Kate's New Picture

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Pretty weird the only produced one version of this yesterday. If it was paparazzi, wouldn’t they have multiple shots? [/quote


It wasn’t live


This is so damning. They should just stop releasing pictures instead of more doctored ones. The palace keeps digging the hole deeper. At this point I honestly wonder if they’re trying to get the press to detract from Charles


It does seem to be deliberate. Not sure why. Maybe it will become clear in time.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Can you guys posting X links pretty please give a quick summary for those of us unable to access at work?


I'm thankful to the royal family for making Twitter great again
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Can you guys posting X links pretty please give a quick summary for those of us unable to access at work?


Nypost is reporting mental health issues. Eventually US outlets will break the story because a British Courts' gag order is worthless in a state with press shield laws
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It was a colossal PR mistake to not provide more details about Kate’s surgery and health issues. It is completely understandable that she would want privacy but this is all far worse IMHO (and that information will come out eventually anyway). Even if they had simply said “surgery due to complications from Crohn’s disease etc etc, is non life threatening blah blah”. The whole thing was mismanaged from the start.


To have outed herself with Crohn's would have meant (sadly) a future of people speculating about her bowels, her stomach and her wellness for the rest of her entire life. Peoole would be looking for the outline of a bag at all public functions for the rest of her life.. What person on a global stage wants to have people speculate about the condition of their bowels. Really.


DP and I get all of that, but instead we have people speculating about divorce, eating disorders, abuse, self harm, and mental breakdowns. That's not better. It's not Kate's fault (I don't believe she had anything to do with photogate), but I wonder if she and/or the palace are wishing they'd been more transparent from the beginning.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Is it the Marchioness of Cholmondeley?

I keep reading it as marionette of chlamydia. 😂


Spit water out
Anonymous
Have the conspiracy theorists considered that the reason why her face looks similar to the Vogue shoot is because she’s the same person? And has a go-to pose/smile?

There’s a dimpling in the vogue cover that isn’t present in the Mother’s Day pic. Also she’s wearing a hat, which would be pretty annoying to remove for a professional, let alone an amateur.

I’m with you that something is weird with William and Kate right now, but I don’t think she spliced a magazine cover onto her body.

Signed,
Someone who always defends MM in these threads
Anonymous
Car photo is also doctored.

This is CRAZY!!

This has all been fun but now I really thinj she may be really, really in trouble
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Have the conspiracy theorists considered that the reason why her face looks similar to the Vogue shoot is because she’s the same person? And has a go-to pose/smile?

There’s a dimpling in the vogue cover that isn’t present in the Mother’s Day pic. Also she’s wearing a hat, which would be pretty annoying to remove for a professional, let alone an amateur.

I’m with you that something is weird with William and Kate right now, but I don’t think she spliced a magazine cover onto her body.

Signed,
Someone who always defends MM in these threads


Its already been proven to be lifted - catch up we’re onto the SECOND doctored photo of the week
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The car photo is fake too.

https://x.com/mrliamwest/status/1767559938841231523?s=46&t=QqglXhsgC33LWVa3mC0ZAg


I just saw this and it made me do a double take! very damming


Aside from this one thing that made me question it is her hair being in a chignon on the photo. She often wears her hair down and that seems most likely when she was supposedly being dropped off for a private appt., rather than a fussy chignon when the public obviously wasn’t seeing her.


Take a deep breath. You're getting crazy.

The photographers who took the car picture are not amused by your "sleuthing".

"The paparazzo who snapped the pic of Kate Middleton riding alongside Prince William in a car Monday is speaking out to quash online conspiracy theories that the photo was doctored.

“We don’t change our photos in Photoshop other than adjusting the light levels if necessary,” photographer Jim Bennett told The Post."

https://nypost.com/2024/03/12/world-news/photographer-who-snapped-kate-middleton-hits-out-at-claims-image-was-doctored/




Interesting and I’m not really getting crazy. I’m home sick with a fever and cold and this whole situation is providing me with quite a bit of distraction. In all seriousness, I hope she’s okay. She seems like a decent enough person and a loving mom and I certainly don’t wish ill on her or any of them really.

I do think the chignon was of some sort of significance. She presumably wasn’t bothering with that to go to a doctors appt. or go visit her mom even if she has people to do her hair.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:American media doing the dirty work

https://x.com/tudorchick1501/status/1767317162098622875


Dirty, yes. These links don’t say anything. They’re just more speculation and more of what is in this thread.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Car photo is also doctored.

This is CRAZY!!

This has all been fun but now I really thinj she may be really, really in trouble


No, the car photo is not doctored. The photographers have said it's not.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The car photo is fake too.

https://x.com/mrliamwest/status/1767559938841231523?s=46&t=QqglXhsgC33LWVa3mC0ZAg


I just saw this and it made me do a double take! very damming


Aside from this one thing that made me question it is her hair being in a chignon on the photo. She often wears her hair down and that seems most likely when she was supposedly being dropped off for a private appt., rather than a fussy chignon when the public obviously wasn’t seeing her.

that was my immediate thought as well - her hair would be down or in a lazy pony.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Car photo is also doctored.

This is CRAZY!!

This has all been fun but now I really thinj she may be really, really in trouble


Agree

See American media
Anonymous
My original fantasy (in addition to Crohn's or eating disorder treatment) was that that she was pregnant, and had an ectopic pregnancy (that was deeply emotionally and physically traumatic) which perhaps also resulted in an emergency hysterectomy. I suspected she was then mourning not only the pregnancy but future pregnancies, essentially needing healing physically and emotionally because she was depressed, understandably. (Perhaps she was also at risk of sepsis and the situation was quite serious). BUT hearing now about the marriage and the picture fiasco makes me indeed wonder if they are separating or in a deep marital crisis. Reports of his drinking provide more fodder as well as the odd timing of reports whereby it was stated that William and nanny were handling school runs followed by close declarations that HER family was circling the wagons and doing much of the caregiving. Multiple things can be happening at once (individual issues, marital crisis, larger family dynamics...perhaps Charles is very ill and they are reeling as they prepare to take over years earlier than expected and scrambling, particularly if the marriage is also troubled). Intuitively, it feels like it is a troubled marriage which is deeply sad if true.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Car photo is also doctored.

This is CRAZY!!

This has all been fun but now I really thinj she may be really, really in trouble


No, the car photo is not doctored. The photographers have said it's not.

/s. 😉
Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: