The Nationals and Team Obama

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know, really. And no one ever criticizes Republicans on DCUM. I mean just look at the parallel thread about Ann's earrings and dress. I guess "wingnut" is a term for both sides of the aisle?

You seem really worked up about the earrings thread given the number of times you have mentioned it. But, have you read the thread yourself? It has nearly 100 posts. About three of the posts are about earrings. It is hardly a thread about earrings. Would you describe the Michelle Obama thread as the "horse teeth" thread because some idiot used that phrase in a couple of posts?

And there it is. You pulled your trump card. We went around a while back discussing your ability/tendency to search certain poster's other posts. (At that time someone had accused you of outing her in her poor relationship or something. I don't remember the details but you can look it up). Also at that time I defended your innocence (you said you could find no such thread) but I also said if you traced a non-abuser's posts and write based on your insider's knowledge, that I'd find that crummy. You did and I do. Also proves my point that you can be a bully with opinions you don't agree with. And don't get your feelings hurt, I also have said that you often have useful and informative posts. But you know all that. I feel you've acted outside your wheelhouse here. I'm equally aware you're the fox minding the henhouse. So I'll be going now.

Yeah, yeah, but is he telling the truth about you, sis-ta!

Not "sis-ta" but wasn't the earring thread titled "Ann Romney's Earimngs"? The MO thread is not "MO's Horse Teeth". So, not really analogous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know, really. And no one ever criticizes Republicans on DCUM. I mean just look at the parallel thread about Ann's earrings and dress. I guess "wingnut" is a term for both sides of the aisle?

You seem really worked up about the earrings thread given the number of times you have mentioned it. But, have you read the thread yourself? It has nearly 100 posts. About three of the posts are about earrings. It is hardly a thread about earrings. Would you describe the Michelle Obama thread as the "horse teeth" thread because some idiot used that phrase in a couple of posts?

And there it is. You pulled your trump card. We went around a while back discussing your ability/tendency to search certain poster's other posts. (At that time someone had accused you of outing her in her poor relationship or something. I don't remember the details but you can look it up). Also at that time I defended your innocence (you said you could find no such thread) but I also said if you traced a non-abuser's posts and write based on your insider's knowledge, that I'd find that crummy. You did and I do. Also proves my point that you can be a bully with opinions you don't agree with. And don't get your feelings hurt, I also have said that you often have useful and informative posts. But you know all that. I feel you've acted outside your wheelhouse here. I'm equally aware you're the fox minding the henhouse. So I'll be going now.

Who was the shrinking violet? She sure did go off in a huff. Apparently she feels it unfair that she gets judged on the content of her own posts?? WTF???

It's not the first complaint I've read about where Jeff pieces together pp's posts, old or elsewhere on DCUM, for a good comeback.

Uh, so your complaint is that Jeff debates someone by repeating their own words, verbatim. So he has violated your constitutional right to be an undetected hypocrite.

There is a simple answer within your grasp. Don't be a hypocrite.