The Nationals and Team Obama

[Anonymous]

Two teams that will be winners in November.

That is all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Two teams that will be winners in November.That is all.

Too bad he wears a white sox jacket any time he shows up to a Nationals game. Carry on.

[Anonymous]

If he wore a Nationals jacket, you would complain that he was frittering away his time while unemployment was still high. And if Michelle Obama wore it, you would criticize her choice in clothing, because that is what wingnuts do.

If Obama never went to the game you would say he is tone deaf for not supporting America's past time.

Gotcha.

[Anonymous]

Sorry, niether will be winning O's and Romney

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If he wore a Nationals jacket, you would complain that he was frittering away his time while unemployment was still high. And if Michelle Obama wore it, you would criticize her choice in clothing, because that is what wingnuts do.

If Obama never went to the game you would say he is tone deaf for not supporting America's past time.

Gotcha.

Yikes. The pharmacy called and your Rx ready for pickup. Better hurry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If he wore a Nationals jacket, you would complain that he was frittering away his time while unemployment was still high. And if Michelle Obama wore it, you would criticize her choice in clothing, because that is what wingnuts do.

If Obama never went to the game you would say he is tone deaf for not supporting America's past time.

Gotcha.

Yikes. The pharmacy called and your Rx ready for pickup. Better hurry.

the wingnuts can't even do wit right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If he wore a Nationals jacket, you would complain that he was frittering away his time while unemployment was still high. And if Michelle Obama wore it, you would criticize her choice in clothing, because that is what wingnuts do.

If Obama never went to the game you would say he is tone deaf for not supporting America's past time.

Gotcha.

Yikes. The pharmacy called and your Rx ready for pickup. Better hurry.

If I have a disease, it is that I remember what the wingnuts on this site wrote. If you know of a drug that allows me to selectively erase this junk from my mind, I'd gladly take it.

Here's the thread where Obama gets criticized for not calling to congratulate the world series champs fast enough (he did do it btw). The quote was "cannot follow the basic script of what it means to be President of the United States" http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/133777.page

Here's the thread where Michelle Obama is called "out of touch" for buying an $85 tote bag, a $55 tank top, and a $45 dog leash. I'd bet that's just slightly more expensive than an official Nationals team jacket. The title of the thread was "Obama Couture" http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/241930.page#2510340

And here's the thread where Obama gets criticized for doing a short interview in which he gives his picks for the NCAA tournament instead of fixing our economy. It was entitled "With Japan crumbling, the Mid East erupting, $4 gas, 10% unemployment etc this is what Obama does..." http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/156014.page

[Anonymous]

I know, really. And no one ever criticizes Republicans on DCUM. I mean just look at the parallel thread about Ann's earrings and dress. I guess "wingnut" is a term for both sides of the aisle?

[Anonymous]

A win for karl marx , a lost for freedom

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:I know, really. And no one ever criticizes Republicans on DCUM. I mean just look at the parallel thread about Ann's earrings and dress. I guess "wingnut" is a term for both sides of the aisle?

You seem really worked up about the earrings thread given the number of times you have mentioned it. But, have you read the thread yourself? It has nearly 100 posts. About three of the posts are about earrings. It is hardly a thread about earrings. Would you describe the Michelle Obama thread as the "horse teeth" thread because some idiot used that phrase in a couple of posts?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I know, really. And no one ever criticizes Republicans on DCUM. I mean just look at the parallel thread about Ann's earrings and dress. I guess "wingnut" is a term for both sides of the aisle?

You totally missed the point. The wingnuts aren't just criticizing. They find fault regardless of what action the President or First Lady takes. It does not matter, and it does not bother them in the slightest that they contradict themselves in order to do it.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know, really. And no one ever criticizes Republicans on DCUM. I mean just look at the parallel thread about Ann's earrings and dress. I guess "wingnut" is a term for both sides of the aisle?

You seem really worked up about the earrings thread given the number of times you have mentioned it. But, have you read the thread yourself? It has nearly 100 posts. About three of the posts are about earrings. It is hardly a thread about earrings. Would you describe the Michelle Obama thread as the "horse teeth" thread because some idiot used that phrase in a couple of posts?

And there it is. You pulled your trump card. We went around a while back discussing your ability/tendency to search certain poster's other posts. (At that time someone had accused you of outing her in her poor relationship or something. I don't remember the details but you can look it up). Also at that time I defended your innocence (you said you could find no such thread) but I also said if you traced a non-abuser's posts and write based on your insider's knowledge, that I'd find that crummy. You did and I do. Also proves my point that you can be a bully with opinions you don't agree with. And don't get your feelings hurt, I also have said that you often have useful and informative posts. But you know all that. I feel you've acted outside your wheelhouse here. I'm equally aware you're the fox minding the henhouse. So I'll be going now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know, really. And no one ever criticizes Republicans on DCUM. I mean just look at the parallel thread about Ann's earrings and dress. I guess "wingnut" is a term for both sides of the aisle?

You seem really worked up about the earrings thread given the number of times you have mentioned it. But, have you read the thread yourself? It has nearly 100 posts. About three of the posts are about earrings. It is hardly a thread about earrings. Would you describe the Michelle Obama thread as the "horse teeth" thread because some idiot used that phrase in a couple of posts?

And there it is. You pulled your trump card. We went around a while back discussing your ability/tendency to search certain poster's other posts. (At that time someone had accused you of outing her in her poor relationship or something. I don't remember the details but you can look it up). Also at that time I defended your innocence (you said you could find no such thread) but I also said if you traced a non-abuser's posts and write based on your insider's knowledge, that I'd find that crummy. You did and I do. Also proves my point that you can be a bully with opinions you don't agree with. And don't get your feelings hurt, I also have said that you often have useful and informative posts. But you know all that. I feel you've acted outside your wheelhouse here. I'm equally aware you're the fox minding the henhouse. So I'll be going now.

Who was the shrinking violet? She sure did go off in a huff. Apparently she feels it unfair that she gets judged on the content of her own posts?? WTF???

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know, really. And no one ever criticizes Republicans on DCUM. I mean just look at the parallel thread about Ann's earrings and dress. I guess "wingnut" is a term for both sides of the aisle?

You seem really worked up about the earrings thread given the number of times you have mentioned it. But, have you read the thread yourself? It has nearly 100 posts. About three of the posts are about earrings. It is hardly a thread about earrings. Would you describe the Michelle Obama thread as the "horse teeth" thread because some idiot used that phrase in a couple of posts?

And there it is. You pulled your trump card. We went around a while back discussing your ability/tendency to search certain poster's other posts. (At that time someone had accused you of outing her in her poor relationship or something. I don't remember the details but you can look it up). Also at that time I defended your innocence (you said you could find no such thread) but I also said if you traced a non-abuser's posts and write based on your insider's knowledge, that I'd find that crummy. You did and I do. Also proves my point that you can be a bully with opinions you don't agree with. And don't get your feelings hurt, I also have said that you often have useful and informative posts. But you know all that. I feel you've acted outside your wheelhouse here. I'm equally aware you're the fox minding the henhouse. So I'll be going now.

Who was the shrinking violet? She sure did go off in a huff. Apparently she feels it unfair that she gets judged on the content of her own posts?? WTF???

It's not the first complaint I've read about where Jeff pieces together pp's posts, old or elsewhere on DCUM, for a good comeback.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know, really. And no one ever criticizes Republicans on DCUM. I mean just look at the parallel thread about Ann's earrings and dress. I guess "wingnut" is a term for both sides of the aisle?

You seem really worked up about the earrings thread given the number of times you have mentioned it. But, have you read the thread yourself? It has nearly 100 posts. About three of the posts are about earrings. It is hardly a thread about earrings. Would you describe the Michelle Obama thread as the "horse teeth" thread because some idiot used that phrase in a couple of posts?

And there it is. You pulled your trump card. We went around a while back discussing your ability/tendency to search certain poster's other posts. (At that time someone had accused you of outing her in her poor relationship or something. I don't remember the details but you can look it up). Also at that time I defended your innocence (you said you could find no such thread) but I also said if you traced a non-abuser's posts and write based on your insider's knowledge, that I'd find that crummy. You did and I do. Also proves my point that you can be a bully with opinions you don't agree with. And don't get your feelings hurt, I also have said that you often have useful and informative posts. But you know all that. I feel you've acted outside your wheelhouse here. I'm equally aware you're the fox minding the henhouse. So I'll be going now.

Yeah, yeah, but is he telling the truth about you, sis-ta!