friday, March 1, 2024, Ms. Yeager spoke via telephone with undersigned counsel for Mr. Shafer and Mr. Christopher Anulewicz, counsel for Defendant Robert Cheeley. Following is a summary of the proposed testimony which was provided by Ms. Yeager to counsel for Mr. Shafer and Mr. Cheeley:
• From in or around August of 2023 through January of 2024, Ms. Yeager had numerous, in-person and other conversations with attorney Terence Bradley in which information relating to District Attorney Willis and Mr. Wade was discussed.
• In the course of Mr. Bradley’s and Ms. Yeager’s discussions, Mr. Bradley told Ms. Yeager the following:
District Attorney Willis and Mr. Wade met during the 2019 Municipal Court Continuing Legal Education Conference.
o Mr. Wade began his romantic relationship with District Attorney Willis at or around this time.
o Mr. Wade had definitively begun a romantic relationship with Ms. Willis during the time that Ms. Willis was running for District Attorney in 2019 through 2020.
o Mr. Bradley stated that he had personal knowledge of the relationship between Mr. Wade and District Attorney Willis, and included details regarding the use of Ms. Robin Yeartie’s apartment and other meetings prior to November 2021.
o Mr. Bradley stated that Mr. Wade personally prepared his own divorce complaint against his spouse, Mrs. Jocelyn Wade, and told Mr. Bradley to sign the divorce filings and to file them on Mr. Wade’s behalf. Based upon these statements, it is Ms. Yeager’s understanding that Mr. Bradley did not being representing Mr. Wade until November of 2021.
o In or around September of 2023, Mr. Bradley was visiting Ms. Yeager in her office when Mr. Bradly received a telephone call. Ms. Yeager could hear that the caller was District Attorney Willis. District Attorney Willis was calling Mr. Bradley in response to an article that was published about how much money Mr. Wade and his law partners had been paid in this case. Ms. Yeager heard District Attorney Willis tell Mr. Bradley: “They are coming after us. You don’t need to talk to them about anything about us.”
2
• Ms. Yeager watched Mr. Bradley’s testimony before the Court and became concerned as a result of the fact that what Mr. Bradley testified to on the witness stand was directly contrary to what Mr. Bradley had told Ms. Yeager in person.


Why would someone file this after closing?


Evidently, the witness came forward after the hearing. March 1.
And, to the person asking if this is hearsay..... no, it is not. This Deputy DA for Cobb County is willing to testify.
I doubt the judge will reopen the hearing, but it is more evidence that Fani and Nathan lied about their relationship.



Or that someone from Cobb County is willing to spin a yarn for MAGAism.


I find it hard to believe that a deputy DA would put her reputation and career on the line to lie at this point in this case.


DP. Why would you believe that a deputy DA is any less likely to put her reputation and career on the line than the career lawyers who have been disbarred for their work for Trump? Or the lawyers and public officials who risked their careers and jail time to be false electors in multiple states? Or the people who were willing to risk jail time to go and support Trump in Washington DC, then march down to the US Capitol and enter illegally and damage a federal building and try to prevent the US Congress from fulfilling their constitutional duties?

There are many thousands of people of all walks of life and many more significant and lucrative career choices that made choices that were not morally or legally correct in the past to support Trump over the last four years. In a deeply red state, why would you not believe that there is a state employee who would not take risks to help prevent the court case against Trump from proceeding in the hopes that possibly she could get recognition or even some opportunity in the future based on how supportive she's been to the Trump cause.

If Willis and Wade are thrown off of the case, it will only be the nail in the coffin that will ensure that the GA case will go nowhere before the November elections. There are still many out there who think that if none of the criminal cases go against Trump, he will win the November election, be immune from the cases continuing and be able to dismiss some of the cases during his four years in office and pardon any who have already been convicted or serving jail time for previous support of him and his cause.

This deputy DA could easily be making the same mistake that hundreds and thousands have before her over the last four years.


Not Deputy DA but Chief Deputy DA of Cobb County. Big difference and this Chief Deputy DA is putting her reputation and her license/livelihood on the line when most people (especially other prosecutors) would not want to get involved at this late stage.


+1
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Mr. Shafer would offer the testimony of attorney Cindi Lee Yeager, a Co- Chief Deputy District Attorney for the Cobb County, Georgia, District Attorney’s Office.
On Friday, March 1, 2024, Ms. Yeager spoke via telephone with undersigned counsel for Mr. Shafer and Mr. Christopher Anulewicz, counsel for Defendant Robert Cheeley. Following is a summary of the proposed testimony which was provided by Ms. Yeager to counsel for Mr. Shafer and Mr. Cheeley:
• From in or around August of 2023 through January of 2024, Ms. Yeager had numerous, in-person and other conversations with attorney Terence Bradley in which information relating to District Attorney Willis and Mr. Wade was discussed.
• In the course of Mr. Bradley’s and Ms. Yeager’s discussions, Mr. Bradley told Ms. Yeager the following:
District Attorney Willis and Mr. Wade met during the 2019 Municipal Court Continuing Legal Education Conference.
o Mr. Wade began his romantic relationship with District Attorney Willis at or around this time.
o Mr. Wade had definitively begun a romantic relationship with Ms. Willis during the time that Ms. Willis was running for District Attorney in 2019 through 2020.
o Mr. Bradley stated that he had personal knowledge of the relationship between Mr. Wade and District Attorney Willis, and included details regarding the use of Ms. Robin Yeartie’s apartment and other meetings prior to November 2021.
o Mr. Bradley stated that Mr. Wade personally prepared his own divorce complaint against his spouse, Mrs. Jocelyn Wade, and told Mr. Bradley to sign the divorce filings and to file them on Mr. Wade’s behalf. Based upon these statements, it is Ms. Yeager’s understanding that Mr. Bradley did not being representing Mr. Wade until November of 2021.
o In or around September of 2023, Mr. Bradley was visiting Ms. Yeager in her office when Mr. Bradly received a telephone call. Ms. Yeager could hear that the caller was District Attorney Willis. District Attorney Willis was calling Mr. Bradley in response to an article that was published about how much money Mr. Wade and his law partners had been paid in this case. Ms. Yeager heard District Attorney Willis tell Mr. Bradley: “They are coming after us. You don’t need to talk to them about anything about us.”
2
• Ms. Yeager watched Mr. Bradley’s testimony before the Court and became concerned as a result of the fact that what Mr. Bradley testified to on the witness stand was directly contrary to what Mr. Bradley had told Ms. Yeager in person.


Why would someone file this after closing?


Evidently, the witness came forward after the hearing. March 1.
And, to the person asking if this is hearsay..... no, it is not. This Deputy DA for Cobb County is willing to testify.
I doubt the judge will reopen the hearing, but it is more evidence that Fani and Nathan lied about their relationship.



Or that someone from Cobb County is willing to spin a yarn for MAGAism.


I find it hard to believe that a deputy DA would put her reputation and career on the line to lie at this point in this case.


DP. Why would you believe that a deputy DA is any less likely to put her reputation and career on the line than the career lawyers who have been disbarred for their work for Trump? Or the lawyers and public officials who risked their careers and jail time to be false electors in multiple states? Or the people who were willing to risk jail time to go and support Trump in Washington DC, then march down to the US Capitol and enter illegally and damage a federal building and try to prevent the US Congress from fulfilling their constitutional duties?

There are many thousands of people of all walks of life and many more significant and lucrative career choices that made choices that were not morally or legally correct in the past to support Trump over the last four years. In a deeply red state, why would you not believe that there is a state employee who would not take risks to help prevent the court case against Trump from proceeding in the hopes that possibly she could get recognition or even some opportunity in the future based on how supportive she's been to the Trump cause.

If Willis and Wade are thrown off of the case, it will only be the nail in the coffin that will ensure that the GA case will go nowhere before the November elections. There are still many out there who think that if none of the criminal cases go against Trump, he will win the November election, be immune from the cases continuing and be able to dismiss some of the cases during his four years in office and pardon any who have already been convicted or serving jail time for previous support of him and his cause.

This deputy DA could easily be making the same mistake that hundreds and thousands have before her over the last four years.


Not Deputy DA but Chief Deputy DA of Cobb County. Big difference and this Chief Deputy DA is putting her reputation and her license/livelihood on the line when most people (especially other prosecutors) would not want to get involved at this late stage.


Ashley Merchant already did it. Took the case and torched her reputation as a solid lawyer. Oops.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Mr. Shafer would offer the testimony of attorney Cindi Lee Yeager, a Co- Chief Deputy District Attorney for the Cobb County, Georgia, District Attorney’s Office.
On Friday, March 1, 2024, Ms. Yeager spoke via telephone with undersigned counsel for Mr. Shafer and Mr. Christopher Anulewicz, counsel for Defendant Robert Cheeley. Following is a summary of the proposed testimony which was provided by Ms. Yeager to counsel for Mr. Shafer and Mr. Cheeley:
• From in or around August of 2023 through January of 2024, Ms. Yeager had numerous, in-person and other conversations with attorney Terence Bradley in which information relating to District Attorney Willis and Mr. Wade was discussed.
• In the course of Mr. Bradley’s and Ms. Yeager’s discussions, Mr. Bradley told Ms. Yeager the following:
District Attorney Willis and Mr. Wade met during the 2019 Municipal Court Continuing Legal Education Conference.
o Mr. Wade began his romantic relationship with District Attorney Willis at or around this time.
o Mr. Wade had definitively begun a romantic relationship with Ms. Willis during the time that Ms. Willis was running for District Attorney in 2019 through 2020.
o Mr. Bradley stated that he had personal knowledge of the relationship between Mr. Wade and District Attorney Willis, and included details regarding the use of Ms. Robin Yeartie’s apartment and other meetings prior to November 2021.
o Mr. Bradley stated that Mr. Wade personally prepared his own divorce complaint against his spouse, Mrs. Jocelyn Wade, and told Mr. Bradley to sign the divorce filings and to file them on Mr. Wade’s behalf. Based upon these statements, it is Ms. Yeager’s understanding that Mr. Bradley did not being representing Mr. Wade until November of 2021.
o In or around September of 2023, Mr. Bradley was visiting Ms. Yeager in her office when Mr. Bradly received a telephone call. Ms. Yeager could hear that the caller was District Attorney Willis. District Attorney Willis was calling Mr. Bradley in response to an article that was published about how much money Mr. Wade and his law partners had been paid in this case. Ms. Yeager heard District Attorney Willis tell Mr. Bradley: “They are coming after us. You don’t need to talk to them about anything about us.”
2
• Ms. Yeager watched Mr. Bradley’s testimony before the Court and became concerned as a result of the fact that what Mr. Bradley testified to on the witness stand was directly contrary to what Mr. Bradley had told Ms. Yeager in person.


Why would someone file this after closing?


Evidently, the witness came forward after the hearing. March 1.
And, to the person asking if this is hearsay..... no, it is not. This Deputy DA for Cobb County is willing to testify.
I doubt the judge will reopen the hearing, but it is more evidence that Fani and Nathan lied about their relationship.



Or that someone from Cobb County is willing to spin a yarn for MAGAism.


I find it hard to believe that a deputy DA would put her reputation and career on the line to lie at this point in this case.


DP. Why would you believe that a deputy DA is any less likely to put her reputation and career on the line than the career lawyers who have been disbarred for their work for Trump? Or the lawyers and public officials who risked their careers and jail time to be false electors in multiple states? Or the people who were willing to risk jail time to go and support Trump in Washington DC, then march down to the US Capitol and enter illegally and damage a federal building and try to prevent the US Congress from fulfilling their constitutional duties?

There are many thousands of people of all walks of life and many more significant and lucrative career choices that made choices that were not morally or legally correct in the past to support Trump over the last four years. In a deeply red state, why would you not believe that there is a state employee who would not take risks to help prevent the court case against Trump from proceeding in the hopes that possibly she could get recognition or even some opportunity in the future based on how supportive she's been to the Trump cause.

If Willis and Wade are thrown off of the case, it will only be the nail in the coffin that will ensure that the GA case will go nowhere before the November elections. There are still many out there who think that if none of the criminal cases go against Trump, he will win the November election, be immune from the cases continuing and be able to dismiss some of the cases during his four years in office and pardon any who have already been convicted or serving jail time for previous support of him and his cause.

This deputy DA could easily be making the same mistake that hundreds and thousands have before her over the last four years.


Not Deputy DA but Chief Deputy DA of Cobb County. Big difference and this Chief Deputy DA is putting her reputation and her license/livelihood on the line when most people (especially other prosecutors) would not want to get involved at this late stage.


Ashley Merchant already did it. Took the case and torched her reputation as a solid lawyer. Oops.


She came out looking great initially accused of being a liar for filing the Motion by the entire lying/perjuring Prosecution team (notice the supposed Ana Cross left the team after first few days as Special Prosecutor and the pathetic Assistant DA gave the mumbling closing) along with Steve Sadow.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: