|
+1 I thought it was pretty much a given that parents would do whatever it takes to help their children get ahead. I'd be willing to eat beans to send my kid to Columbia. |
Geesh. Move to a smaller house. |
It seems like they all married Columbia grads. |
Is this a real question? |
I'm going to assume that you really are that out of touch, that you are truly that insulated in your bubble, and this is a real question. DH and I are professional adults, both with graduate degrees. Our HHI is $220. We have two children. We have not always made this much. Our take-home net pay after retirement, health insurance, etc. is about $10,500/month. Is it rational to think that we can dedicate $6K/month (and rising each year) to one child's higher education and live on the remainder? |
| Colleges and some state legislatures are waking up to the problem. Univ of Michigan is the latest example - free tuition for in/ state students from families making less than $65K |
And those that make $75,000? |
+ 1 |
Is this a joke? You think every educated professional has an extra $60k a year after taxes? |
People are idiots. |
I love the elitist on DCUM, always classy. In many fields, Ivy League really doesn't mean much. Spending a ton of money on college is often a bad move financially. That extra 200k that you saved could end up being over a million if you invest it instead. And that is money that you might need for retirement or maybe your kids inheritance. |
\ You people are nuts. |
+1. |
Good point. Not only would the parent be going into debt at a time that should be the most financially secure of their life, they are also not able to save for retirement fully which can have major consequences. Increasing the odds that your kids are going to need to support you financially in your old age is just a shitty financial decision, pure and simple. |