Forum Index
»
Soccer
It sounds like they are pissed off that a decision is going to be made without their input. I’m sure some of them do not want to change because it’s going to be a real headache to form completely new teams. |
Shutup, seriously. You have no idea what SOCAL thinks about BY v SY or what it's member clubs are thinking. We get that your daughter was born between Aug 1 and Dec 31 and you're drooling ar the possibility of playing down. |
What an angry Q1/Q2 parent! I hope your daughter is only able to play socal, so she is still have a chance that Socal will stay BY 25/26. ECNL will change regardless. |
It would technically be playing their age group. Not playing down. It’s against the rules to play down unless you have someone to get you a special birth certificate. |
What are you even talking about? In Socal SOCAL League is the 3rd tier of player behind ECNL and ECRL and GA and DPL. Nobody is worried about making it onto a SOCAL team. If ECNL wants to change by themselves fine. But it won't be as easy as you think it will be. |
As I said, this proposal must have been discussed and negotiated among all interested parties many months ago. Those Docs are not only aware of it like us today. If they can give feedback, they already did so a long time ago and are part of the negotiation. Also, the decision is not decided at the voting moment. Those people in power have already reached an agreement long before that. |
Nope, many coaches and DOCs are just starting to get involved and provide input now. |
Yes DOCs are typically not involved in league decisions. That is why they have board members they vote for the masses. |
If they only get "involved" now, they are not part of the decision-making group. This kind of critical business change decision is only controlled by a small group. |
If this email is legit, that means that these discussions have NOT been on going, but this looks more like a blitzkrieg push to force the issue for a change. |
I know more than a few ECNL DOCs and TDs that were totally unaware of this debate back in July/August when rumors started swirling. |
Depends on the org. Many orgs these proposals would have percolated through committees before the board got involved. If it was board driven, a real indictment on ECNL. It paints a picture of a soccer org that bends to the whim of one board member who has a trapped kid that happens to have struggled over the past 2 years. |
Depends on how you define a discussion. Discussion have been going on but not any that involve your typical doc at the club level only at the league admin level. I think the purpose of the email was because there was push back from some directors who had no idea anything was changing most doc do not get involved with soccer politics and only worry about their clubs and their own bottom line. This news was definitely a wake up call for some who are probably panicking because they are worried about their clubs losing money. |
Bingo |
And you are forgetting that they have paying customers with real concerns |