Kane from Kaneshow divorcing and crying on air right now (Part 3)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How do I find Natasha's Facebook page?

Natasha Elisa

[Anonymous]

I think all the speculating about how Danni and Natasha are funding themselves is ridiculous and judgmental. It is no one's business how they take care of their kids and pay their bills.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think all the speculating about how Danni and Natasha are funding themselves is ridiculous and judgmental. It is no one's business how they take care of their kids and pay their bills.

+1000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stop hating on Natasha. She doesn't need to get a job. She has two little girls and one of them is in school full time, the little one is half day. Kane makes enough money to support her without her having to. There is nothing wrong with being a Sahm. When both girls are in Scholls full time and they are older she probably will get a job. She's not stupid, she actually very smart. Just keep in mind, kane's money is her money too...he couldn't do all those additional gigs without her being home with their children. When she's ready to post her blog, she will!

I don't personally care about Natasha one way or the other, but I never understand why if a couple decide that they want their kids to have a SAHP while they're married, that the decision would suddenly be different if they divorce. In a situation where there's not enough income to support two households after a divorce, then obviously the SAHP needs to get a job, but that's probably not Natasha and Peter's situation.

Are you serious? Because once the decision is made to divorce, it shouldn't be up to the working parent to continue to support the non-working parent's lifestyle, they are not a married couple anymore. I understand while children are still young, but once they are older and both in school full time, there shouldn't be any reason why the non-working parent cannot go out and get at least a part-time job. What happens when the working parent wants to remarry but has to continue paying giant alimony checks to the non-working parent that doesn't want to support themselves? How would that be fair?

How would it be FAIR? Omg are you for real? They made a Decision for her to stay home. Period. That's her job. If he gets remarried that doesn't undo his first family

They made that decision WHEN THEY WERE MARRIED. They also vowed "for better or for worse", so are you holding them to that as well? Are you delusional that you actually think that in the event of a divorce that the other parent isn't supposed to step up a little bit? And you're right, getting remarried doesn't undo his first family, DIVORCE is actually the definition of undoing. It's undoing a marriage. Yes, he is still responsible for the care of their girls, but there are a lot of decisions that don't necessarily apply after divorce happens.

And besides that, how demeaning is it anyway that as long as she is jobless and dependent on Kane for money, he can hold that over her head? I mean, nothing screams "independence" like needing an allowance from your ex-husband to pay for everything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stop hating on Natasha. She doesn't need to get a job. She has two little girls and one of them is in school full time, the little one is half day. Kane makes enough money to support her without her having to. There is nothing wrong with being a Sahm. When both girls are in Scholls full time and they are older she probably will get a job. She's not stupid, she actually very smart. Just keep in mind, kane's money is her money too...he couldn't do all those additional gigs without her being home with their children. When she's ready to post her blog, she will!

I don't personally care about Natasha one way or the other, but I never understand why if a couple decide that they want their kids to have a SAHP while they're married, that the decision would suddenly be different if they divorce. In a situation where there's not enough income to support two households after a divorce, then obviously the SAHP needs to get a job, but that's probably not Natasha and Peter's situation.

Are you serious? Because once the decision is made to divorce, it shouldn't be up to the working parent to continue to support the non-working parent's lifestyle, they are not a married couple anymore. I understand while children are still young, but once they are older and both in school full time, there shouldn't be any reason why the non-working parent cannot go out and get at least a part-time job. What happens when the working parent wants to remarry but has to continue paying giant alimony checks to the non-working parent that doesn't want to support themselves? How would that be fair?

How would it be FAIR? Omg are you for real? They made a Decision for her to stay home. Period. That's her job. If he gets remarried that doesn't undo his first family

They made that decision WHEN THEY WERE MARRIED. They also vowed "for better or for worse", so are you holding them to that as well? Are you delusional that you actually think that in the event of a divorce that the other parent isn't supposed to step up a little bit? And you're right, getting remarried doesn't undo his first family, DIVORCE is actually the definition of undoing. It's undoing a marriage. Yes, he is still responsible for the care of their girls, but there are a lot of decisions that don't necessarily apply after divorce happens.

And besides that, how demeaning is it anyway that as long as she is jobless and dependent on Kane for money, he can hold that over her head? I mean, nothing screams "independence" like needing an allowance from your ex-husband to pay for everything.

One other thing. Would you have this same opinion if the roles were reversed, and Natasha was the one in radio making the money and Kane was the one staying home? Or would you be saying that Kane needs to "man up" and provide for his family? I'm just curious.

[Anonymous]

Do you not have anything better to do with you own life then worry about Natasha? Natasha is smart, has a college degree so I'm sure she will be just fine if and when she decides to get a career.

[Anonymous]

I saw balloons outside of the men's warehouse...you know what that means ;0)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stop hating on Natasha. She doesn't need to get a job. She has two little girls and one of them is in school full time, the little one is half day. Kane makes enough money to support her without her having to. There is nothing wrong with being a Sahm. When both girls are in Scholls full time and they are older she probably will get a job. She's not stupid, she actually very smart. Just keep in mind, kane's money is her money too...he couldn't do all those additional gigs without her being home with their children. When she's ready to post her blog, she will!

I don't personally care about Natasha one way or the other, but I never understand why if a couple decide that they want their kids to have a SAHP while they're married, that the decision would suddenly be different if they divorce. In a situation where there's not enough income to support two households after a divorce, then obviously the SAHP needs to get a job, but that's probably not Natasha and Peter's situation.

Are you serious? Because once the decision is made to divorce, it shouldn't be up to the working parent to continue to support the non-working parent's lifestyle, they are not a married couple anymore. I understand while children are still young, but once they are older and both in school full time, there shouldn't be any reason why the non-working parent cannot go out and get at least a part-time job. What happens when the working parent wants to remarry but has to continue paying giant alimony checks to the non-working parent that doesn't want to support themselves? How would that be fair?

How would it be FAIR? Omg are you for real? They made a Decision for her to stay home. Period. That's her job. If he gets remarried that doesn't undo his first family

They made that decision WHEN THEY WERE MARRIED. They also vowed "for better or for worse", so are you holding them to that as well? Are you delusional that you actually think that in the event of a divorce that the other parent isn't supposed to step up a little bit? And you're right, getting remarried doesn't undo his first family, DIVORCE is actually the definition of undoing. It's undoing a marriage. Yes, he is still responsible for the care of their girls, but there are a lot of decisions that don't necessarily apply after divorce happens.

And besides that, how demeaning is it anyway that as long as she is jobless and dependent on Kane for money, he can hold that over her head? I mean, nothing screams "independence" like needing an allowance from your ex-husband to pay for everything.

One other thing. Would you have this same opinion if the roles were reversed, and Natasha was the one in radio making the money and Kane was the one staying home? Or would you be saying that Kane needs to "man up" and provide for his family? I'm just curious.

actually I would have the exact same stance. And I'm not saying she shouldn't get a job for a number of reasons but people attacking her as lazy? Umm no. She's been out of the workforce for what, 6 years now? Not to mention she's not in the best of health and that she's probably been trying to keep things as normal as possible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stop hating on Natasha. She doesn't need to get a job. She has two little girls and one of them is in school full time, the little one is half day. Kane makes enough money to support her without her having to. There is nothing wrong with being a Sahm. When both girls are in Scholls full time and they are older she probably will get a job. She's not stupid, she actually very smart. Just keep in mind, kane's money is her money too...he couldn't do all those additional gigs without her being home with their children. When she's ready to post her blog, she will!

I don't personally care about Natasha one way or the other, but I never understand why if a couple decide that they want their kids to have a SAHP while they're married, that the decision would suddenly be different if they divorce. In a situation where there's not enough income to support two households after a divorce, then obviously the SAHP needs to get a job, but that's probably not Natasha and Peter's situation.

Are you serious? Because once the decision is made to divorce, it shouldn't be up to the working parent to continue to support the non-working parent's lifestyle, they are not a married couple anymore. I understand while children are still young, but once they are older and both in school full time, there shouldn't be any reason why the non-working parent cannot go out and get at least a part-time job. What happens when the working parent wants to remarry but has to continue paying giant alimony checks to the non-working parent that doesn't want to support themselves? How would that be fair?

How would it be FAIR? Omg are you for real? They made a Decision for her to stay home. Period. That's her job. If he gets remarried that doesn't undo his first family

They made that decision WHEN THEY WERE MARRIED. They also vowed "for better or for worse", so are you holding them to that as well? Are you delusional that you actually think that in the event of a divorce that the other parent isn't supposed to step up a little bit? And you're right, getting remarried doesn't undo his first family, DIVORCE is actually the definition of undoing. It's undoing a marriage. Yes, he is still responsible for the care of their girls, but there are a lot of decisions that don't necessarily apply after divorce happens.

And besides that, how demeaning is it anyway that as long as she is jobless and dependent on Kane for money, he can hold that over her head? I mean, nothing screams "independence" like needing an allowance from your ex-husband to pay for everything.

One other thing. Would you have this same opinion if the roles were reversed, and Natasha was the one in radio making the money and Kane was the one staying home? Or would you be saying that Kane needs to "man up" and provide for his family? I'm just curious.

actually I would have the exact same stance. And I'm not saying she shouldn't get a job for a number of reasons but people attacking her as lazy? Umm no. She's been out of the workforce for what, 6 years now? Not to mention she's not in the best of health and that she's probably been trying to keep things as normal as possible.

I never said Natasha was lazy. What I disagreed with is the insinuation that she should live the rest of her life with her paycheck coming from Kane, and the thought that nothing changes when divorce occurs. I will never say that a SAHP is lazy, my sister is a SAHM and I admire her for that. But I know the last thing she would want if, god forbid, her and my BIL ever got divorced, is to rely on him for her well-being, especially if he treated her the way that Natasha says Kane treats her. That's all I'm saying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Natasha is smart. She has a degree in marketing or business, I can't remember. She had a career before she decided to become a sahm.

Not being snarky, but what was her job/career?

I think she worked in radio. I'm sure there are lots of jobs she could have. Even a part time job would show her contributing in some way....

I am pretty sure that she worked in a salon in MD before they had kids. Way back in thread 1, there is a link to her radio bio page from a station in Florida, where she was either an intern or a new hire. A couple of miscellaneous jobs isn't a "career," and it would appear she has no discernible skill to enter the workforce.

[Anonymous]

Danni's IG post:

iamdannistarr Today would have been my 5 year wedding anniversary. The union is over, but I'm grateful for the experience because it made me who I am...mostly though I'm blessed that these two beautiful humans were a product of love and because we will do right by them, a mutual respect for each other will be maintained. So blessed to call these girls mine, to be their momma is my greatest achievement #munchieandsmooch

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Do you not have anything better to do with you own life then worry about Natasha? Natasha is smart, has a college degree so I'm sure she will be just fine if and when she decides to get a career.

Hi Natasha's friend.

[Anonymous]

heard a rumor that bobby bones will be joining the program?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:heard a rumor that bobby bones will be joining the program?

Riiiiight..he's gonna leave his own show to join this sinking ship?

[Anonymous]

How old are the people on here? Im tired of people accussing other ppl who dares enough to go against the hateful posts on here as danni,kane,natasha,bfc,rose. Come on mean girls on here, smart ppl who knows better on this site will always disagree. And yes go ahead "this is danni posting"