new Reade/Biden thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Please don’t take Biden out of the race. At least not before the debates.

How could you possibly deny the country of that sort of spectacle??

Good call. Must-watch TV.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

This is really what it boils down to. Even Democrats know how hypocritical they are; they just refuse to admit it.

You just don't get it.

Nobody ever said every woman should be BELIEVED. It's ridiculous to say you believe every woman. Just like men, some women lie.

Many feminists say every woman should be HEARD. Then we can decide if we believe them.

Nobody ever said “every woman should be believed” ??

OMG are you delusional. And the photos (plus history) prove just how wrong you are.

Tons of people said it. The media maniacally repeated it.

You either have dementia or a serious problem with being honest, PP.

You're the one with a problem with honesty. (In addition to your problem with incontinence of the mouth--stop insulting people if you want to seem credible.)

It's always been about hearing women out. Sure, a few actresses and fringy types might talk about believing. But you guys (just you?) have been challenged several times already to come up with somebody with actual political or legal power who said "believe." And? You've come up with some pics staffers taped to their windows. You've come up with Hirono-until 18:03 pointed out that Hirono had a caveat, "if their story is credible."

Stop misrepresenting.

OMG - could you be more ignorant?

You seriously have no clue WHERE those photos are from, do you?

It’s the SENATE HART building, you dishonest moron!

Those are senate offices, not the (as you put it) “fringy types” or “actresses” (nice sexist, misogynistic spin there, BTW).

Is that you, Chris Dodd?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

This is really what it boils down to. Even Democrats know how hypocritical they are; they just refuse to admit it.

You just don't get it.

Nobody ever said every woman should be BELIEVED. It's ridiculous to say you believe every woman. Just like men, some women lie.

Many feminists say every woman should be HEARD. Then we can decide if we believe them.

Nobody ever said “every woman should be believed” ??

OMG are you delusional. And the photos (plus history) prove just how wrong you are.

Tons of people said it. The media maniacally repeated it.

You either have dementia or a serious problem with being honest, PP.

You're the one with a problem with honesty. (In addition to your problem with incontinence of the mouth--stop insulting people if you want to seem credible.)

It's always been about hearing women out. Sure, a few actresses and fringy types might talk about believing. But you guys (just you?) have been challenged several times already to come up with somebody with actual political or legal power who said "believe." And? You've come up with some pics staffers taped to their windows. You've come up with Hirono-until 18:03 pointed out that Hirono had a caveat, "if their story is credible."

Stop misrepresenting.

OMG - could you be more ignorant?

You seriously have no clue WHERE those photos are from, do you?

It’s the SENATE HART building, you dishonest moron!

Those are senate offices, not the (as you put it) “fringy types” or “actresses” (nice sexist, misogynistic spin there, BTW).

Is that you, Chris Dodd?

Of course I knew it was the Hart building. I worked on the Hill--in the early 90s, as it happens.

Stop deflecting. Give us a bunch of actual politicians. Not staffers. Not one politician who says "belief" once and sounds reasonable otherwise, who you try to make the avatar for all Dems.

And when you're done, address the nonprofit theft issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

This is really what it boils down to. Even Democrats know how hypocritical they are; they just refuse to admit it.

You just don't get it.

Nobody ever said every woman should be BELIEVED. It's ridiculous to say you believe every woman. Just like men, some women lie.

Many feminists say every woman should be HEARD. Then we can decide if we believe them.

Nobody ever said “every woman should be believed” ??

OMG are you delusional. And the photos (plus history) prove just how wrong you are.

Tons of people said it. The media maniacally repeated it.

You either have dementia or a serious problem with being honest, PP.

You're the one with a problem with honesty. (In addition to your problem with incontinence of the mouth--stop insulting people if you want to seem credible.)

It's always been about hearing women out. Sure, a few actresses and fringy types might talk about believing. But you guys (just you?) have been challenged several times already to come up with somebody with actual political or legal power who said "believe." And? You've come up with some pics staffers taped to their windows. You've come up with Hirono-until 18:03 pointed out that Hirono had a caveat, "if their story is credible."

Stop misrepresenting.

OMG - could you be more ignorant?

You seriously have no clue WHERE those photos are from, do you?

It’s the SENATE HART building, you dishonest moron!

Those are senate offices, not the (as you put it) “fringy types” or “actresses” (nice sexist, misogynistic spin there, BTW).

Is that you, Chris Dodd?

Of course I knew it was the Hart building. I worked on the Hill--in the early 90s, as it happens.

Stop deflecting. Give us a bunch of actual politicians. Not staffers. Not one politician who says "belief" once and sounds reasonable otherwise, who you try to make the avatar for all Dems.

And when you're done, address the nonprofit theft issue.

DP. Why does it have to be "politicians". Heck there was a believeallwomen hashtag frenzy in 2018. You can buy "believe all women" patches on Amazon. Etc, etc.

Talk about deflecting...what does the nonprofit theft allegation have to do with the Dems "believe all women" hypocrisy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

This is really what it boils down to. Even Democrats know how hypocritical they are; they just refuse to admit it.

You just don't get it.

Nobody ever said every woman should be BELIEVED. It's ridiculous to say you believe every woman. Just like men, some women lie.

Many feminists say every woman should be HEARD. Then we can decide if we believe them.

Nobody ever said “every woman should be believed” ??

OMG are you delusional. And the photos (plus history) prove just how wrong you are.

Tons of people said it. The media maniacally repeated it.

You either have dementia or a serious problem with being honest, PP.

You're the one with a problem with honesty. (In addition to your problem with incontinence of the mouth--stop insulting people if you want to seem credible.)

It's always been about hearing women out. Sure, a few actresses and fringy types might talk about believing. But you guys (just you?) have been challenged several times already to come up with somebody with actual political or legal power who said "believe." And? You've come up with some pics staffers taped to their windows. You've come up with Hirono-until 18:03 pointed out that Hirono had a caveat, "if their story is credible."

Stop misrepresenting.

OMG - could you be more ignorant?

You seriously have no clue WHERE those photos are from, do you?

It’s the SENATE HART building, you dishonest moron!

Those are senate offices, not the (as you put it) “fringy types” or “actresses” (nice sexist, misogynistic spin there, BTW).

Is that you, Chris Dodd?

Of course I knew it was the Hart building. I worked on the Hill--in the early 90s, as it happens.

Stop deflecting. Give us a bunch of actual politicians. Not staffers. Not one politician who says "belief" once and sounds reasonable otherwise, who you try to make the avatar for all Dems.

And when you're done, address the nonprofit theft issue.

DP. Why does it have to be "politicians". Heck there was a believeallwomen hashtag frenzy in 2018. You can buy "believe all women" patches on Amazon. Etc, etc.

Talk about deflecting...what does the nonprofit theft allegation have to do with the Dems "believe all women" hypocrisy?

Because some Democrats saying it does not mean that all Democrats are forever bound by it. Can I assume you are bound by everything every Republican has ever said? Bonus points if I can buy a patch on Amazon?

[Anonymous]

What were Biden staffers recently looking for at the University of Delaware?

That would account for Joe’s prolonged silence on the rape charges.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
What were Biden staffers recently looking for at the University of Delaware?

That would account for Joe’s prolonged silence on the rape charges.

What items were Tara hiding under the tablecloth at the pregnant horse rescue raffle? What was her horse treated for, that she sent the bill to the nonprofit for?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
What were Biden staffers recently looking for at the University of Delaware?

That would account for Joe’s prolonged silence on the rape charges.

Good question.
Probably, anything that might be damning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Because some Democrats saying it does not mean that all Democrats are forever bound by it. Can I assume you are bound by everything every Republican has ever said? Bonus points if I can buy a patch on Amazon?

This x1000. Are you ready to own these people in Illinois and Michigan as representing all conservatives?

Conservatives do signs too, and her sign is literally a Nazi slogan: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EW9O98yWoAE4U1Y?format=jpg&name=large

And this dude

[Anonymous]

Do you really think the guy who repeatedly apologized for going past his time limit at the debates is the guy who brazenly and aggressively assaults a young woman in an open corridor?

These are two different psychological profiles. One is a strict rule follower. One is a self-absorbed aggressor.

Joe is not an aggressive or self-absorbed person.

Yes, we start out wanting to believe women, especially when we know they will be subject to scrutiny. Who would bring that upon themselves willingly, if they weren't telling the truth? But, we know from other past situations, there are some accusers who have lied (Duke Lacrosse, Susan Smith, etc). So we start with the assumption the woman is telling the truth and we weigh her statements against any other evidence we have.

More and more, there are fishy things about Tara Reade and her story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Do you really think the guy who repeatedly apologized for going past his time limit at the debates is the guy who brazenly and aggressively assaults a young woman in an open corridor?

These are two different psychological profiles. One is a strict rule follower. One is a self-absorbed aggressor.

Joe is not an aggressive or self-absorbed person.

Yes, we start out wanting to believe women, especially when we know they will be subject to scrutiny. Who would bring that upon themselves willingly, if they weren't telling the truth? But, we know from other past situations, there are some accusers who have lied (Duke Lacrosse, Susan Smith, etc). So we start with the assumption the woman is telling the truth and we weigh her statements against any other evidence we have.

More and more, there are fishy things about Tara Reade and her story.

LOL. Thank you, resident DCUM psychologist.
If he were such a "rule follower," he would recognize personal boundaries and not repeatedly invade them. Also, rule breakers don't plagiarize.

The reason he "apologized" for going over the time limit in the debate is because he recognizes that his performance was less than stellar and wanted to "give up the mic." He was uncomfortable and couldn't wait til his turn was over.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Do you really think the guy who repeatedly apologized for going past his time limit at the debates is the guy who brazenly and aggressively assaults a young woman in an open corridor?

These are two different psychological profiles. One is a strict rule follower. One is a self-absorbed aggressor.

Joe is not an aggressive or self-absorbed person.

Yes, we start out wanting to believe women, especially when we know they will be subject to scrutiny. Who would bring that upon themselves willingly, if they weren't telling the truth? But, we know from other past situations, there are some accusers who have lied (Duke Lacrosse, Susan Smith, etc). So we start with the assumption the woman is telling the truth and we weigh her statements against any other evidence we have.

More and more, there are fishy things about Tara Reade and her story.

Please. He is a life long politician. By definition, he is self-absorbed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
What were Biden staffers recently looking for at the University of Delaware?

That would account for Joe’s prolonged silence on the rape charges.

Good question.
Probably, anything that might be damning.

Exactly. I believe HER. Joe is a self-absorbed egomaniac.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
What were Biden staffers recently looking for at the University of Delaware?

That would account for Joe’s prolonged silence on the rape charges.

Good question.
Probably, anything that might be damning.

Exactly. I believe HER. Joe is a self-absorbed egomaniac.

According to the pregnant horse nonprofit owner, Tara pretty much is too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Do you really think the guy who repeatedly apologized for going past his time limit at the debates is the guy who brazenly and aggressively assaults a young woman in an open corridor?

These are two different psychological profiles. One is a strict rule follower. One is a self-absorbed aggressor.

Joe is not an aggressive or self-absorbed person.

Yes, we start out wanting to believe women, especially when we know they will be subject to scrutiny. Who would bring that upon themselves willingly, if they weren't telling the truth? But, we know from other past situations, there are some accusers who have lied (Duke Lacrosse, Susan Smith, etc). So we start with the assumption the woman is telling the truth and we weigh her statements against any other evidence we have.

More and more, there are fishy things about Tara Reade and her story.

+1
Especially the fact that it benefits the Russipublicans. Literally - this is just the Ukraine blackmail all over again. This is the GOP playbook for the next few months. Her story has shifted multiple times, she clearly identifies with Russia politically, people can be paid to share “stories.” This is just GOP ratfcking and given the rapist they all support? I don’t believe or trust them. Enjoy the bike you’re choking on, magats. You guys are lower than dirt.