Who knew that when Trump was ranting about Mueller and it being a witch hunt, he was actually on to something! |
+1. I was truly surprised yesterday. Trump couldn't prove himself innocent so he's guilty -- what kind of lawyer or public official thinks that way outside of totalitarian regimes? |
It's amazing how Trump fanatics don't want to believe what Mueller really said. He clearly told Congress it was their job to take up the issue now. He also CLEARLY said it was clear the Russians wanted Trump in office, and did everything they could to make sure that happened. |
Tell us, based on a looooooooong report: What crime was committed? When? Where? By whom? Mueller's report explicitly said there is no evidence of collussion or cooperation with the Russians by Trump. So why are you making things up? Incidentally, did you know that the Ukraine government actively helped the Hillary campaign? And that, while all this foreign interference was going on, we did have a President in the White House? Who was in charge of the most extensive security apparatus the world has ever known? |
No we believe what Mueller said, we are just pointing out that it wasn't Mueller's job to assist Congress to build a case for impeachment. His job was to investigate Russian collusion and criminal obstruction of justice. He did so with regards to Russian collusion and stated his findings that there was sufficient evidence to find Russian meddling in US elections, but insufficient evidence to find a broader conspiracy involving Trump. However, he failed to do his job with regards to the obstruction investigation, refusing to state whether or not he found sufficient evidence for criminal obstruction. He left it up to the interpretation of others, so don't go crying "this is not what I had in mind" when the interpreting doesn't go your way. In the end, Mueller tried to be cute with his report. The fact that he did not charge *ANYONE* in Trump's campaign with criminal obstruction even though *THEY* are not immune to prosecution demonstrates that his refusal to come to a decision is based on insufficiency of evidence. So instead of giving Trump a clear win, he decided that he wants to instead transform the report into a roadmap for Congress to seek impeachment. |
What a travesty of "justice." |
Mueller:
Person X - He's not innocent. Person Y - He's not guilty. lol So . . .if you can't prove he's guilty, he's innocent in the eyes of the "court" b/c there's doubt - or not enough proof. And again, the Senate is mostly Rs and they follow party line. They are the jury during an impeachment process. |
He is not not not guilty ![]() |
And when he said they were spying on his campaign and dc elites and media laughed and laughed. Now the investigations are rolling and people are sharting themselves. |
+1. Mueller: “I don’t have any evidence but that doesn’t mean he’s innocent.” Me: Ummmm, it kind of does actually. |
Trump needs to go. He is a criminal and a liar! Trump supporters are literally the dumbest people in America. |
No. He’s guilty and a total criminal. Impeach his ass. Trump supporters don’t respect the law. |
Grandma, it’s almost time for days of our lives, turn of the computer. |
+2 |
Long reports are intimidating to you, huh? The only people making things up are Trump and his supporters. The crime, dear idiot friend, is obstruction of justice. |