It appears Bolton's book undercuts Trump's defense

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
I am curious as to how NYT got the entire book, when both House prosecutors and White House defense were unaware of its exact contents.

Maybe they sent a reporter to a dinner at the Trump hotel?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I am curious as to how NYT got the entire book, when both House prosecutors and White House defense were unaware of its exact contents.

Maybe they sent a reporter to a dinner at the Trump hotel?

Can you imagine if Breitbart got an incriminating book on the Bidens, in advance? Or Obama?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I am curious as to how NYT got the entire book, when both House prosecutors and White House defense were unaware of its exact contents.

Maybe they sent a reporter to a dinner at the Trump hotel?

Can you imagine if Breitbart got an incriminating book on the Bidens, in advance? Or Obama?

If Breitbart got an incriminating book written by Susan Rice about how Obama was violating his oath of office, then Breitbart should publish it.

That's literally what's happening here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Bush= Hitler, until he trashed Trump

Romney= evil white billionaire until he trashed Trump

McCain= evil war monger until he trashed Trump and brought the false dossier to DC. He then became America’s war hero patriot, after that move.

Bolton= war criminal liar, until: today.

No that's how YOU Trumpskyites think of things. There is no nuance to you. We can recognize people can be shitty people and still be important to hear from in something as critical as presidential impeachment. Everyone will determine his credibility and trustworthiness should he testify.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I am curious as to how NYT got the entire book, when both House prosecutors and White House defense were unaware of its exact contents.

Maybe they sent a reporter to a dinner at the Trump hotel?

Can you imagine if Breitbart got an incriminating book on the Bidens, in advance? Or Obama?

They would print it with their usual raging headlines like "MISGENDERED ALIENS ARE TAKING OVER SPACE WITH THE HELP FROM THE RADICAL LEFT: MORE IN THIS EXPLOSIVE EXCERPT FROM JILL BIDEN'S LEAKED BOOK DRAFT"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I am curious as to how NYT got the entire book, when both House prosecutors and White House defense were unaware of its exact contents.

Maybe they sent a reporter to a dinner at the Trump hotel?

Can you imagine if Breitbart got an incriminating book on the Bidens, in advance? Or Obama?

They would print it with their usual raging headlines like "MISGENDERED ALIENS ARE TAKING OVER SPACE WITH THE HELP FROM THE RADICAL LEFT: MORE IN THIS EXPLOSIVE EXCERPT FROM JILL BIDEN'S LEAKED BOOK DRAFT"

OMG I totally want to read that book now

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Graham wants to see the manuscript!

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/480205-graham-says-he-wants-to-see-bolton-manuscript

so Graham can scratch his and Trump's names from it, or shred the whole thing
I doubt Trump will allow Bolton to publish anything juicy

[Anonymous]

The White House is reportedly considering taking out a restraining order to silence John Bolton.

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/01/john-bolton-book-impeachment?utm_source=twitter&utm_brand=vf&utm_social-type=owned&utm_medium=social&mbid=social_twitter

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The White House is reportedly considering taking out a restraining order to silence John Bolton.

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/01/john-bolton-book-impeachment?utm_source=twitter&utm_brand=vf&utm_social-type=owned&utm_medium=social&mbid=social_twitter

Because that's what people do when they're perfectly innocent.

[Anonymous]

Why no discussion of Peter Sweitzer's new book: Profiles in Corruption?

https://www.amazon.com/Profiles-Corruption-Peter-Schweizer/dp/006289790X/ref=sr_1_1?crid=3A8PH7HNAG8HH&keywords=profiles+in+corruption&qid=1580228783&s=books&sprefix=pr%2Caps%2C462&sr=1-1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why no discussion of Peter Sweitzer's new book: Profiles in Corruption?

https://www.amazon.com/Profiles-Corruption-Peter-Schweizer/dp/006289790X/ref=sr_1_1?crid=3A8PH7HNAG8HH&keywords=profiles+in+corruption&qid=1580228783&s=books&sprefix=pr%2Caps%2C462&sr=1-1

Because he wasn't the National Security Advisor writing about the POTUS who appointed him?

Bolton book is the political equivalent of a nuclear bomb going off on the National Mall. How many senior-level people have dropped a dime on a POTUS in the middle of impeachment? There's basically only two others in history - Deep Throat and John Dean. Bolton's name will be in the history books next to those two.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Bush= Hitler, until he trashed Trump

Romney= evil white billionaire until he trashed Trump

McCain= evil war monger until he trashed Trump and brought the false dossier to DC. He then became America’s war hero patriot, after that move.

Bolton= war criminal liar, until: today.

That's exactly what terrifies us: that even the evil billionaires and warmongers and war criminals think Trump crosses the line.

+1 Even some criminals draw the line somewhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The White House is reportedly considering taking out a restraining order to silence John Bolton.

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/01/john-bolton-book-impeachment?utm_source=twitter&utm_brand=vf&utm_social-type=owned&utm_medium=social&mbid=social_twitter

Because that's what people do when they're perfectly innocent.

Yup silencing the people who were on the front-line and claiming there is no evidence...

[Anonymous]

John Kelly tells ‘I believe John Bolton’ and supports calling witnesses

Trump is denying that he told former National Security Adviser John Bolton he wanted to withhold military aid from Ukraine until the country launched investigations into Joe Biden and his son, allegations that Bolton levies in his new book, according to news reports.

But one of Trump’s former top aides told a Sarasota crowd Monday evening that if the reporting on what Bolton wrote is accurate, he believes Bolton.

“If John Bolton says that in the book I believe John Bolton,” said retired Gen. John Kelly, who served as Trump’s chief of staff for 18 months.

If there is a dispute between Trump and another person, most sane people would believe the other person.

[Anonymous]

John Kelly needs to step up. All of the former officials need to step up.