Kane from Kaneshow divorcing and crying on air right now (Part 3)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who goes to the ER with and open/bleeding head wound and doesn't have it checked. Does that really happen? Clearly they thought she was a mental case.

Here's the thing: Natasha had/has long term Lyme disease. She's probably on a lot of meds and supplements as a result. When you go to the Dr or the ER with that history, they assume you are a nutcase, even if you are there for a totally unrelated and valid reason. I believe that the doctor sent her home without a real examination.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who goes to the ER with and open/bleeding head wound and doesn't have it checked. Does that really happen? Clearly they thought she was a mental case.

Here's the thing: Natasha had/has long term Lyme disease. She's probably on a lot of meds and supplements as a result. When you go to the Dr or the ER with that history, they assume you are a nutcase, even if you are there for a totally unrelated and valid reason. I believe that the doctor sent her home without a real examination.

I've had Lyme disease, my husband has Lymes disease. You don't take mess for it after

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who goes to the ER with and open/bleeding head wound and doesn't have it checked. Does that really happen? Clearly they thought she was a mental case.

Here's the thing: Natasha had/has long term Lyme disease. She's probably on a lot of meds and supplements as a result. When you go to the Dr or the ER with that history, they assume you are a nutcase, even if you are there for a totally unrelated and valid reason. I believe that the doctor sent her home without a real examination.

I've had Lyme disease, my husband has Lymes disease. You don't take mess for it after

For chronic lyme? you don't need to take anything?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She want sympathy from her posts (hard to call it a blog when her posts are months apart). But she just comes across as pathetic. She seems so confused and bewildered why her marriage crashed and why he's acting like she says he is. She knows why. So pathetic.

Agreed. What does she do with her days when the girls are at school? She has enough time to blog almost daily. If she got a legitimate job (not blogging, not YouTube videos, an actual salaried job job) I would be shocked.

[Anonymous]

I've been somewhat pro-Natasha after the divorce, even when people were hating on her for being a stay home mom when she was still with Peter, because that was the decision she and Peter made together. But goddamn woman, it's been almost a year after the divorce is filed. Why aren't you getting a job yet, unless you want people to think those allegations that you're a gold digger is true? Maybe she has been looking for a job at a barn with horses and I'm just clueless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who goes to the ER with and open/bleeding head wound and doesn't have it checked. Does that really happen? Clearly they thought she was a mental case.

Here's the thing: Natasha had/has long term Lyme disease. She's probably on a lot of meds and supplements as a result. When you go to the Dr or the ER with that history, they assume you are a nutcase, even if you are there for a totally unrelated and valid reason. I believe that the doctor sent her home without a real examination.

I've had Lyme disease, my husband has Lymes disease. You don't take mess for it after

For chronic lyme? you don't need to take anything?

There's no such thing as chronic Lyme

[Anonymous]

Natasha had Lyme disease and fibromyalgia?

[Anonymous]

Stop hating on Natasha. She doesn't need to get a job. She has two little girls and one of them is in school full time, the little one is half day. Kane makes enough money to support her without her having to. There is nothing wrong with being a Sahm. When both girls are in Scholls full time and they are older she probably will get a job. She's not stupid, she actually very smart. Just keep in mind, kane's money is her money too...he couldn't do all those additional gigs without her being home with their children. When she's ready to post her blog, she will!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Stop hating on Natasha. She doesn't need to get a job. She has two little girls and one of them is in school full time, the little one is half day. Kane makes enough money to support her without her having to. There is nothing wrong with being a Sahm. When both girls are in Scholls full time and they are older she probably will get a job. She's not stupid, she actually very smart. Just keep in mind, kane's money is her money too...he couldn't do all those additional gigs without her being home with their children. When she's ready to post her blog, she will!

Preach! Tired of women constantly putting other women down. This went from gossip to just bashing people based on assumptions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Stop hating on Natasha. She doesn't need to get a job. She has two little girls and one of them is in school full time, the little one is half day. Kane makes enough money to support her without her having to. There is nothing wrong with being a Sahm. When both girls are in Scholls full time and they are older she probably will get a job. She's not stupid, she actually very smart. Just keep in mind, kane's money is her money too...he couldn't do all those additional gigs without her being home with their children. When she's ready to post her blog, she will!

I don't personally care about Natasha one way or the other, but I never understand why if a couple decide that they want their kids to have a SAHP while they're married, that the decision would suddenly be different if they divorce. In a situation where there's not enough income to support two households after a divorce, then obviously the SAHP needs to get a job, but that's probably not Natasha and Peter's situation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who goes to the ER with and open/bleeding head wound and doesn't have it checked. Does that really happen? Clearly they thought she was a mental case.

Here's the thing: Natasha had/has long term Lyme disease. She's probably on a lot of meds and supplements as a result. When you go to the Dr or the ER with that history, they assume you are a nutcase, even if you are there for a totally unrelated and valid reason. I believe that the doctor sent her home without a real examination.

I've had Lyme disease, my husband has Lymes disease. You don't take mess for it after

For chronic lyme? you don't need to take anything?

There's no such thing as chronic Lyme

Um yes there is. If you get lymes disease and it goes undiagnosed and untreated, it gets very serious and difficult to diagnose. I remember reading a story about Avril Lavigne having chronic lyme. She would be so tired she would fall asleep and wake up days later.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Stop hating on Natasha. She doesn't need to get a job. She has two little girls and one of them is in school full time, the little one is half day. Kane makes enough money to support her without her having to. There is nothing wrong with being a Sahm. When both girls are in Scholls full time and they are older she probably will get a job. She's not stupid, she actually very smart. Just keep in mind, kane's money is her money too...he couldn't do all those additional gigs without her being home with their children. When she's ready to post her blog, she will!

Yeah and within a year both will be in full-day. Her biggest mistake was not getting pregnant before she started hiding all the money and made her grand escape, lol. She should at least own up to the fact that she's a gold digger. She's ridiculous. When she posted the pair of $100-something shoes on IG and said ohhh how nice but out of my price range I thought, ok... Until you go literally a few posts back where she's showing off an almost $100 necklace she bought to make herself feel better when she's alone Natasha, you know what could bring you validation and satisfaction during those times P has the girls? A JOB. Or you could keep moping around, buying yourself things and twittering around online.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stop hating on Natasha. She doesn't need to get a job. She has two little girls and one of them is in school full time, the little one is half day. Kane makes enough money to support her without her having to. There is nothing wrong with being a Sahm. When both girls are in Scholls full time and they are older she probably will get a job. She's not stupid, she actually very smart. Just keep in mind, kane's money is her money too...he couldn't do all those additional gigs without her being home with their children. When she's ready to post her blog, she will!

I don't personally care about Natasha one way or the other, but I never understand why if a couple decide that they want their kids to have a SAHP while they're married, that the decision would suddenly be different if they divorce. In a situation where there's not enough income to support two households after a divorce, then obviously the SAHP needs to get a job, but that's probably not Natasha and Peter's situation.

Are you serious? Because once the decision is made to divorce, it shouldn't be up to the working parent to continue to support the non-working parent's lifestyle, they are not a married couple anymore. I understand while children are still young, but once they are older and both in school full time, there shouldn't be any reason why the non-working parent cannot go out and get at least a part-time job. What happens when the working parent wants to remarry but has to continue paying giant alimony checks to the non-working parent that doesn't want to support themselves? How would that be fair?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stop hating on Natasha. She doesn't need to get a job. She has two little girls and one of them is in school full time, the little one is half day. Kane makes enough money to support her without her having to. There is nothing wrong with being a Sahm. When both girls are in Scholls full time and they are older she probably will get a job. She's not stupid, she actually very smart. Just keep in mind, kane's money is her money too...he couldn't do all those additional gigs without her being home with their children. When she's ready to post her blog, she will!

I don't personally care about Natasha one way or the other, but I never understand why if a couple decide that they want their kids to have a SAHP while they're married, that the decision would suddenly be different if they divorce. In a situation where there's not enough income to support two households after a divorce, then obviously the SAHP needs to get a job, but that's probably not Natasha and Peter's situation.

I get what you're saying but part of the deal with a stay at home parent is that they are taking care of the kids and the house and the spouse. He's not having his house or himself taken care of by her so now he's forced to pay for his ex wife to stay at home and do whatever she wants all day and pay for her house, her clothes, her things. I'm not saying SAHP have it easy but they only have two kids and both those kids are in school and when they are out of school, they spend half their time with their dad. None of her money is her own money. Anything she buys is with his money since she doesn't work. I get him paying for the house where his kids live and any cost of living that goes with the kids but she should at least get a part time job to have her own money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stop hating on Natasha. She doesn't need to get a job. She has two little girls and one of them is in school full time, the little one is half day. Kane makes enough money to support her without her having to. There is nothing wrong with being a Sahm. When both girls are in Scholls full time and they are older she probably will get a job. She's not stupid, she actually very smart. Just keep in mind, kane's money is her money too...he couldn't do all those additional gigs without her being home with their children. When she's ready to post her blog, she will!

I don't personally care about Natasha one way or the other, but I never understand why if a couple decide that they want their kids to have a SAHP while they're married, that the decision would suddenly be different if they divorce. In a situation where there's not enough income to support two households after a divorce, then obviously the SAHP needs to get a job, but that's probably not Natasha and Peter's situation.

I get what you're saying but part of the deal with a stay at home parent is that they are taking care of the kids and the house and the spouse. He's not having his house or himself taken care of by her so now he's forced to pay for his ex wife to stay at home and do whatever she wants all day and pay for her house, her clothes, her things. I'm not saying SAHP have it easy but they only have two kids and both those kids are in school and when they are out of school, they spend half their time with their dad. None of her money is her own money. Anything she buys is with his money since she doesn't work. I get him paying for the house where his kids live and any cost of living that goes with the kids but she should at least get a part time job to have her own money.

This was exactly my point! I tried to put it in more general terms, because I really wonder what people would be saying if the situation were reversed, and it was the woman who worked and made the money and the man stayed home. Would you tell the man that he doesn't need to get a job and that he should get to continue to stay at home and his wife should pay for him to do so?