WP Article on LAMB's failure to re-open

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This entire drama is being stirred up by a few new, selfish loudmouth parents, who I am sure are posting over and over here. Most of the other parents are appalled by their behavior.

You have no ability to support this statement bc there is no data.

The “data” I have is all of the people talking about what assholes they are.

I think you’re the data ...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This entire drama is being stirred up by a few new, selfish loudmouth parents, who I am sure are posting over and over here. Most of the other parents are appalled by their behavior.

You have no ability to support this statement bc there is no data.

There are many parents who are afraid to voice their opinions at LAMB because of the over-the-top bullying they receive from the cultish parents on ParentSquare. Without an unbiased, anonymous survey that protects parents who express their opinions, we really don't know what "most" LAMB parents think.

Bullying? Cult? I thought they were kumbaya peace circle organizers with a dash of Spanish?

I should clarify that the bullying culty parents are only a subsection of parents. Having been at one other DC school, they existed there, too. I think it's just some weird mother thing I don't understand.

There are also many LAMB parents who I have found are welcoming, calm, constructive, and helpful. It's just the bully cult ones have a stifling influence on dialogue.

I see the misogynist has arrived. And now we know exactly who this poster is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This entire drama is being stirred up by a few new, selfish loudmouth parents, who I am sure are posting over and over here. Most of the other parents are appalled by their behavior.

You have no ability to support this statement bc there is no data.

There are many parents who are afraid to voice their opinions at LAMB because of the over-the-top bullying they receive from the cultish parents on ParentSquare. Without an unbiased, anonymous survey that protects parents who express their opinions, we really don't know what "most" LAMB parents think.

Bullying? Cult? I thought they were kumbaya peace circle organizers with a dash of Spanish?

I should clarify that the bullying culty parents are only a subsection of parents. Having been at one other DC school, they existed there, too. I think it's just some weird mother thing I don't understand.


There are also many LAMB parents who I have found are welcoming, calm, constructive, and helpful. It's just the bully cult ones have a stifling influence on dialogue.

I see the misogynist has arrived. And now we know exactly who this poster is.

Oh. I see how the conclusion might be made that I am a man. But no, I am the poster and am a woman. I am saying that there are weird competitive motherhood circles that I have never understood. I don’t understand undying and aggressive allegiance to a school, I don’t understand the secretiveness, I don’t understand the desire to suppress difference of opinion when those differences are expressed with respect and intent to better the institution.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This entire drama is being stirred up by a few new, selfish loudmouth parents, who I am sure are posting over and over here. Most of the other parents are appalled by their behavior.

You have no ability to support this statement bc there is no data.

The “data” I have is all of the people talking about what assholes they are.

See, you’re just an example of what the other poster was talking about in terms of cults and bullying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This entire drama is being stirred up by a few new, selfish loudmouth parents, who I am sure are posting over and over here. Most of the other parents are appalled by their behavior.

You have no ability to support this statement bc there is no data.

The “data” I have is all of the people talking about what assholes they are.

See, you’re just an example of what the other poster was talking about in terms of cults and bullying.

+1000. Speaks poorly of the school if that is PP’s response.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This entire drama is being stirred up by a few new, selfish loudmouth parents, who I am sure are posting over and over here. Most of the other parents are appalled by their behavior.

You have no ability to support this statement bc there is no data.

The “data” I have is all of the people talking about what assholes they are.

See, you’re just an example of what the other poster was talking about in terms of cults and bullying.

+1000. Speaks poorly of the school if that is PP’s response.

None of this thread should speak “of the school”. It’s about 3-4 people writing back and forth. “The school” it is not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This entire drama is being stirred up by a few new, selfish loudmouth parents, who I am sure are posting over and over here. Most of the other parents are appalled by their behavior.

You have no ability to support this statement bc there is no data.

The “data” I have is all of the people talking about what assholes they are.

See, you’re just an example of what the other poster was talking about in terms of cults and bullying.

The only bully that I’ve seen is one lunatic dad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This entire drama is being stirred up by a few new, selfish loudmouth parents, who I am sure are posting over and over here. Most of the other parents are appalled by their behavior.

You realize you sound like a rude loudmouth, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This entire drama is being stirred up by a few new, selfish loudmouth parents, who I am sure are posting over and over here. Most of the other parents are appalled by their behavior.

You have no ability to support this statement bc there is no data.

The “data” I have is all of the people talking about what assholes they are.

See, you’re just an example of what the other poster was talking about in terms of cults and bullying.

The only bully that I’ve seen is one lunatic dad.

Whew. You are apparently not on Parentsquare. Or you’re engaged in it yourself. Or maybe you’re not even a LAMB parent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This entire drama is being stirred up by a few new, selfish loudmouth parents, who I am sure are posting over and over here. Most of the other parents are appalled by their behavior.

You have no ability to support this statement bc there is no data.

The “data” I have is all of the people talking about what assholes they are.

See, you’re just an example of what the other poster was talking about in terms of cults and bullying.

+1000. Speaks poorly of the school if that is PP’s response.

None of this thread should speak “of the school”. It’s about 3-4 people writing back and forth. “The school” it is not.

No I think it is you calling people assholes and the same person responding to all the posters who are calling the response out as bullying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think these Washington post education hit pieces are very productive.

Meh. It got the administration of LAMB to actually start TALKING about reopening, and it got the PTO to say it would form a committee.

This.

That committee (actually a task force) already in the process of being formed before the article. It wasn’t a result of it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think these Washington post education hit pieces are very productive.

Meh. It got the administration of LAMB to actually start TALKING about reopening, and it got the PTO to say it would form a committee.

This.

That committee (actually a task force) already in the process of being formed before the article. It wasn’t a result of it.

Well then the article got the PTO to tell us about this task force, since we didn’t know.

Btw, is there any progress on this task force? PTO announced they would have more info in the next couple of days, and so far nothing.

Also does that Task Force have any power? Is it just there to have conversations? Will they make recommendations? Can the administration or teachers ignore those?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think these Washington post education hit pieces are very productive.

Meh. It got the administration of LAMB to actually start TALKING about reopening, and it got the PTO to say it would form a committee.

This.

That committee (actually a task force) already in the process of being formed before the article. It wasn’t a result of it.

Well then the article got the PTO to tell us about this task force, since we didn’t know.

Btw, is there any progress on this task force? PTO announced they would have more info in the next couple of days, and so far nothing.

Also does that Task Force have any power? Is it just there to have conversations? Will they make recommendations? Can the administration or teachers ignore those?

LAMB doesn’t have a good track record of listening to parents so.........

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think these Washington post education hit pieces are very productive.

Meh. It got the administration of LAMB to actually start TALKING about reopening, and it got the PTO to say it would form a committee.

This.

That committee (actually a task force) already in the process of being formed before the article. It wasn’t a result of it.

Well then the article got the PTO to tell us about this task force, since we didn’t know.

Btw, is there any progress on this task force? PTO announced they would have more info in the next couple of days, and so far nothing.

Also does that Task Force have any power? Is it just there to have conversations? Will they make recommendations? Can the administration or teachers ignore those?

LAMB doesn’t have a good track record of listening to parents so.........

The task force info was in the latest monthly bulletin a few days ago. They probably should have done a stand alone post, but look in there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think these Washington post education hit pieces are very productive.

Meh. It got the administration of LAMB to actually start TALKING about reopening, and it got the PTO to say it would form a committee.

This.

That committee (actually a task force) already in the process of being formed before the article. It wasn’t a result of it.

Well then the article got the PTO to tell us about this task force, since we didn’t know.

Btw, is there any progress on this task force? PTO announced they would have more info in the next couple of days, and so far nothing.

Also does that Task Force have any power? Is it just there to have conversations? Will they make recommendations? Can the administration or teachers ignore those?

LAMB doesn’t have a good track record of listening to parents so.........

The task force info was in the latest monthly bulletin a few days ago. They probably should have done a stand alone post, but look in there.

Yeah, that post was a week ago, after the WP article.