Physicians Assistant yelling “HELP ME” while stealing a CitiBike ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope there’s a security camera that got the whole thing from the beginning. If I were a pregnant woman who got on the bike but hadn’t completed the rental transaction and multiple men came up to me and said that the bike was already rented, I, as a reasonable person, would have hopped off the bike and rented the one right next to it. Everything about her reaction is off and yes, she was fake crying.

So you think they forced her off the bike but still think she's unreasonable because her response was not "oh, okay, yes I will move since you physically intimidated me into doing so"?

Ok.

No, I’m saying someone who is concerned with her safety (and that of her fetus) would take the path of least resistance. Why would anyone put up a fight over a bike they hadn’t rented yet when there’s an available one right next to it? Only someone who welcomes confrontation would do that.

Seriously?

Yes, seriously. That’s what the majority of pregnant women would do.

Would the majority of non-pregnant men physically force a pregnant woman off a bike that she was trying to rent?

Why are we even evaluating her behavior. The men in the video are the ones being problematic.

You clearly never watched the video and are instead trolling. She was never physically forced to do anything.

If anything, she's trying to physically force him off the bike, but DCUM doesn't want to see that because white woman solidarity is incredible.

Yes, she’s trying to force him to let go of the bike he tried to cut in line to take from her.

What’s your point?

Is there more video that the one posted on page 1 of this thread? If not, that’s a fabrication.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope there’s a security camera that got the whole thing from the beginning. If I were a pregnant woman who got on the bike but hadn’t completed the rental transaction and multiple men came up to me and said that the bike was already rented, I, as a reasonable person, would have hopped off the bike and rented the one right next to it. Everything about her reaction is off and yes, she was fake crying.

So you think they forced her off the bike but still think she's unreasonable because her response was not "oh, okay, yes I will move since you physically intimidated me into doing so"?

Ok.

No, I’m saying someone who is concerned with her safety (and that of her fetus) would take the path of least resistance. Why would anyone put up a fight over a bike they hadn’t rented yet when there’s an available one right next to it? Only someone who welcomes confrontation would do that.

Seriously?

Yes, seriously. That’s what the majority of pregnant women would do.

Would the majority of non-pregnant men physically force a pregnant woman off a bike that she was trying to rent?

Why are we even evaluating her behavior. The men in the video are the ones being problematic.

There’s nothing in the video that makes them problematic. Either the guy had rented that bike or he truly believed he had. None of the men did anything but ask her to give up the bike one of them had rented. They didn’t threaten her, curse her out, call her names or physically assault her. Her questionable crying was the only indication that she was scared. She ignored the obvious solution, which was to rent another readily available bike. She never once disputed that the guy had rented the bike and claimed that she had.

YOU HEAR THE BIKE UNLOCK 20 SECONDS INTO THE VIDEO.

It is only then that he starts showing people his phone and saying he paid for the bike. He paid for the bike after she'd already gotten on it, while holding the bike and blocking the QR code so she can't use it.

Like it's all in the video. You all are making up these imaginary scenarios -- he already rented it, he rented it and walked away, etc. But if you watch the video, you see a woman sitting on a docked bike, and then you see him use the QR code to rent the bike she is sitting on. In the video. No imaginary scenario.

That guy ignored the obvious solution, which was to not rent a bike a woman was sitting on, and instead rent one of the many bikes no one was sitting on. That would have solved the problem immediately. But then we couldn't all sit around calling this woman and Karen and accusing her of fake crying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope there’s a security camera that got the whole thing from the beginning. If I were a pregnant woman who got on the bike but hadn’t completed the rental transaction and multiple men came up to me and said that the bike was already rented, I, as a reasonable person, would have hopped off the bike and rented the one right next to it. Everything about her reaction is off and yes, she was fake crying.

So you think they forced her off the bike but still think she's unreasonable because her response was not "oh, okay, yes I will move since you physically intimidated me into doing so"?

Ok.

No, I’m saying someone who is concerned with her safety (and that of her fetus) would take the path of least resistance. Why would anyone put up a fight over a bike they hadn’t rented yet when there’s an available one right next to it? Only someone who welcomes confrontation would do that.

Seriously?

Yes, seriously. That’s what the majority of pregnant women would do.

Would the majority of non-pregnant men physically force a pregnant woman off a bike that she was trying to rent?

Why are we even evaluating her behavior. The men in the video are the ones being problematic.

You clearly never watched the video and are instead trolling. She was never physically forced to do anything.

If anything, she's trying to physically force him off the bike, but DCUM doesn't want to see that because white woman solidarity is incredible.

Yes, she’s trying to force him to let go of the bike he tried to cut in line to take from her.

What’s your point?

So she’s the aggressor and is actually endangering him? She snatched his phone, yells at him and touched him. He should have feared for his life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“I will and I can” are her last words in the video. But before she rather asked for help and faked cried than rent another bike?

So she was stealing, or not? Just to be clear.

Because it sure seems like some people are mad about how she reacted when HE cut in line, now that it’s clear she was never stealing at all.

It’s only clear on DCUM that she wasn’t stealing bc DCUM is full of people like her. The rest of the world sees her for the person she is.

Watch the video.

She is sitting on the bike.

20 second into the video, he uses his phone to unlock the bike.

Where is she "stealing" the bike.

You hear the sound of a bike being rented, but you have no way of knowing which bike because they’re very close together.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope there’s a security camera that got the whole thing from the beginning. If I were a pregnant woman who got on the bike but hadn’t completed the rental transaction and multiple men came up to me and said that the bike was already rented, I, as a reasonable person, would have hopped off the bike and rented the one right next to it. Everything about her reaction is off and yes, she was fake crying.

So you think they forced her off the bike but still think she's unreasonable because her response was not "oh, okay, yes I will move since you physically intimidated me into doing so"?

Ok.

No, I’m saying someone who is concerned with her safety (and that of her fetus) would take the path of least resistance. Why would anyone put up a fight over a bike they hadn’t rented yet when there’s an available one right next to it? Only someone who welcomes confrontation would do that.

Seriously?

Yes, seriously. That’s what the majority of pregnant women would do.

Would the majority of non-pregnant men physically force a pregnant woman off a bike that she was trying to rent?

Why are we even evaluating her behavior. The men in the video are the ones being problematic.

You clearly never watched the video and are instead trolling. She was never physically forced to do anything.

If anything, she's trying to physically force him off the bike, but DCUM doesn't want to see that because white woman solidarity is incredible.

Yes, she’s trying to force him to let go of the bike he tried to cut in line to take from her.

What’s your point?

Is there more video that the one posted on page 1 of this thread? If not, that’s a fabrication.

The video posted in this thread shows that he scanned the code for the bike she was sitting on, then blocked her from scanning the code herself to attach it to her own account.

For some reason media is running with this calling it an attempted theft, but of course the only thing he’s trying to stop her from doing is attaching the bike to her own account. He doesn’t WANT her to assign it to her account (so he couldn’t get charged for the theft).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope there’s a security camera that got the whole thing from the beginning. If I were a pregnant woman who got on the bike but hadn’t completed the rental transaction and multiple men came up to me and said that the bike was already rented, I, as a reasonable person, would have hopped off the bike and rented the one right next to it. Everything about her reaction is off and yes, she was fake crying.

So you think they forced her off the bike but still think she's unreasonable because her response was not "oh, okay, yes I will move since you physically intimidated me into doing so"?

Ok.

No, I’m saying someone who is concerned with her safety (and that of her fetus) would take the path of least resistance. Why would anyone put up a fight over a bike they hadn’t rented yet when there’s an available one right next to it? Only someone who welcomes confrontation would do that.

Seriously?

Yes, seriously. That’s what the majority of pregnant women would do.

Would the majority of non-pregnant men physically force a pregnant woman off a bike that she was trying to rent?

Why are we even evaluating her behavior. The men in the video are the ones being problematic.

You clearly never watched the video and are instead trolling. She was never physically forced to do anything.

If anything, she's trying to physically force him off the bike, but DCUM doesn't want to see that because white woman solidarity is incredible.

Yes, she’s trying to force him to let go of the bike he tried to cut in line to take from her.

What’s your point?

So she’s the aggressor and is actually endangering him? She snatched his phone, yells at him and touched him. He should have feared for his life.

I know when I am afraid for my life or property what I do is hold on to the vehicle they’re on so they can’t possibly leave :roll:

He doesn’t let her leave because he’s a bully.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“I will and I can” are her last words in the video. But before she rather asked for help and faked cried than rent another bike?

So she was stealing, or not? Just to be clear.

Because it sure seems like some people are mad about how she reacted when HE cut in line, now that it’s clear she was never stealing at all.

It’s only clear on DCUM that she wasn’t stealing bc DCUM is full of people like her. The rest of the world sees her for the person she is.

Watch the video.

She is sitting on the bike.

20 second into the video, he uses his phone to unlock the bike.

Where is she "stealing" the bike.

You hear the sound of a bike being rented, but you have no way of knowing which bike because they’re very close together.

When you hear the chunk and chime of the bike being unlocked, you can see the bike physically move back. That's the bike being unlocked.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope there’s a security camera that got the whole thing from the beginning. If I were a pregnant woman who got on the bike but hadn’t completed the rental transaction and multiple men came up to me and said that the bike was already rented, I, as a reasonable person, would have hopped off the bike and rented the one right next to it. Everything about her reaction is off and yes, she was fake crying.

So you think they forced her off the bike but still think she's unreasonable because her response was not "oh, okay, yes I will move since you physically intimidated me into doing so"?

Ok.

No, I’m saying someone who is concerned with her safety (and that of her fetus) would take the path of least resistance. Why would anyone put up a fight over a bike they hadn’t rented yet when there’s an available one right next to it? Only someone who welcomes confrontation would do that.

Seriously?

Yes, seriously. That’s what the majority of pregnant women would do.

Would the majority of non-pregnant men physically force a pregnant woman off a bike that she was trying to rent?

Why are we even evaluating her behavior. The men in the video are the ones being problematic.

There’s nothing in the video that makes them problematic. Either the guy had rented that bike or he truly believed he had. None of the men did anything but ask her to give up the bike one of them had rented. They didn’t threaten her, curse her out, call her names or physically assault her. Her questionable crying was the only indication that she was scared. She ignored the obvious solution, which was to rent another readily available bike. She never once disputed that the guy had rented the bike and claimed that she had.

YOU HEAR THE BIKE UNLOCK 20 SECONDS INTO THE VIDEO.

It is only then that he starts showing people his phone and saying he paid for the bike. He paid for the bike after she'd already gotten on it, while holding the bike and blocking the QR code so she can't use it.

Like it's all in the video. You all are making up these imaginary scenarios -- he already rented it, he rented it and walked away, etc. But if you watch the video, you see a woman sitting on a docked bike, and then you see him use the QR code to rent the bike she is sitting on. In the video. No imaginary scenario.

That guy ignored the obvious solution, which was to not rent a bike a woman was sitting on, and instead rent one of the many bikes no one was sitting on. That would have solved the problem immediately. But then we couldn't all sit around calling this woman and Karen and accusing her of fake crying.

You hear *a bike* unlock. You have no idea which one. There’s a row of bikes, close together. One of the other men is right up against another bike. He could have unlocked that one. You have no proof of your theory.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope there’s a security camera that got the whole thing from the beginning. If I were a pregnant woman who got on the bike but hadn’t completed the rental transaction and multiple men came up to me and said that the bike was already rented, I, as a reasonable person, would have hopped off the bike and rented the one right next to it. Everything about her reaction is off and yes, she was fake crying.

So you think they forced her off the bike but still think she's unreasonable because her response was not "oh, okay, yes I will move since you physically intimidated me into doing so"?

Ok.

No, I’m saying someone who is concerned with her safety (and that of her fetus) would take the path of least resistance. Why would anyone put up a fight over a bike they hadn’t rented yet when there’s an available one right next to it? Only someone who welcomes confrontation would do that.

Seriously?

Yes, seriously. That’s what the majority of pregnant women would do.

Would the majority of non-pregnant men physically force a pregnant woman off a bike that she was trying to rent?

Why are we even evaluating her behavior. The men in the video are the ones being problematic.

There’s nothing in the video that makes them problematic. Either the guy had rented that bike or he truly believed he had. None of the men did anything but ask her to give up the bike one of them had rented. They didn’t threaten her, curse her out, call her names or physically assault her. Her questionable crying was the only indication that she was scared. She ignored the obvious solution, which was to rent another readily available bike. She never once disputed that the guy had rented the bike and claimed that she had.

YOU HEAR THE BIKE UNLOCK 20 SECONDS INTO THE VIDEO.

It is only then that he starts showing people his phone and saying he paid for the bike. He paid for the bike after she'd already gotten on it, while holding the bike and blocking the QR code so she can't use it.

Like it's all in the video. You all are making up these imaginary scenarios -- he already rented it, he rented it and walked away, etc. But if you watch the video, you see a woman sitting on a docked bike, and then you see him use the QR code to rent the bike she is sitting on. In the video. No imaginary scenario.

That guy ignored the obvious solution, which was to not rent a bike a woman was sitting on, and instead rent one of the many bikes no one was sitting on. That would have solved the problem immediately. But then we couldn't all sit around calling this woman and Karen and accusing her of fake crying.

You hear *a bike* unlock. You have no idea which one. There’s a row of bikes, close together. One of the other men is right up against another bike. He could have unlocked that one. You have no proof of your theory.

You can both see and hear the bike unlock.

I mean you could if you were open to accepting that your first take was wrong. But you’re not, so you can’t.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope there’s a security camera that got the whole thing from the beginning. If I were a pregnant woman who got on the bike but hadn’t completed the rental transaction and multiple men came up to me and said that the bike was already rented, I, as a reasonable person, would have hopped off the bike and rented the one right next to it. Everything about her reaction is off and yes, she was fake crying.

So you think they forced her off the bike but still think she's unreasonable because her response was not "oh, okay, yes I will move since you physically intimidated me into doing so"?

Ok.

No, I’m saying someone who is concerned with her safety (and that of her fetus) would take the path of least resistance. Why would anyone put up a fight over a bike they hadn’t rented yet when there’s an available one right next to it? Only someone who welcomes confrontation would do that.

Seriously?

Yes, seriously. That’s what the majority of pregnant women would do.

Would the majority of non-pregnant men physically force a pregnant woman off a bike that she was trying to rent?

Why are we even evaluating her behavior. The men in the video are the ones being problematic.

There’s nothing in the video that makes them problematic. Either the guy had rented that bike or he truly believed he had. None of the men did anything but ask her to give up the bike one of them had rented. They didn’t threaten her, curse her out, call her names or physically assault her. Her questionable crying was the only indication that she was scared. She ignored the obvious solution, which was to rent another readily available bike. She never once disputed that the guy had rented the bike and claimed that she had.

YOU HEAR THE BIKE UNLOCK 20 SECONDS INTO THE VIDEO.

It is only then that he starts showing people his phone and saying he paid for the bike. He paid for the bike after she'd already gotten on it, while holding the bike and blocking the QR code so she can't use it.

Like it's all in the video. You all are making up these imaginary scenarios -- he already rented it, he rented it and walked away, etc. But if you watch the video, you see a woman sitting on a docked bike, and then you see him use the QR code to rent the bike she is sitting on. In the video. No imaginary scenario.

That guy ignored the obvious solution, which was to not rent a bike a woman was sitting on, and instead rent one of the many bikes no one was sitting on. That would have solved the problem immediately. But then we couldn't all sit around calling this woman and Karen and accusing her of fake crying.

You hear *a bike* unlock. You have no idea which one. There’s a row of bikes, close together. One of the other men is right up against another bike. He could have unlocked that one. You have no proof of your theory.

The bike moves back when it unlocks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope there’s a security camera that got the whole thing from the beginning. If I were a pregnant woman who got on the bike but hadn’t completed the rental transaction and multiple men came up to me and said that the bike was already rented, I, as a reasonable person, would have hopped off the bike and rented the one right next to it. Everything about her reaction is off and yes, she was fake crying.

So you think they forced her off the bike but still think she's unreasonable because her response was not "oh, okay, yes I will move since you physically intimidated me into doing so"?

Ok.

No, I’m saying someone who is concerned with her safety (and that of her fetus) would take the path of least resistance. Why would anyone put up a fight over a bike they hadn’t rented yet when there’s an available one right next to it? Only someone who welcomes confrontation would do that.

Seriously?

Yes, seriously. That’s what the majority of pregnant women would do.

Would the majority of non-pregnant men physically force a pregnant woman off a bike that she was trying to rent?

Why are we even evaluating her behavior. The men in the video are the ones being problematic.

You clearly never watched the video and are instead trolling. She was never physically forced to do anything.

If anything, she's trying to physically force him off the bike, but DCUM doesn't want to see that because white woman solidarity is incredible.

Yes, she’s trying to force him to let go of the bike he tried to cut in line to take from her.

What’s your point?

Is there more video that the one posted on page 1 of this thread? If not, that’s a fabrication.

The video posted in this thread shows that he scanned the code for the bike she was sitting on, then blocked her from scanning the code herself to attach it to her own account.

For some reason media is running with this calling it an attempted theft, but of course the only thing he’s trying to stop her from doing is attaching the bike to her own account. He doesn’t WANT her to assign it to her account (so he couldn’t get charged for the theft).

Her phone was in the breast pocket of her scrubs until she was done trying to use that particular bike. She never had her phone out until the end. What are you talking about?

[Anonymous]

Please tell me there is just one poster trying to defend the woman taking the bike to ride it on another person's dime! Look at her half giggling "what can I get away with" face, it's sick but I am sure her coworkers know how she is too. I bet she's stolen some lunches from the fridge. There are people who think nothing of getting what they can get away with.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“I will and I can” are her last words in the video. But before she rather asked for help and faked cried than rent another bike?

Why are people still saying she "fake cried"?

She is sitting on a bike. A man walks up and attempts to push her off of it while he scans the QR code and unlocks the bike. Three other men surround her and tell her it's not her bike and she can't have it.

She isn't fake crying. She is actually upset. Sorry her manifestation of being upset/frustrated does not read as "genuine" to you. It's kind of irrelevant since she did nothing wrong (except cry in a way you find insufficiently convincing I guess?) and this group of men bullied her off a bike.

And she does go rent another bike. They successfully steal the first one from her, she goes and rents another one. The entire interaction lasts maybe two minutes and then she gives up and goes to another bike. How long is an acceptable length of time to try and stand up for yourself? How much liquid must a person's tears produce to be genuine? Please police this woman's behavior Tymore while a group of men physically intimidate her and demand she get off a bike that was available when she sat on it.

Sorry as a currently pregnant white lady who has rented bikes I find this is the least likely scenario. And I actually thought the chipotle couple was mostly in the right.

Here’s my take:
The guys were checking out probably the last bikes. They were dawdling, maybe checking eachothers’ phones or whatever, but clearly standing next to the bikes. She tries to swoop in by sitting on one because apparently she is in a big hurry. Why would anyone sit on a bike before you swipe? It’s almost impossible to swipe from sitting on the bike. She’s only doing that to try to take it from someone else and get them to give it up.

They tell her no way we were here first these are ours, and they swipe to confirm it. She thinks she can make a fuss and scare them off. why would anyone yell help when no one is restraining you and you literally have nothing to lose since you haven’t swiped the bike out yet? what do you need help with?

then poor kid in the right says let’s just give this crazy lady my bike since I haven’t swiped it yet. His friends are saying no that’s not fair, but she of course does it anyway, and suddenly now that she has a (different) bike she’s no longer scared and crying or needing “help.”

She tried to take advantage of these kids and got caught. She knew exactly what she was doing and deserves to lose credibility. If she had acted this way to a group of nuns everyone would be calling her out and assuming she was in the wrong. She tried to weaponize her pregnancy, gender, and their race and I find that personally offensive as a pregnant lady who would never act this way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope there’s a security camera that got the whole thing from the beginning. If I were a pregnant woman who got on the bike but hadn’t completed the rental transaction and multiple men came up to me and said that the bike was already rented, I, as a reasonable person, would have hopped off the bike and rented the one right next to it. Everything about her reaction is off and yes, she was fake crying.

So you think they forced her off the bike but still think she's unreasonable because her response was not "oh, okay, yes I will move since you physically intimidated me into doing so"?

Ok.

No, I’m saying someone who is concerned with her safety (and that of her fetus) would take the path of least resistance. Why would anyone put up a fight over a bike they hadn’t rented yet when there’s an available one right next to it? Only someone who welcomes confrontation would do that.

Seriously?

Yes, seriously. That’s what the majority of pregnant women would do.

Would the majority of non-pregnant men physically force a pregnant woman off a bike that she was trying to rent?

Why are we even evaluating her behavior. The men in the video are the ones being problematic.

You clearly never watched the video and are instead trolling. She was never physically forced to do anything.

If anything, she's trying to physically force him off the bike, but DCUM doesn't want to see that because white woman solidarity is incredible.

Yes, she’s trying to force him to let go of the bike he tried to cut in line to take from her.

What’s your point?

Is there more video that the one posted on page 1 of this thread? If not, that’s a fabrication.

The video posted in this thread shows that he scanned the code for the bike she was sitting on, then blocked her from scanning the code herself to attach it to her own account.

For some reason media is running with this calling it an attempted theft, but of course the only thing he’s trying to stop her from doing is attaching the bike to her own account. He doesn’t WANT her to assign it to her account (so he couldn’t get charged for the theft).

Her phone was in the breast pocket of her scrubs until she was done trying to use that particular bike. She never had her phone out until the end. What are you talking about?

He has his hand over the QR code so that she can’t scan it. That’s why his hand is there. Not so she can’t steal it from him under his account. So she can’t attach it to her own account.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Please tell me there is just one poster trying to defend the woman taking the bike to ride it on another person's dime! Look at her half giggling "what can I get away with" face, it's sick but I am sure her coworkers know how she is too. I bet she's stolen some lunches from the fridge. There are people who think nothing of getting what they can get away with.

She 100% wasn’t doing this. That’s why his hand is where it is. Otherwise I don’t know what’s happening. But it CLEARLY is not this.

If there’s some other explanation that makes her the villain, fine. But this ain’t it.