Another ICE Shooting in Minnesota

[Anonymous]

Have we seen the bodycam from the agent who shot Pretti?

I thought it was confirmed that bodycam footage existed.

You KNOW if it was exonerating for the agent, they would have posted it already.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If they done this from the beginning we wouldn't be in this mess.

+1. And their polls would have been amazing. Never ceases to amaze me how Trump manages to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

Exactly. They would have guaranteed a Republican victory in the midterms and 2028. It blows my mind that being cruel is more important than anything else.

That’s Steven Miller for you. His bloodlust and desire for absolute power has drowned out whatever political skills he had to get into Trump’s inner circle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That new video from days before Pretti's killing shows at least three of the same agents, including one of the main instigators of Pretti incident who pushed the woman, in another altercation --confirmed by his number NS-919.

IOW, this was likely a planned execution in retaliation.

Premeditation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That new video from days before Pretti's killing shows at least three of the same agents, including one of the main instigators of Pretti incident who pushed the woman, in another altercation --confirmed by his number NS-919.

IOW, this was likely a planned execution in retaliation.

The video showed agents assaulted him a week ago too and broke his rib.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't necessarily believe those other videos are real, could be AI. Let's hear from the person who recorded it

Someone should see if he was at work the day of the kicking incident. I’m not sure what kind of schedule VA nurses work, but 11 days between days off is weird. I doubt a dedicated nurse was at protests on days he needed to report to work. The idea that taillights are so delicate is weird too.

If it’s real it proves premeditated murder.

[Anonymous]

I feel like with these new rules of engagement ICE is shooting themselves in the foot: Now the "agitators" know they use nonviolent protests to shield the actual ICE targets. But what do I know...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lets stop the violence.

Self-deportation is working. Recent estimates suggest that between 1 million and 2.5 million illegal aliens have left the United States since January 2025. The Center for Immigration Studies has conservatively estimated a decline of approximately 2.3 million in the foreign-born population. Why are so many leaving voluntarily? Because enforcement is credible – when illegal aliens believe they will be caught and removed, many choose to leave on their own.

This is exactly why Congress must pass mandatory E-Verify legislation. The same deterrent principle driving self-deportation would apply to the jobs magnet: if illegal aliens know they cannot get jobs because all employers must verify work authorization, many will not come – and those already here will leave voluntarily.

According to the Penn Wharton Budget Model, sustained enforcement would increase wages for authorized low-skilled American workers by up to 5%.

Please send a message to your three Members of Congress urging them to support and pass H.R. 251/S. 1151 to mandate E-Verify and remove the jobs magnet that attracts illegal labor.

No. I want revenge against republicans. ICE has to be sent in to Texas, Alabama, Florida, etc. The governors and their families of red states need to be arrested and deported.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If they done this from the beginning we wouldn't be in this mess.

This only works if the local police will be engaging with agitators. Which they wouldn't do, under orders.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If they done this from the beginning we wouldn't be in this mess.

This only works if the local police will be engaging with agitators. Which they wouldn't do, under orders.

Because the police are trained enough to understand the first amendment, at least on a superficial basis.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I feel like with these new rules of engagement ICE is shooting themselves in the foot: Now the "agitators" know they use nonviolent protests to shield the actual ICE targets. But what do I know...

By rules of engagement, you mean following the laws of the United States of America?

Constitutional rights?

The horror.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the officers didn’t even notice his hand gun in the first encounter. He was lucky he wasn’t arrested, shot, or disarmed then. Then he follows ICE around for more? Wild.

He probably should have been arrested that day, yes. But that's not related to his being disarmed and shot days later.

No”probably” about it. He would be alive today if he had been arrested then, as he should have been. ALL of these agitators should be arrested at first offense and carted off for processing and booking.

Most of them are standing, whistling, yelling, filming. You can't legitimately arrest them for that. The only difference is on Jan. 13 he kicked a car. That's what you'd arrest him for. That said, five ICE agents shouldn't have tackled him and broken his rib in response.

.

Why not? If someone kicked out my car tail light and spit at me, and I had a few big guys in the car with me, you’d better believe I’d want them to tackle the perp and wrestle him to the ground. If his poor rib gets broken, so what?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the officers didn’t even notice his hand gun in the first encounter. He was lucky he wasn’t arrested, shot, or disarmed then. Then he follows ICE around for more? Wild.

He probably should have been arrested that day, yes. But that's not related to his being disarmed and shot days later.

No”probably” about it. He would be alive today if he had been arrested then, as he should have been. ALL of these agitators should be arrested at first offense and carted off for processing and booking.

Most of them are standing, whistling, yelling, filming. You can't legitimately arrest them for that. The only difference is on Jan. 13 he kicked a car. That's what you'd arrest him for. That said, five ICE agents shouldn't have tackled him and broken his rib in response.

.

Why not? If someone kicked out my car tail light and spit at me, and I had a few big guys in the car with me, you’d better believe I’d want them to tackle the perp and wrestle him to the ground. If his poor rib gets broken, so what?

OK except they'd all then be guilty of assault and other such offenses...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If they done this from the beginning we wouldn't be in this mess.

This only works if the local police will be engaging with agitators. Which they wouldn't do, under orders.

Because the police are trained enough to understand the first amendment, at least on a superficial basis.

Local leaders were telling the police not to assist ICE.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the officers didn’t even notice his hand gun in the first encounter. He was lucky he wasn’t arrested, shot, or disarmed then. Then he follows ICE around for more? Wild.

He probably should have been arrested that day, yes. But that's not related to his being disarmed and shot days later.

No”probably” about it. He would be alive today if he had been arrested then, as he should have been. ALL of these agitators should be arrested at first offense and carted off for processing and booking.

Most of them are standing, whistling, yelling, filming. You can't legitimately arrest them for that. The only difference is on Jan. 13 he kicked a car. That's what you'd arrest him for. That said, five ICE agents shouldn't have tackled him and broken his rib in response.

.

Why not? If someone kicked out my car tail light and spit at me, and I had a few big guys in the car with me, you’d better believe I’d want them to tackle the perp and wrestle him to the ground. If his poor rib gets broken, so what?

…and then you’d go to court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If they done this from the beginning we wouldn't be in this mess.

This only works if the local police will be engaging with agitators. Which they wouldn't do, under orders.

Because the police are trained enough to understand the first amendment, at least on a superficial basis.

Local leaders were telling the police not to assist ICE.

With what, their feeling?

They are cops not therapists. Listen, even Donnie diapers has admitted this was a bad shoot. Get new talking points.