Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Palin Speaking in Fairfax Right Now, and Repeating Same Speech, AGAIN!
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
|
I don't hear a single new thing in any speech. I don't get it.
|
Anonymous
| Oh, wait, she's actually making minor corrections like, "I put it on Ebay" and "I took the personal chef off the budget." |
Anonymous
| The same speech from the RNC? Is she still denigrating community organizers and patting herself on the back for the "just say no to that bridge" lie? |
Anonymous
| I didn't notice anything about community organizers but she definitely repeated the bridge lie. |
Anonymous
The blatant bridge lie is in their stump speeches, in their advertising, everywhere. If Charlie Gibson doesn't ask her to address it (which wouldn't surprise me), it will be truly maddening. |
Anonymous
| 23000 people showed up to hear them. |
Anonymous
|
I'm so glad I'm not the only one who's noticed she keeps repeating herself. I'm about to loose it! They need to let her address the media on her own, and move on from the darn RNC speech. She says the same darn things every speech...
She's repeating the bridge line, changed up the e-bay joke, and has used the McCain would rather lose an Election than lose a war so many times my head is spinning! |
Anonymous
| Yes, last night Chris Matthew showed clips of her using the "bridge to nowhere" line SEVEN times at seven different events... and in the clips it looked like she was repeating the exact same RNC speech... same delivery, intonation, wording, everything! THIS is what's inspiring people? Frightening, truly frightening. |
Anonymous
| Heck, the lady knows her lines. If this whole second in command of 300 million people thing doesn't work out, she could be a hell of a soap opera actress. |
Anonymous
yup. It's called brainwashing. If you repeat it over and over it may stick as facts. |
Anonymous
|
The youtube piece on her press conference with Stevens showed her matter-of-factly saying that earmarks were a good thing when Alaska was young but now that she had heard the two presidential candidates she could see the writing on the wall and it was time to move away from them.
She wasn't being a reformer. She was acting like a pragmatist who could see the wind was changing. I think the proper response to the "maverick reformer" claim is to label her an OPPORTUNIST. |
Anonymous
| I think this is the reason so many people are angry. She's saying nothing new and everything she is saying has been scripted. |
Anonymous
| If the speach worked for her the first time of course they are going to ride it for as long as they can. It is not a campaign about the issues on the Rep side but of personalities... |
Anonymous
|
This is the OP. I understand the GOP's motives for having her deliver the same script over and over, I just can't believe people are buying it. But they clearly are.
It's like a traveling medicine show, trying to swindle poor folk into buying some crazy elixer. The poor folk don't know any better because it's 1920, they're in small towns, and they don't have access to major media to be warned of the swindle. Except it's 2008, they're rich folk in major urban areas, and they've seen it on TV a bunch of times. Sigh. |
Anonymous
| So well put 15:28. |