The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

That is a glow-up but not (yet) full MAGA Barbie.

Maybe she's taking it slow instead of going full MAGA makeover all at once.

[Anonymous]

I think she's just losing weight and getting professional help with hair/makeup. Not that I'm an expert on spotting procedures.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

That is a glow-up but not (yet) full MAGA Barbie.

+1 I think side parts are still frowned upon although admittedly there hasn’t been an executive order against them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

That is a glow-up but not (yet) full MAGA Barbie.

+1 I think side parts are still frowned upon although admittedly there hasn’t been an executive order against them.

Side parts are often more flattering, and it's sad to me that so many women give in to the middle part trend.

[Anonymous]

“On Tuesday, a listing surfaced on eBay purportedly offering Melania Trump’s wedding dress for sale. You know, the one designed by John Galliano for Dior couture, reportedly costing more than $100,000, worn by the first lady at her Mar-a-Lago wedding to Donald J. Trump and featured on her only Vogue cover, in February 2005.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/26/style/melania-trump-wedding-dress-ebay.html?unlocked_article_code=1.7U4.6Opr.VQGrs6OGqgrR&smid=url-share

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

That is a glow-up but not (yet) full MAGA Barbie.

+1 I think side parts are still frowned upon although admittedly there hasn’t been an executive order against them.

Side parts are often more flattering, and it's sad to me that so many women give in to the middle part trend.

I had a widow's peak when I was young and wore my hair long, straight, parted in the middle like everyone else around me until I realized that with a low forehead, eyes too close together, and a wide face it was a bad idea. Went to a side part and never looked back.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks at least 40 in today's Washington Post Love Story to her:



But of the MAGA loving WaPo says: "Trump’s newest press secretary is radiant, blond and apple-cheeked — as if one of Leonardo da Vinci’s Madonnas had been styled for a Fox News hit." Gag. Barf.

Also why is her face so FLAT? No, not fat, F-L-A-T?



She forgot to do the back of her hair below, LOL!


And below, she was like 24 years old and dressed AGAIN like a 55 year old. Ewwww. This was well before she had her baby, no excuses.

No woman’s butt has ever looked good in tan pants.

But - and it is shocking that I’m about to compliment KL - I give her credit for no lines or bulges under those.

Zero credit. Wrinkles and seamless dimples.

^seam dimples. Whatever those divots are where the material is not shaped to lie flat.

You mean darts?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

That is a glow-up but not (yet) full MAGA Barbie.

+1 I think side parts are still frowned upon although admittedly there hasn’t been an executive order against them.

Side parts are often more flattering, and it's sad to me that so many women give in to the middle part trend.

I had a widow's peak when I was young and wore my hair long, straight, parted in the middle like everyone else around me until I realized that with a low forehead, eyes too close together, and a wide face it was a bad idea. Went to a side part and never looked back.

I have a natural middle part. Several people over the years have been like, "It's such a beautiful natural middle part, you can really pull it off" but I was firmly in the side part camp. I just recently started parting it in the middle again and now of course after years of training to part to the right it won't stay. Sigh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

That is a glow-up but not (yet) full MAGA Barbie.

+1 I think side parts are still frowned upon although admittedly there hasn’t been an executive order against them.

Side parts are often more flattering, and it's sad to me that so many women give in to the middle part trend.

Yasssss

[Anonymous]

This pic is too far away to really see, but I'm not sure how to post the video I saw. Anyway. Usha went to Greenland in a sweater that was absolutely covered in pills and lint.



It's truly amazing how slovenly she can be.

[Anonymous]

That can't be pilling - it has to be a boucle-type sweater. You can see the photo larger here
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/vice-president-jd-and-second-lady-usha-vance-eat-a-meal-news-photo/2206673988?adppopup=true

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That can't be pilling - it has to be a boucle-type sweater. You can see the photo larger here
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/vice-president-jd-and-second-lady-usha-vance-eat-a-meal-news-photo/2206673988?adppopup=true

I looked at the larger photo and zoomed in.

It is pilling, and it looks even worse up close.

It’s really, really bad.

[Anonymous]

Usha aside, this is among the worst coat looks I have seen on a man. I am appalled.

[img] https://images.axios.com/giT48P5fXuwS9k5NHDgYr7DzgTk=/0x371:5528x3480/1920x1080/2025/03/28/1743195430721.jpg?w=1200

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kristi wore a $60k watch to visit the prison. https://nypost.com/2025/03/27/us-news/kristi-noem-appears-to-wear-60k-rolex-at-el-salvadors-cecot-prison/

How TF can she afford a $60,000 watch? She made only a little more than twice that per year as the SD Governor and makes $250K now.

She sold her mouth to that Texas Dentist for $60K.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That can't be pilling - it has to be a boucle-type sweater. You can see the photo larger here
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/vice-president-jd-and-second-lady-usha-vance-eat-a-meal-news-photo/2206673988?adppopup=true

I looked at the larger photo and zoomed in.

It is pilling, and it looks even worse up close.

It’s really, really bad.

It's horrible. I don't know who told her that she looks good in camel, but they lied. I have her coloring, camel/beige is awful.