Roe v Wade struck down

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ruth warned about it.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/21/us/ruth-bader-ginsburg-roe-v-wade.html

RBG should have retired.

Six religious extremists shouldn’t have lied in their confirmation hearings.

Three religious extremists shouldn’t have even had confirmation hearings. Thanks Bernie, for convincing people to stay home in 2020! Thanks for convincing everyone Dems are “just as bad”
Everyone who stayed home or voted independent in 2020 has blood on their hands

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Help me understand this better: C. Thomas said in his concurring statement that ""In future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court's substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell." Can anyone point to a list of which decisions that would be? He mentions three, but do Brown v. BOE and Loving v. Virginia fit the criteria?

Yes, all premised on the same theory. But Loving is interracial marriage, which includes Thomas, so that one was curiously omitted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Time for 24-7, indefinite, loud protests at the justice's houses. People following them everywhere in public wearing handmaid tale outfits. Public shunning. Not allowed to go anywhere in public in peace.

And then you have the audacity to call them cowards. You think they didn’t know what they were doing? They’d do it again even with your public shaming because it was the RIGHT thing to do.

If they think it was the right thing to do, then they shouldn't mind being dogged in public for the rest of their lives. And their spouses, too. 24/7, indefinitely.

They won’t. It’s still a vile thing to propose.

It is vile to propose that someone should be socially shunned but not vile to write a binding court ruling that says that a state has the right to stop an 11 year old pregnant with her dad's baby from ending her pregnancy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Help me understand this better: C. Thomas said in his concurring statement that ""In future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court's substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell." Can anyone point to a list of which decisions that would be? He mentions three, but do Brown v. BOE and Loving v. Virginia fit the criteria?

No because he is black and married to a white woman and those rulings serve him. He is self-serving and loathsome.

[Anonymous]

But obviously not inter-racial marriage. Clarence wants to keep that decision.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would like to thank President Trump for today!

Without trump,none of this happens. He deserves all of the credit in the world. Before he left office he made sure to have the right people in the SC. What a gift from God today. Thank you president Trump for not giving all of these sick murderers an easy out. Today, i feel proud to be an american and proud of our Supreme court!

...and yesterday Trump gave guns to actual sick murderers. Who are all to happy to shoot actual children in classrooms. But, praise be!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These justices should be denied service everywhere-restaurants, airplanes, kids activities.

+1
They should be made to feel unwelcome everywhere for the rest of their lives.

I'm on board with this. DC restaurant owners and stores should refuse service. Kids sports leagues-same. Gyms-same. Hotels, airlines.

[Anonymous]

Nothing vile about having to face the consequences of your life choices. Veing hounded in public for the rest of their lives seems like a reasonable and foreseeable result.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Help me understand this better: C. Thomas said in his concurring statement that ""In future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court's substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell." Can anyone point to a list of which decisions that would be? He mentions three, but do Brown v. BOE and Loving v. Virginia fit the criteria?

Yes, all premised on the same theory. But Loving is interracial marriage, which includes Thomas, so that one was curiously omitted.

This! Other rights should be eliminated, but not the one that allows his marriage?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These justices should be denied service everywhere-restaurants, airplanes, kids activities.

+1
They should be made to feel unwelcome everywhere for the rest of their lives.

I'm perfectly willing to return the favor if you want to play this way.

Oh wow another Republican who doesn’t like consequences. I’m caaaaaaaaanceling the lying religious extremists, waaaaaaaaaaah. A “duck your feelings” Republican is having a sad and needs to “return the favor.”

You belong to a minority religious extremist party. I cannot begin to describe to you how little most people think of hypocrites like you guys.

Actually, I support abortion legality in many cases, but people like you certainly make me question that support, and whether I should act on it in any way. Unfortunately left-wing extremists like yourself make reasonable compromise impossible. How about reading your screed and thinking a bit.

Lol, fool. The GOP just overturned Roe v Wade with their bought and paid for religious tribunal. You blew up the compromise. You voted for Republicans who supported six fascist sacks who lied in their confirmation hearing. You blew up the compromise. Women are going to die. You blew up the compromise. Poverty is going to skyrocket, as are medical bills for children who should never have been born. You blew up the compromise. I want you to feel every death, every suffering newborn child who is drowning in their own lungs because their poor little body is broken. You blew up the compromise.

[Anonymous]

I don't think anyone who has read Roe, and understands the Constitution, can possibly defend Roe on Constitutional grounds. It simply isn't possible. That's why pro-abortion constituencies need to stop trying to prop up the indefensible and move toward legislative solutions.

[Anonymous]

Thomas' opinion is really concerning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I predict very soon most college educated, professional women won’t even consider taking jobs in places like Texas and Florida. This will lead to a serious brain drain in red states.

Ha. You think there are any brains there now?

I wouldn't have moved there even 20 years ago.