DeSantis and FL moving to hammer Disney

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So sick of all this.
1. Disney should not be getting special tax treatment.
2. The law is quite reasonable. There is absolutely no reason to be discussing sex/sexuality with kids younger than third grade in school.

Correct.

Wildly incorrect

1. Disney does not get tax breaks, is the state’s biggest employer and invests way more in florida than it gets out. Many of us would never florida if not for Disney. Florida needs Disney way more than Disney needs florida.

2. The law has not passed and most likely won’t pass. Even if it does there will be legal challenges. The law is political theater to elevate DeSantis national profile before he runs for president.

[Anonymous]

I'm sure Disney won't have anything happen to them. Any Republican that actually believes that Disney is going to lose anything is absolutely naive. Nothing, literally nothing, is going to happen to them. How do I know? Because they can bombard the public to sway opinion and their political donations go to candidates of both political party's. Once the election is over, everyone is going to forget this ever happened. So stupid that people don't understand that this is a fake wedge issue. These fake issues come up every two years on even numbered years and people still don't see them when they get hit in the face with them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The courts won’t let this stand.


You know Disney got this deal in the 1960s and have the right to build a nuclear power plant if they want, right?

You know that a nuclear power plant has to be licensed by the NRC, right? Do you have any idea what that entails? Obviously not.

It’s an example of how long they have had exemptions and how broad they are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So sick of all this.
1. Disney should not be getting special tax treatment.
2. The law is quite reasonable. There is absolutely no reason to be discussing sex/sexuality with kids younger than third grade in school.

Correct.

Wildly incorrect

1. Disney does not get tax breaks, is the state’s biggest employer and invests way more in florida than it gets out. Many of us would never florida if not for Disney. Florida needs Disney way more than Disney needs florida.

2. The law has not passed and most likely won’t pass. Even if it does there will be legal challenges. The law is political theater to elevate DeSantis national profile before he runs for president.

The law passed.
However, this will be worse for the state than for Disney. Dumb move by DeSantis, but yes good short term political theater.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So sick of all this.
1. Disney should not be getting special tax treatment.
2. The law is quite reasonable. There is absolutely no reason to be discussing sex/sexuality with kids younger than third grade in school.

Correct.

Wildly incorrect

1. Disney does not get tax breaks, is the state’s biggest employer and invests way more in florida than it gets out. Many of us would never florida if not for Disney. Florida needs Disney way more than Disney needs florida.

2. The law has not passed and most likely won’t pass. Even if it does there will be legal challenges. The law is political theater to elevate DeSantis national profile before he runs for president.

The law passed.
However, this will be worse for the state than for Disney. Dumb move by DeSantis, but yes good short term political theater.

How are Republicans not embarrassed by this? Some political climber gets a law passed that will significantly harm his own constituents and not only do they not consider it a red flag for future office but instead they celebrate it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So sick of all this.
1. Disney should not be getting special tax treatment.
2. The law is quite reasonable. There is absolutely no reason to be discussing sex/sexuality with kids younger than third grade in school.

Correct.

Wildly incorrect

1. Disney does not get tax breaks, is the state’s biggest employer and invests way more in florida than it gets out. Many of us would never florida if not for Disney. Florida needs Disney way more than Disney needs florida.

2. The law has not passed and most likely won’t pass. Even if it does there will be legal challenges. The law is political theater to elevate DeSantis national profile before he runs for president.

The law passed.
However, this will be worse for the state than for Disney. Dumb move by DeSantis, but yes good short term political theater.

Sorry meant enacted rather passed …
Yes I agree though.

[Anonymous]

I think it's hilarious that a R is curtailing free speech by a private company and being business un-friendly.

+1000
Today's Republicans can't even remember what they're supposed to stand for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So sick of all this.
1. Disney should not be getting special tax treatment.
2. The law is quite reasonable. There is absolutely no reason to be discussing sex/sexuality with kids younger than third grade in school.

Correct.

Wildly incorrect

1. Disney does not get tax breaks, is the state’s biggest employer and invests way more in florida than it gets out. Many of us would never florida if not for Disney. Florida needs Disney way more than Disney needs florida.

2. The law has not passed and most likely won’t pass. Even if it does there will be legal challenges. The law is political theater to elevate DeSantis national profile before he runs for president.

The law passed.
However, this will be worse for the state than for Disney. Dumb move by DeSantis, but yes good short term political theater.

How are Republicans not embarrassed by this? Some political climber gets a law passed that will significantly harm his own constituents and not only do they not consider it a red flag for future office but instead they celebrate it?

There are no depths the modern GOP won't plumb if they think there's a chance it might own the libs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This should make everyone afraid, regardless of party affiliation. A company disagrees with a politician on a [insert description here] issue and within weeks has a 50+ year deal revoked. That doesn't scare the crap out of you people???

So now you are ok with big companies getting tax breaks? Everyone was all for taxing them before. Which is it? Companies need to pay their fair share, or the breaks are good?

Just stop it with the "tax breaks". There are no tax breaks. Disney pays more taxes to the state of Florida than any other entity in the state. They are biggest tax revenue for the state, bigger than any other part of the huge tourism industry.

And even if they were getting tax breaks, the law that was just past has nothing to do with taxes. It is about the creation and dissolution of special districts. In this case, a special district was created for the Walt Disney World land unit essentially setting it up like a local township or county. There are no tax breaks involved. Reedy Creek Improvement District allows Disney to manage the properties like a town, they have their own internal security (instead of police), they have fire and emergency services, they run a health clinic which is like a large Urgent Care facility and the medical services are administered by AdventHealth which is the group that maintains many of the hospitals in the greater Orlando region. They handle traffic, roadways, infrastructure, public transit, trash, utilities including water and sewage. Disney covers all of that without taxing any of the county residents or the <100 residents of the RDIC (Lake Buena Vista and Bay Lake communities).

Now, if RDIC is dissolved, the two counties, Orange and Osceola will then become responsible for providing all of those services to WDW. The counties are going to have to create a tax structure to tax the corporation for services, then they are going to have to create the infrastructure to start providing all of those services or take over the management of the facilities that WDW already owns and maintains. If they take over the existing facilities, they are going to have to come up with contracts to cover renting and leasing the facilities. And they are going to have to start providing services to the company immediately. Additionally, they are going to have the create the bureaucracy to administer and manage all of the above and permitting, inspection, review of all existing and future construction.

It's been estimated that it will cost about $2200-2800 per county resident in the two counties to cover the costs of assuming all of that infrastructure. Even if they start to tax WDW for the services, with the renting and leasing of Disney facilities, it is still going to cost the residents of the county a lot of money to provide all of the services. They will be lucky if they can create a tax structure that will halve the increased costs to the county residences for Disney. And they are going to need to create all of that and get things in place by summer 2023 (about 15-16 months) before the new law takes effect. These two counties are going to be destroyed and county residents are going to have to put up with a complete breakdown of county services as the country tries to get things under control in time.

As I posted above, this is not going to happen. Disney will be able to get legal injunctions to stop the enforcement of the new law. But if you think this is in any way good for the state, state residents, counties or county residents, you just don't have any idea what just happened. The only ones who will reap any gain from this are politicians who have fleeced their constituents into thinking this was good. Financially this is horrible for the state.

Why would Disney block this? Is it bad for Disney?

Yes. Disney makes decisions on how to handle all of the administration from a purely business/profit standpoint. They provide all those services and they do so at far higher standards that the local counties and state require. This way they give a better experience and continue to keep their standards high. If the administration reverted back to the counties, the counties would do things to cost rather than to the higher standards. The counties already cannot afford to provide services and would not be able to maintain the standards that Disney maintains. Quality would go way down and Disney would have a problem maintaining the experience that has made them the go-to vacation destination in the nation. Additionally, as a special district they can do things to a timetable that they set themselves. If control reverts back to the county, you would add huge layers of bureaucratic red tape to any type of development and infrastructure. Think of it this way. When Disney decides to make renovations to the parks or build new facilities, they get to set the timetable. If you want to add an addition to your house, how much control do you and your contractors have on the timetable? In most construction, the biggest limitations on time are applications, permits, inspections, etc. All government red tape designed to document everything that goes on. Right? Add those costs in and Disney deciding to open a new park or hotel or renovate features and suddenly instead of 2-5 years, it will be 8-10 years to get things done. It would be horrible for their business model if services were dropped to the most costly solutions and if they were forced to have to abide by local bureaucracy to get everything done. And they can't just throw money at a problem. Now, if things aren't moving fast enough, throw money at the problem and resolve issues right away and get back on schedule. Add in government bureaucracy and you're suddenly slowed to a snail's pace and everything is out of your hands and control.

The combination of loss of higher standards and worse, the time added for bureaucratic red tape would be horrific for Disney.

Time for Disney to start looking for a WDW 2.0.

I suggest Georgia.

I would suggest nowhere with a Republican majority.

I live in Florida and I feel like the Republicans here are the dogs who caught the car. What do they think is going to happen now? I have to assume there will be some sort of negotiated compromise that lets Rs tell everyone they've really stuck it to Disney - STUCK IT TO DISNEY - while still allowing Disney to operate as it is, more or less. It is just impossible - completely untenable - for Orange and Osceola Counties to take over the functions Disney is now providing for its own properties. It won't work. And as much as Rs suddenly hate Disney - I still can't believe I am writing those words - Disney is a massive employer, and a HUGE driver of tourism, and what in the actual :OIHNECF LUEH are they playing at here? Not enough to ban math books and punish trans kids anymore - now we're going to destroy tourism and big employers, too?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This should make everyone afraid, regardless of party affiliation. A company disagrees with a politician on a [insert description here] issue and within weeks has a 50+ year deal revoked. That doesn't scare the crap out of you people???

So now you are ok with big companies getting tax breaks? Everyone was all for taxing them before. Which is it? Companies need to pay their fair share, or the breaks are good?

Just stop it with the "tax breaks". There are no tax breaks. Disney pays more taxes to the state of Florida than any other entity in the state. They are biggest tax revenue for the state, bigger than any other part of the huge tourism industry.

And even if they were getting tax breaks, the law that was just past has nothing to do with taxes. It is about the creation and dissolution of special districts. In this case, a special district was created for the Walt Disney World land unit essentially setting it up like a local township or county. There are no tax breaks involved. Reedy Creek Improvement District allows Disney to manage the properties like a town, they have their own internal security (instead of police), they have fire and emergency services, they run a health clinic which is like a large Urgent Care facility and the medical services are administered by AdventHealth which is the group that maintains many of the hospitals in the greater Orlando region. They handle traffic, roadways, infrastructure, public transit, trash, utilities including water and sewage. Disney covers all of that without taxing any of the county residents or the <100 residents of the RDIC (Lake Buena Vista and Bay Lake communities).

Now, if RDIC is dissolved, the two counties, Orange and Osceola will then become responsible for providing all of those services to WDW. The counties are going to have to create a tax structure to tax the corporation for services, then they are going to have to create the infrastructure to start providing all of those services or take over the management of the facilities that WDW already owns and maintains. If they take over the existing facilities, they are going to have to come up with contracts to cover renting and leasing the facilities. And they are going to have to start providing services to the company immediately. Additionally, they are going to have the create the bureaucracy to administer and manage all of the above and permitting, inspection, review of all existing and future construction.

It's been estimated that it will cost about $2200-2800 per county resident in the two counties to cover the costs of assuming all of that infrastructure. Even if they start to tax WDW for the services, with the renting and leasing of Disney facilities, it is still going to cost the residents of the county a lot of money to provide all of the services. They will be lucky if they can create a tax structure that will halve the increased costs to the county residences for Disney. And they are going to need to create all of that and get things in place by summer 2023 (about 15-16 months) before the new law takes effect. These two counties are going to be destroyed and county residents are going to have to put up with a complete breakdown of county services as the country tries to get things under control in time.

As I posted above, this is not going to happen. Disney will be able to get legal injunctions to stop the enforcement of the new law. But if you think this is in any way good for the state, state residents, counties or county residents, you just don't have any idea what just happened. The only ones who will reap any gain from this are politicians who have fleeced their constituents into thinking this was good. Financially this is horrible for the state.

Why would Disney block this? Is it bad for Disney?

Yes. Disney makes decisions on how to handle all of the administration from a purely business/profit standpoint. They provide all those services and they do so at far higher standards that the local counties and state require. This way they give a better experience and continue to keep their standards high. If the administration reverted back to the counties, the counties would do things to cost rather than to the higher standards. The counties already cannot afford to provide services and would not be able to maintain the standards that Disney maintains. Quality would go way down and Disney would have a problem maintaining the experience that has made them the go-to vacation destination in the nation. Additionally, as a special district they can do things to a timetable that they set themselves. If control reverts back to the county, you would add huge layers of bureaucratic red tape to any type of development and infrastructure. Think of it this way. When Disney decides to make renovations to the parks or build new facilities, they get to set the timetable. If you want to add an addition to your house, how much control do you and your contractors have on the timetable? In most construction, the biggest limitations on time are applications, permits, inspections, etc. All government red tape designed to document everything that goes on. Right? Add those costs in and Disney deciding to open a new park or hotel or renovate features and suddenly instead of 2-5 years, it will be 8-10 years to get things done. It would be horrible for their business model if services were dropped to the most costly solutions and if they were forced to have to abide by local bureaucracy to get everything done. And they can't just throw money at a problem. Now, if things aren't moving fast enough, throw money at the problem and resolve issues right away and get back on schedule. Add in government bureaucracy and you're suddenly slowed to a snail's pace and everything is out of your hands and control.

The combination of loss of higher standards and worse, the time added for bureaucratic red tape would be horrific for Disney.

Time for Disney to start looking for a WDW 2.0.

I suggest Georgia.

I would suggest nowhere with a Republican majority.

I live in Florida and I feel like the Republicans here are the dogs who caught the car. What do they think is going to happen now? I have to assume there will be some sort of negotiated compromise that lets Rs tell everyone they've really stuck it to Disney - STUCK IT TO DISNEY - while still allowing Disney to operate as it is, more or less. It is just impossible - completely untenable - for Orange and Osceola Counties to take over the functions Disney is now providing for its own properties. It won't work. And as much as Rs suddenly hate Disney - I still can't believe I am writing those words - Disney is a massive employer, and a HUGE driver of tourism, and what in the actual :OIHNECF LUEH are they playing at here? Not enough to ban math books and punish trans kids anymore - now we're going to destroy tourism and big employers, too?

This is completely untrue. Disney can operate in the same manner as the other parks, many of which have special tax breaks and other benefits but not a complete district. Disney will be fine either way. It doesn’t need this district anymore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This should make everyone afraid, regardless of party affiliation. A company disagrees with a politician on a [insert description here] issue and within weeks has a 50+ year deal revoked. That doesn't scare the crap out of you people???

So now you are ok with big companies getting tax breaks? Everyone was all for taxing them before. Which is it? Companies need to pay their fair share, or the breaks are good?

Just stop it with the "tax breaks". There are no tax breaks. Disney pays more taxes to the state of Florida than any other entity in the state. They are biggest tax revenue for the state, bigger than any other part of the huge tourism industry.

And even if they were getting tax breaks, the law that was just past has nothing to do with taxes. It is about the creation and dissolution of special districts. In this case, a special district was created for the Walt Disney World land unit essentially setting it up like a local township or county. There are no tax breaks involved. Reedy Creek Improvement District allows Disney to manage the properties like a town, they have their own internal security (instead of police), they have fire and emergency services, they run a health clinic which is like a large Urgent Care facility and the medical services are administered by AdventHealth which is the group that maintains many of the hospitals in the greater Orlando region. They handle traffic, roadways, infrastructure, public transit, trash, utilities including water and sewage. Disney covers all of that without taxing any of the county residents or the <100 residents of the RDIC (Lake Buena Vista and Bay Lake communities).

Now, if RDIC is dissolved, the two counties, Orange and Osceola will then become responsible for providing all of those services to WDW. The counties are going to have to create a tax structure to tax the corporation for services, then they are going to have to create the infrastructure to start providing all of those services or take over the management of the facilities that WDW already owns and maintains. If they take over the existing facilities, they are going to have to come up with contracts to cover renting and leasing the facilities. And they are going to have to start providing services to the company immediately. Additionally, they are going to have the create the bureaucracy to administer and manage all of the above and permitting, inspection, review of all existing and future construction.

It's been estimated that it will cost about $2200-2800 per county resident in the two counties to cover the costs of assuming all of that infrastructure. Even if they start to tax WDW for the services, with the renting and leasing of Disney facilities, it is still going to cost the residents of the county a lot of money to provide all of the services. They will be lucky if they can create a tax structure that will halve the increased costs to the county residences for Disney. And they are going to need to create all of that and get things in place by summer 2023 (about 15-16 months) before the new law takes effect. These two counties are going to be destroyed and county residents are going to have to put up with a complete breakdown of county services as the country tries to get things under control in time.

As I posted above, this is not going to happen. Disney will be able to get legal injunctions to stop the enforcement of the new law. But if you think this is in any way good for the state, state residents, counties or county residents, you just don't have any idea what just happened. The only ones who will reap any gain from this are politicians who have fleeced their constituents into thinking this was good. Financially this is horrible for the state.

Why would Disney block this? Is it bad for Disney?

Yes. Disney makes decisions on how to handle all of the administration from a purely business/profit standpoint. They provide all those services and they do so at far higher standards that the local counties and state require. This way they give a better experience and continue to keep their standards high. If the administration reverted back to the counties, the counties would do things to cost rather than to the higher standards. The counties already cannot afford to provide services and would not be able to maintain the standards that Disney maintains. Quality would go way down and Disney would have a problem maintaining the experience that has made them the go-to vacation destination in the nation. Additionally, as a special district they can do things to a timetable that they set themselves. If control reverts back to the county, you would add huge layers of bureaucratic red tape to any type of development and infrastructure. Think of it this way. When Disney decides to make renovations to the parks or build new facilities, they get to set the timetable. If you want to add an addition to your house, how much control do you and your contractors have on the timetable? In most construction, the biggest limitations on time are applications, permits, inspections, etc. All government red tape designed to document everything that goes on. Right? Add those costs in and Disney deciding to open a new park or hotel or renovate features and suddenly instead of 2-5 years, it will be 8-10 years to get things done. It would be horrible for their business model if services were dropped to the most costly solutions and if they were forced to have to abide by local bureaucracy to get everything done. And they can't just throw money at a problem. Now, if things aren't moving fast enough, throw money at the problem and resolve issues right away and get back on schedule. Add in government bureaucracy and you're suddenly slowed to a snail's pace and everything is out of your hands and control.

The combination of loss of higher standards and worse, the time added for bureaucratic red tape would be horrific for Disney.

Time for Disney to start looking for a WDW 2.0.

I suggest Georgia.

I would suggest nowhere with a Republican majority.

I live in Florida and I feel like the Republicans here are the dogs who caught the car. What do they think is going to happen now? I have to assume there will be some sort of negotiated compromise that lets Rs tell everyone they've really stuck it to Disney - STUCK IT TO DISNEY - while still allowing Disney to operate as it is, more or less. It is just impossible - completely untenable - for Orange and Osceola Counties to take over the functions Disney is now providing for its own properties. It won't work. And as much as Rs suddenly hate Disney - I still can't believe I am writing those words - Disney is a massive employer, and a HUGE driver of tourism, and what in the actual :OIHNECF LUEH are they playing at here? Not enough to ban math books and punish trans kids anymore - now we're going to destroy tourism and big employers, too?

This is completely untrue. Disney can operate in the same manner as the other parks, many of which have special tax breaks and other benefits but not a complete district. Disney will be fine either way. It doesn’t need this district anymore.

No, they can't operate in the same manner as the other parks - and they certainly can't operate as they have.

I just cannot with you gd idiots. You are so stupid, so short-sighted, so ignorant and determined to burn down everything the second your newest Dear Leader says to light the match.

[Anonymous]

So early analysis shows property taxes will increase in central Florida by 25% plus the cost of the billion plus bonds. Central Florida usually decides Florida.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So early analysis shows property taxes will increase in central Florida by 25% plus the cost of the billion plus bonds. Central Florida usually decides Florida.

I’m moving there in a couple of months, and looking forward to voting against DeSantis.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This should make everyone afraid, regardless of party affiliation. A company disagrees with a politician on a [insert description here] issue and within weeks has a 50+ year deal revoked. That doesn't scare the crap out of you people???

So now you are ok with big companies getting tax breaks? Everyone was all for taxing them before. Which is it? Companies need to pay their fair share, or the breaks are good?

Just stop it with the "tax breaks". There are no tax breaks. Disney pays more taxes to the state of Florida than any other entity in the state. They are biggest tax revenue for the state, bigger than any other part of the huge tourism industry.

And even if they were getting tax breaks, the law that was just past has nothing to do with taxes. It is about the creation and dissolution of special districts. In this case, a special district was created for the Walt Disney World land unit essentially setting it up like a local township or county. There are no tax breaks involved. Reedy Creek Improvement District allows Disney to manage the properties like a town, they have their own internal security (instead of police), they have fire and emergency services, they run a health clinic which is like a large Urgent Care facility and the medical services are administered by AdventHealth which is the group that maintains many of the hospitals in the greater Orlando region. They handle traffic, roadways, infrastructure, public transit, trash, utilities including water and sewage. Disney covers all of that without taxing any of the county residents or the <100 residents of the RDIC (Lake Buena Vista and Bay Lake communities).

Now, if RDIC is dissolved, the two counties, Orange and Osceola will then become responsible for providing all of those services to WDW. The counties are going to have to create a tax structure to tax the corporation for services, then they are going to have to create the infrastructure to start providing all of those services or take over the management of the facilities that WDW already owns and maintains. If they take over the existing facilities, they are going to have to come up with contracts to cover renting and leasing the facilities. And they are going to have to start providing services to the company immediately. Additionally, they are going to have the create the bureaucracy to administer and manage all of the above and permitting, inspection, review of all existing and future construction.

It's been estimated that it will cost about $2200-2800 per county resident in the two counties to cover the costs of assuming all of that infrastructure. Even if they start to tax WDW for the services, with the renting and leasing of Disney facilities, it is still going to cost the residents of the county a lot of money to provide all of the services. They will be lucky if they can create a tax structure that will halve the increased costs to the county residences for Disney. And they are going to need to create all of that and get things in place by summer 2023 (about 15-16 months) before the new law takes effect. These two counties are going to be destroyed and county residents are going to have to put up with a complete breakdown of county services as the country tries to get things under control in time.

As I posted above, this is not going to happen. Disney will be able to get legal injunctions to stop the enforcement of the new law. But if you think this is in any way good for the state, state residents, counties or county residents, you just don't have any idea what just happened. The only ones who will reap any gain from this are politicians who have fleeced their constituents into thinking this was good. Financially this is horrible for the state.

Why would Disney block this? Is it bad for Disney?

Yes. Disney makes decisions on how to handle all of the administration from a purely business/profit standpoint. They provide all those services and they do so at far higher standards that the local counties and state require. This way they give a better experience and continue to keep their standards high. If the administration reverted back to the counties, the counties would do things to cost rather than to the higher standards. The counties already cannot afford to provide services and would not be able to maintain the standards that Disney maintains. Quality would go way down and Disney would have a problem maintaining the experience that has made them the go-to vacation destination in the nation. Additionally, as a special district they can do things to a timetable that they set themselves. If control reverts back to the county, you would add huge layers of bureaucratic red tape to any type of development and infrastructure. Think of it this way. When Disney decides to make renovations to the parks or build new facilities, they get to set the timetable. If you want to add an addition to your house, how much control do you and your contractors have on the timetable? In most construction, the biggest limitations on time are applications, permits, inspections, etc. All government red tape designed to document everything that goes on. Right? Add those costs in and Disney deciding to open a new park or hotel or renovate features and suddenly instead of 2-5 years, it will be 8-10 years to get things done. It would be horrible for their business model if services were dropped to the most costly solutions and if they were forced to have to abide by local bureaucracy to get everything done. And they can't just throw money at a problem. Now, if things aren't moving fast enough, throw money at the problem and resolve issues right away and get back on schedule. Add in government bureaucracy and you're suddenly slowed to a snail's pace and everything is out of your hands and control.

The combination of loss of higher standards and worse, the time added for bureaucratic red tape would be horrific for Disney.

Time for Disney to start looking for a WDW 2.0.

I suggest Georgia.

I would suggest nowhere with a Republican majority.

I live in Florida and I feel like the Republicans here are the dogs who caught the car. What do they think is going to happen now? I have to assume there will be some sort of negotiated compromise that lets Rs tell everyone they've really stuck it to Disney - STUCK IT TO DISNEY - while still allowing Disney to operate as it is, more or less. It is just impossible - completely untenable - for Orange and Osceola Counties to take over the functions Disney is now providing for its own properties. It won't work. And as much as Rs suddenly hate Disney - I still can't believe I am writing those words - Disney is a massive employer, and a HUGE driver of tourism, and what in the actual :OIHNECF LUEH are they playing at here? Not enough to ban math books and punish trans kids anymore - now we're going to destroy tourism and big employers, too?

This is completely untrue. Disney can operate in the same manner as the other parks, many of which have special tax breaks and other benefits but not a complete district. Disney will be fine either way. It doesn’t need this district anymore.

No, they can't operate in the same manner as the other parks - and they certainly can't operate as they have.

I just cannot with you gd idiots. You are so stupid, so short-sighted, so ignorant and determined to burn down everything the second your newest Dear Leader says to light the match.

I don’t care what happens in Florida. But Disney absolutely can operate just fine without their special district. Disney World will be fine no matter the outcome.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This should make everyone afraid, regardless of party affiliation. A company disagrees with a politician on a [insert description here] issue and within weeks has a 50+ year deal revoked. That doesn't scare the crap out of you people???

So now you are ok with big companies getting tax breaks? Everyone was all for taxing them before. Which is it? Companies need to pay their fair share, or the breaks are good?

Just stop it with the "tax breaks". There are no tax breaks. Disney pays more taxes to the state of Florida than any other entity in the state. They are biggest tax revenue for the state, bigger than any other part of the huge tourism industry.

And even if they were getting tax breaks, the law that was just past has nothing to do with taxes. It is about the creation and dissolution of special districts. In this case, a special district was created for the Walt Disney World land unit essentially setting it up like a local township or county. There are no tax breaks involved. Reedy Creek Improvement District allows Disney to manage the properties like a town, they have their own internal security (instead of police), they have fire and emergency services, they run a health clinic which is like a large Urgent Care facility and the medical services are administered by AdventHealth which is the group that maintains many of the hospitals in the greater Orlando region. They handle traffic, roadways, infrastructure, public transit, trash, utilities including water and sewage. Disney covers all of that without taxing any of the county residents or the <100 residents of the RDIC (Lake Buena Vista and Bay Lake communities).

Now, if RDIC is dissolved, the two counties, Orange and Osceola will then become responsible for providing all of those services to WDW. The counties are going to have to create a tax structure to tax the corporation for services, then they are going to have to create the infrastructure to start providing all of those services or take over the management of the facilities that WDW already owns and maintains. If they take over the existing facilities, they are going to have to come up with contracts to cover renting and leasing the facilities. And they are going to have to start providing services to the company immediately. Additionally, they are going to have the create the bureaucracy to administer and manage all of the above and permitting, inspection, review of all existing and future construction.

It's been estimated that it will cost about $2200-2800 per county resident in the two counties to cover the costs of assuming all of that infrastructure. Even if they start to tax WDW for the services, with the renting and leasing of Disney facilities, it is still going to cost the residents of the county a lot of money to provide all of the services. They will be lucky if they can create a tax structure that will halve the increased costs to the county residences for Disney. And they are going to need to create all of that and get things in place by summer 2023 (about 15-16 months) before the new law takes effect. These two counties are going to be destroyed and county residents are going to have to put up with a complete breakdown of county services as the country tries to get things under control in time.

As I posted above, this is not going to happen. Disney will be able to get legal injunctions to stop the enforcement of the new law. But if you think this is in any way good for the state, state residents, counties or county residents, you just don't have any idea what just happened. The only ones who will reap any gain from this are politicians who have fleeced their constituents into thinking this was good. Financially this is horrible for the state.

Why would Disney block this? Is it bad for Disney?

Yes. Disney makes decisions on how to handle all of the administration from a purely business/profit standpoint. They provide all those services and they do so at far higher standards that the local counties and state require. This way they give a better experience and continue to keep their standards high. If the administration reverted back to the counties, the counties would do things to cost rather than to the higher standards. The counties already cannot afford to provide services and would not be able to maintain the standards that Disney maintains. Quality would go way down and Disney would have a problem maintaining the experience that has made them the go-to vacation destination in the nation. Additionally, as a special district they can do things to a timetable that they set themselves. If control reverts back to the county, you would add huge layers of bureaucratic red tape to any type of development and infrastructure. Think of it this way. When Disney decides to make renovations to the parks or build new facilities, they get to set the timetable. If you want to add an addition to your house, how much control do you and your contractors have on the timetable? In most construction, the biggest limitations on time are applications, permits, inspections, etc. All government red tape designed to document everything that goes on. Right? Add those costs in and Disney deciding to open a new park or hotel or renovate features and suddenly instead of 2-5 years, it will be 8-10 years to get things done. It would be horrible for their business model if services were dropped to the most costly solutions and if they were forced to have to abide by local bureaucracy to get everything done. And they can't just throw money at a problem. Now, if things aren't moving fast enough, throw money at the problem and resolve issues right away and get back on schedule. Add in government bureaucracy and you're suddenly slowed to a snail's pace and everything is out of your hands and control.

The combination of loss of higher standards and worse, the time added for bureaucratic red tape would be horrific for Disney.

Time for Disney to start looking for a WDW 2.0.

I suggest Georgia.

I would suggest nowhere with a Republican majority.

I live in Florida and I feel like the Republicans here are the dogs who caught the car. What do they think is going to happen now? I have to assume there will be some sort of negotiated compromise that lets Rs tell everyone they've really stuck it to Disney - STUCK IT TO DISNEY - while still allowing Disney to operate as it is, more or less. It is just impossible - completely untenable - for Orange and Osceola Counties to take over the functions Disney is now providing for its own properties. It won't work. And as much as Rs suddenly hate Disney - I still can't believe I am writing those words - Disney is a massive employer, and a HUGE driver of tourism, and what in the actual :OIHNECF LUEH are they playing at here? Not enough to ban math books and punish trans kids anymore - now we're going to destroy tourism and big employers, too?

This is completely untrue. Disney can operate in the same manner as the other parks, many of which have special tax breaks and other benefits but not a complete district. Disney will be fine either way. It doesn’t need this district anymore.

No, they can't operate in the same manner as the other parks - and they certainly can't operate as they have.

I just cannot with you gd idiots. You are so stupid, so short-sighted, so ignorant and determined to burn down everything the second your newest Dear Leader says to light the match.

I don’t care what happens in Florida. But Disney absolutely can operate just fine without their special district. Disney World will be fine no matter the outcome.

DP. I don't think you understand how much Disney relies upon Reedy Creek to operate the way it does. Did you know that the Disney monorail is actually Reedy Creek public transit system? If Reedy Creek disappears, it will be controlled by the localities that take over the former district, and Disney will lose control over its operation. They will no longer be able to staff it with Disney employees and dictate the standards of conduct for employees, it will be all local government employees. Maintenance is a major factor here for the Disney experience. A big part of why service disruptions on the monorail system are so infrequent and brief is that Disney has mechanics and other maintenance workers on site around the clock to do maintenance on the system every night and then immediately respond to any issues that may come up during the day. No other level of government in the U.S. puts a comparable level of resources into maintenance of their mass transit systems to Disney.

Are you going to pay premium Disney prices to stay at a Disney resort and buy tickets to Disney parks if the monorail system functions the way the DC Metro does, constant breakdowns, shutting down entire lines for maintenance for weeks at a time, running limited trains so you might have to wait 20 minutes or more for one to arrive, and service delays that could last hours until can get a maintenance crew there? Of course not. And the same goes for the Skyliner, which would kill the Disney resorts relying on that for easy park access.