It's 2025. When will you left-wing people stop with the identity politics? It is such a political loser. Virtue signaling is no longer in fashion bud. When you view a few new apartments as an attack on "Black and Latino" people you are really off in the deep end champ. |
A white person buying a house also reduces "Black and Latino" homeownership. Should we ban that? Why not? (Hint: when you view the economy as zero-sum you get stuck in these silly arguments that you can't solve, because you didn't take Econ 101) |
No we shouldn’t ban that because when a person (regardless of race) buys a house it removes that buyer from the market and lets other houses trickle down. |
Assuming no migration, holding a bunch of other things constant, so much so that if you wait long enough you’ve simplified the model until even the YImBYs can understand it. |
If I have to pick one, definitely mansions. Is this a real question? |
OK, but you'd be wrong. |
Thanks for seeing what I did there, simplifying a model to the point where it has neither explanatory nor predictive value and bears little resemblance to real economics. |
It’s actually quite a feat to be as clueless as the YIMBYs. |
That’s dumb. Your logic is dumb. Either you are hopelessly altruistic or totally self-serving, depending on where you are on the economic scale. |
This is the core of YIMBY economic theory, so, yeah. |
Mansions help a small number of rich people, while denser units provide more affordable housing to a larger number of people, putting less burden on roads north of the area. |
No, what you’re doing is pushing people who want to own homes further north, so you end up with the same burden on roads near UB and more burden north of the area. In the best realistic case, you’ll get some apartments produced near UB but at the expense of less production in established dense areas. There’s no question the new zoning will make the land near UB more expensive. If your plan makes land more expensive, you’re not for cheaper housing. You’re just for more expensive land. |
Does the county have any plans for the dead areas on 29 north of Tech Rd./ICC entrance? Seems like there’s a ton of empty space there and plenty of Metrobus options. |
The land near UB will get more expensive either way. The issue is the price per housing unit. It's a net win if density increases more than the value per unit of area. And if you're housing more people closer to job centers, the commuting miles will decrease overall even if some people get pushed further out. |
You can have areas for both. In fact, we do. There are apartments and townhomes all over the county. Your argument is very silly. |