Revolving Door at Holton

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No, his license was previously suspended for misconduct and he hasn't renewed it for over a year while practicing psychology without a license. He can't even renew it anymore and has to go before the board to get it reinstated.

After suspended was granted for the next 30 years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you go to the website the license was valid until December 2024. If something so bad happened with him, how come he was still allowed to work in Massachusetts. What you are doing is called libel FYI and typically penalized by law.

Lol. Once again, it's not libel.
1. His license was suspended for misconduct.
2. He doesn't have a valid license to practice psychology.
3. He can't even renew it at this point and has to get it reinstated.

That information cannot be confirmed in the Massachusetts website only in your twisted mind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you go to the website the license was valid until December 2024. If something so bad happened with him, how come he was still allowed to work in Massachusetts. What you are doing is called libel FYI and typically penalized by law.

It wasn't valid until December. It was valid until June 2024. It can't be renewed and must be reinstated. It's not libelous or defamatory to point out that he's practicing psychology without a license. Additionally, if you look at the "work" he's doing at schools. It's clear he's actually practicing psychology instead of speaking. Would you trust a doctor that doesn't have a valid license to practice medicine. Also, do you understand how difficult it is to get your license suspended in Massachusetts?

You need to work more on your reading skills because that information is not posted in the Massachusetts website.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you go to the website the license was valid until December 2024. If something so bad happened with him, how come he was still allowed to work in Massachusetts. What you are doing is called libel FYI and typically penalized by law.

It wasn't valid until December. It was valid until June 2024. It can't be renewed and must be reinstated. It's not libelous or defamatory to point out that he's practicing psychology without a license. Additionally, if you look at the "work" he's doing at schools. It's clear he's actually practicing psychology instead of speaking. Would you trust a doctor that doesn't have a valid license to practice medicine. Also, do you understand how difficult it is to get your license suspended in Massachusetts?

You need to work more on your reading skills because that information is not posted in the Massachusetts website.

https://www.mass.gov/info-details/health-professions-licensing-system-user-guide
Perhaps you should get out of DC. I swear the dumbest people in the country live in this town

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you go to the website the license was valid until December 2024. If something so bad happened with him, how come he was still allowed to work in Massachusetts. What you are doing is called libel FYI and typically penalized by law.

Lol. Once again, it's not libel.
1. His license was suspended for misconduct.
2. He doesn't have a valid license to practice psychology.
3. He can't even renew it at this point and has to get it reinstated.

That information cannot be confirmed in the Massachusetts website only in your twisted mind.

Lol. STOP LYING. I know you want to protect this dude to prove a point but saying things that you know are false is completely uncalled for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you go to the website the license was valid until December 2024. If something so bad happened with him, how come he was still allowed to work in Massachusetts. What you are doing is called libel FYI and typically penalized by law.

It wasn't valid until December. It was valid until June 2024. It can't be renewed and must be reinstated. It's not libelous or defamatory to point out that he's practicing psychology without a license. Additionally, if you look at the "work" he's doing at schools. It's clear he's actually practicing psychology instead of speaking. Would you trust a doctor that doesn't have a valid license to practice medicine. Also, do you understand how difficult it is to get your license suspended in Massachusetts?

You need to work more on your reading skills because that information is not posted in the Massachusetts website.

https://www.mass.gov/info-details/health-professions-licensing-system-user-guide
Perhaps you should get out of DC. I swear the dumbest people in the country live in this town

Illiterate teacher ☝️

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you go to the website the license was valid until December 2024. If something so bad happened with him, how come he was still allowed to work in Massachusetts. What you are doing is called libel FYI and typically penalized by law.

Lol. Once again, it's not libel.
1. His license was suspended for misconduct.
2. He doesn't have a valid license to practice psychology.
3. He can't even renew it at this point and has to get it reinstated.

That information cannot be confirmed in the Massachusetts website only in your twisted mind.

Lol. STOP LYING. I know you want to protect this dude to prove a point but saying things that you know are false is completely uncalled for.

Get new prescription glasses and go check the website again.

[Anonymous]

It’s so easy to spot false rumors in this thread 🥱.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Illiterate teacher ☝️

I certainly hope you aren't sending your kids to such an expensive school where you believe the teachers are illiterate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Illiterate teacher ☝️

I certainly hope you aren't sending your kids to such an expensive school where you believe the teachers are illiterate.

Referring only to the teacher that cannot understand basic information from the state of Massachusetts website. And yes, I wouldn’t send my kid to a school where teachers promote cyber bullying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[

Referring only to the teacher that cannot understand basic information from the state of Massachusetts website. And yes, I wouldn’t send my kid to a school where teachers promote cyber bullying.

You've committed an awful lot of time and energy to this thread for someone who's not even part of the community

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[

Referring only to the teacher that cannot understand basic information from the state of Massachusetts website. And yes, I wouldn’t send my kid to a school where teachers promote cyber bullying.

You've committed an awful lot of time and energy to this thread for someone who's not even part of the community

Yes, just let’s focus only on the false accusations made by members of the connunity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Yes, just let’s focus only on the false accusations made by members of the connunity.

And the teachers are the illiterate ones?

I think we should focus more on what those that have nothing to do with the community have to say.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Yes, just let’s focus only on the false accusations made by members of the connunity.

And the teachers are the illiterate ones?

I think we should focus more on what those that have nothing to do with the community have to say.

Sure. You can continue doing cyber bullying. No problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Yes, just let’s focus only on the false accusations made by members of the connunity.

And the teachers are the illiterate ones?

I think we should focus more on what those that have nothing to do with the community have to say.

It should be “those who” when you are talking about people.

Who is illiterate?