Another ICE Shooting in Minnesota

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the officers didn’t even notice his hand gun in the first encounter. He was lucky he wasn’t arrested, shot, or disarmed then. Then he follows ICE around for more? Wild.

He probably should have been arrested that day, yes. But that's not related to his being disarmed and shot days later.

No”probably” about it. He would be alive today if he had been arrested then, as he should have been. ALL of these agitators should be arrested at first offense and carted off for processing and booking.

Most of them are standing, whistling, yelling, filming. You can't legitimately arrest them for that. The only difference is on Jan. 13 he kicked a car. That's what you'd arrest him for. That said, five ICE agents shouldn't have tackled him and broken his rib in response.

.

Why not? If someone kicked out my car tail light and spit at me, and I had a few big guys in the car with me, you’d better believe I’d want them to tackle the perp and wrestle him to the ground. If his poor rib gets broken, so what?

And then you'd be charged with assault. So there's that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the officers didn’t even notice his hand gun in the first encounter. He was lucky he wasn’t arrested, shot, or disarmed then. Then he follows ICE around for more? Wild.

He probably should have been arrested that day, yes. But that's not related to his being disarmed and shot days later.

No”probably” about it. He would be alive today if he had been arrested then, as he should have been. ALL of these agitators should be arrested at first offense and carted off for processing and booking.

Most of them are standing, whistling, yelling, filming. You can't legitimately arrest them for that. The only difference is on Jan. 13 he kicked a car. That's what you'd arrest him for. That said, five ICE agents shouldn't have tackled him and broken his rib in response.

.

Why not? If someone kicked out my car tail light and spit at me, and I had a few big guys in the car with me, you’d better believe I’d want them to tackle the perp and wrestle him to the ground. If his poor rib gets broken, so what?

And then you'd be charged with assault. So there's that.

Uhhh...depends on the ciry and who's doing the assaulting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the officers didn’t even notice his hand gun in the first encounter. He was lucky he wasn’t arrested, shot, or disarmed then. Then he follows ICE around for more? Wild.

He probably should have been arrested that day, yes. But that's not related to his being disarmed and shot days later.

No”probably” about it. He would be alive today if he had been arrested then, as he should have been. ALL of these agitators should be arrested at first offense and carted off for processing and booking.

Most of them are standing, whistling, yelling, filming. You can't legitimately arrest them for that. The only difference is on Jan. 13 he kicked a car. That's what you'd arrest him for. That said, five ICE agents shouldn't have tackled him and broken his rib in response.

.

Why not? If someone kicked out my car tail light and spit at me, and I had a few big guys in the car with me, you’d better believe I’d want them to tackle the perp and wrestle him to the ground. If his poor rib gets broken, so what?

And then you'd be charged with assault. So there's that.

Uhhh...depends on the ciry and who's doing the assaulting.

City

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the officers didn’t even notice his hand gun in the first encounter. He was lucky he wasn’t arrested, shot, or disarmed then. Then he follows ICE around for more? Wild.

He probably should have been arrested that day, yes. But that's not related to his being disarmed and shot days later.

No”probably” about it. He would be alive today if he had been arrested then, as he should have been. ALL of these agitators should be arrested at first offense and carted off for processing and booking.

Most of them are standing, whistling, yelling, filming. You can't legitimately arrest them for that. The only difference is on Jan. 13 he kicked a car. That's what you'd arrest him for. That said, five ICE agents shouldn't have tackled him and broken his rib in response.

.

Why not? If someone kicked out my car tail light and spit at me, and I had a few big guys in the car with me, you’d better believe I’d want them to tackle the perp and wrestle him to the ground. If his poor rib gets broken, so what?

…and then you’d go to court.

And I have a very good attorney

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

If this ever gets properly investigated premeditation is going to be on the table.

[Anonymous]

^^^ won’t embed because the video is graphic, but shows that two Border agents who were part of the group that interacted with Alex Pretti when he was killed, confirmed by their numbers NS-919 and NS-909, are in this [earlier] video.

NS-919 was one of the main instigators of the Pretti encounter -- pushing the woman initially. Here is a clearer shot of him from allegedly days before Pretti died.
https://x.com/jsweetli/status/2016900430509265055?s=46&t=kf1qYlCXQnKgUhJWEIu2vg

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I finally found another angle, so it appears to be real.

Thinking people should be skeptical until verification is available.

https://youtu.be/p2TRbFmutrw

Wow, why aren't the local police arresting these people middle of the street, spitting, threatening and breaking property. We all joke about dc sandwich guy but he got arrested and notice dc isn't like this?

There are only 600 local police and 3,000 ICE and other federal agents wreaking havoc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If they done this from the beginning we wouldn't be in this mess.

This only works if the local police will be engaging with agitators. Which they wouldn't do, under orders.

Because the police are trained enough to understand the first amendment, at least on a superficial basis.

Local leaders were telling the police not to assist ICE.

With what, their feeling?

They are cops not therapists. Listen, even Donnie diapers has admitted this was a bad shoot. Get new talking points.

+1 Rand Paul telling NewsMax should clue you in.

[Anonymous]

ICE agent in a private chat with colleagues: "Ten versus one and somehow they couldn’t find a way to subdue the guy...They all carry belts and vests with 9,000 pieces of equipment on them and the best they can do is shoot a guy in the back?”

https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/ices-secret-watchlists-of-americans

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the officers didn’t even notice his hand gun in the first encounter. He was lucky he wasn’t arrested, shot, or disarmed then. Then he follows ICE around for more? Wild.

He probably should have been arrested that day, yes. But that's not related to his being disarmed and shot days later.

No”probably” about it. He would be alive today if he had been arrested then, as he should have been. ALL of these agitators should be arrested at first offense and carted off for processing and booking.

Most of them are standing, whistling, yelling, filming. You can't legitimately arrest them for that. The only difference is on Jan. 13 he kicked a car. That's what you'd arrest him for. That said, five ICE agents shouldn't have tackled him and broken his rib in response.

They should have cuffed him and take him in the ICE facility for a couple days to chill out. He would be alive today but no he wanted what he got.

[Anonymous]

These people been protesting like this all their lives with no repercussions. Now death happens and people wonder why.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the officers didn’t even notice his hand gun in the first encounter. He was lucky he wasn’t arrested, shot, or disarmed then. Then he follows ICE around for more? Wild.

He probably should have been arrested that day, yes. But that's not related to his being disarmed and shot days later.

No”probably” about it. He would be alive today if he had been arrested then, as he should have been. ALL of these agitators should be arrested at first offense and carted off for processing and booking.

Most of them are standing, whistling, yelling, filming. You can't legitimately arrest them for that. The only difference is on Jan. 13 he kicked a car. That's what you'd arrest him for. That said, five ICE agents shouldn't have tackled him and broken his rib in response.

They should have cuffed him and take him in the ICE facility for a couple days to chill out. He would be alive today but no he wanted what he got.

I don’t ever want to hear whining about ashleeeee babitt it again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:These people been protesting like this all their lives with no repercussions. Now death happens and people wonder why.

“These people” are Americans trying to save the country.

You might catch the next Aeroflot flight to a place more to your liking.