The New America: Elite Privates forever out of reach for UMC?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I am leaning towards paying for a good state college and then giving both my kids 200-300k each to help with down payments in swanky areas. I mean Ivy league is ultimately about affording a good lifestyle and that can be achieved without an Ivy league. My H and I both went to Public schools and universities, we live In McLean, make pretty much the same or more that my Ivy league neighbors. In my mind their Ivy league didn't achieve anything which my public university didn't (maybe bragging rights but I couldn't care less about that).

Also, a med degree from an okay school will be worth a LOT more than a liberal arts degree form HYP. Anybody else think like this or is this too simplistic?


some people do, some people don't. hopefully you have enough of a sense of self worth to chart your own path, based on what you think, and follow it.


Well, it's true that someone with a med degree from an average medical school will outearn the Ivy student who decides to become a teacher or librarian. And there's nothing to prevent the student at the cheaper state school from becoming as well educated as the Ivy student.

So there's a valid point there. No one should measure their self-worth by having gone to an Ivy. It's four years and for most grads, does little to help the long term outcomes.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:As I said upthread, this thread is revealing a lot of people who grew up well-off enough to think they were entitled to the best school they could get into and are horrified to discover they have to be rich themselves to give their kids that same reality. Those of us who didn't grow up rich aren't shocked by this reality.


You call it entitlement, others see it as frustration. Something that was affordable, or more affordable, to one generation is far less so for the next generation, is what causes frustration and it has nothing to do with entitlement.

Frankly, all this sneering of entitlement and privilege is only childish. You sneer at people complaining expensive private colleges aren't affordable anymore and call it entitlement, while ignoring that public/cheaper colleges are also even less affordable for the next income brackets down. So everyone is losing out one way or another, except the rich and the smart poor who figure out the system.



They were never affordable, is the point.

Listen. I grew up in a community where no one got to go to an Ivy. It did not matter how smart or hardworking they were. The #1 kid at any high school in my area with a 35 on the ACT and sports and work and volunteering did not get to go. No one went, period. I didn't think that the best kids went to Ivys, I thought "coastal elites" did. It's clear from this thread that those coastal elites thought they should get to go because they earned their spot, not because their parents could buy them their spot, and are mad that they can't also buy their kids a spot. Sorry, expensive stuff is expensive.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Not PP, but a substantial number of my HS friends, in the mixed-SES town I grew up, in attended top-20 schools: Harvard, Yale, Brown, Williams, Amherst, Dartmouth - those are the names I recall off the top of my head.

In our generation (I'm 58yo), the cost of attendance could be covered from savings, current income, the student's summer earnings, work study, and some modest loans. E.g. the expensive private SLAC I attended cost about $8,000 when I started in 1979, and I contributed about 25% of that from my summer and school-year work. Proportionally, a student today would have to contribute almost $25,000 to make the same dent in the same school's costs.

Adjusted for inflation, $8,000.00 in 1979 is equal to $29,687.80 in 2019. But that school now costs almost $75,000/year.


+1

I'm 59 and this describes the shift well.

It's really about who gets access to the elite institutions and therefore into the ruling class.


I'm in the same age bracket. My experience is that I know very successful people with community college and state college degrees. A lot of the Ivy League grads that I know honestly didn't amount to much and worked secretarial
jobs that they could have done with a high school degree. The male Ivy League grads that I know tutor for test prep companies.


I know a guy who is extremely successful who didn’t go to college but did drugs for a decade after high school. I guess that’s the best path.


Kid, I'm an Ivy grad. Two degrees when you get down to it. I'm in my 40s and after working in the professional world for 20+ years (in other words, real life) the more I came to realize an Ivy degree is nice but doesn't say much. You'd be surprised at how many Ivy grads float through life in unremarkable positions while state school grads, and not even just from the big state universities but genuine no-name local state schools in Podunkville are blossoming in their careers and making fortunes and achieving senior positions. The return on the investment for an Ivy degree over UVA or MD is minimal. If you're capable enough to go to an Ivy, you will do well in life if you apply yourself regardless of what school you went to.

This is precisely and exactly what the research shows. Which makes all of this handwringing even more silly.


That isn't what the research really shows.

https://cew.georgetown.edu/cew-reports/collegeroi/

40 year Net Present Value:

MIT $2,273,000
Stanford $2,068,000
Harvard $1,967,000
Penn $1,832,000
Yale $1,777,000
Columbia $1,769,000
Princeton $1,642,000
Cornell $1,607,000
Dartmouth $1,561,000
Brown $1,377,000

UMD $1,330,000
UVA $1,291,000
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:As I said upthread, this thread is revealing a lot of people who grew up well-off enough to think they were entitled to the best school they could get into and are horrified to discover they have to be rich themselves to give their kids that same reality. Those of us who didn't grow up rich aren't shocked by this reality.


You call it entitlement, others see it as frustration. Something that was affordable, or more affordable, to one generation is far less so for the next generation, is what causes frustration and it has nothing to do with entitlement.

Frankly, all this sneering of entitlement and privilege is only childish. You sneer at people complaining expensive private colleges aren't affordable anymore and call it entitlement, while ignoring that public/cheaper colleges are also even less affordable for the next income brackets down. So everyone is losing out one way or another, except the rich and the smart poor who figure out the system.



They were never affordable, is the point.

Listen. I grew up in a community where no one got to go to an Ivy. It did not matter how smart or hardworking they were. The #1 kid at any high school in my area with a 35 on the ACT and sports and work and volunteering did not get to go. No one went, period. I didn't think that the best kids went to Ivys, I thought "coastal elites" did. It's clear from this thread that those coastal elites thought they should get to go because they earned their spot, not because their parents could buy them their spot, and are mad that they can't also buy their kids a spot. Sorry, expensive stuff is expensive.


And I grew up in a community where high performers did get to go to Ivy League schools. They also went to places like William, Amherst, and Bowdoin. When I graduated from high school in 1980, we all worked summer jobs in restaurants, at the swimming pool, etc., and our summer earnings made a significant dent in the expenses of our private colleges. Most of us took out student loans, but they were negligible relative to the overall cost.

I grew up in Massachusetts in a very mixed income town. We were definitely not “coastal elites,“ but we were aware of the differences among various schools and what it took to get in and pay for them.

At that time, the mantra was, “if you can get into a given school, there will be a way to pay for it.“ That is just no longer the case. That is what people are frustrated by. It has nothing to do with entitlement, it is frustration at the way that our society seems to have evolved into another gilded age, following an era in which we could all work hard, apply to, and enjoy the benefits of an education at elite institutions.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Not PP, but a substantial number of my HS friends, in the mixed-SES town I grew up, in attended top-20 schools: Harvard, Yale, Brown, Williams, Amherst, Dartmouth - those are the names I recall off the top of my head.

In our generation (I'm 58yo), the cost of attendance could be covered from savings, current income, the student's summer earnings, work study, and some modest loans. E.g. the expensive private SLAC I attended cost about $8,000 when I started in 1979, and I contributed about 25% of that from my summer and school-year work. Proportionally, a student today would have to contribute almost $25,000 to make the same dent in the same school's costs.

Adjusted for inflation, $8,000.00 in 1979 is equal to $29,687.80 in 2019. But that school now costs almost $75,000/year.


+1

I'm 59 and this describes the shift well.

It's really about who gets access to the elite institutions and therefore into the ruling class.


I'm in the same age bracket. My experience is that I know very successful people with community college and state college degrees. A lot of the Ivy League grads that I know honestly didn't amount to much and worked secretarial
jobs that they could have done with a high school degree. The male Ivy League grads that I know tutor for test prep companies.


I know a guy who is extremely successful who didn’t go to college but did drugs for a decade after high school. I guess that’s the best path.


Kid, I'm an Ivy grad. Two degrees when you get down to it. I'm in my 40s and after working in the professional world for 20+ years (in other words, real life) the more I came to realize an Ivy degree is nice but doesn't say much. You'd be surprised at how many Ivy grads float through life in unremarkable positions while state school grads, and not even just from the big state universities but genuine no-name local state schools in Podunkville are blossoming in their careers and making fortunes and achieving senior positions. The return on the investment for an Ivy degree over UVA or MD is minimal. If you're capable enough to go to an Ivy, you will do well in life if you apply yourself regardless of what school you went to.

This is precisely and exactly what the research shows. Which makes all of this handwringing even more silly.


That isn't what the research really shows.

https://cew.georgetown.edu/cew-reports/collegeroi/

40 year Net Present Value:

MIT $2,273,000
Stanford $2,068,000
Harvard $1,967,000
Penn $1,832,000
Yale $1,777,000
Columbia $1,769,000
Princeton $1,642,000
Cornell $1,607,000
Dartmouth $1,561,000
Brown $1,377,000

UMD $1,330,000
UVA $1,291,000


It is what the research shows when you control for students entering statistics.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Not PP, but a substantial number of my HS friends, in the mixed-SES town I grew up, in attended top-20 schools: Harvard, Yale, Brown, Williams, Amherst, Dartmouth - those are the names I recall off the top of my head.

In our generation (I'm 58yo), the cost of attendance could be covered from savings, current income, the student's summer earnings, work study, and some modest loans. E.g. the expensive private SLAC I attended cost about $8,000 when I started in 1979, and I contributed about 25% of that from my summer and school-year work. Proportionally, a student today would have to contribute almost $25,000 to make the same dent in the same school's costs.

Adjusted for inflation, $8,000.00 in 1979 is equal to $29,687.80 in 2019. But that school now costs almost $75,000/year.


+1

I'm 59 and this describes the shift well.

It's really about who gets access to the elite institutions and therefore into the ruling class.


I'm in the same age bracket. My experience is that I know very successful people with community college and state college degrees. A lot of the Ivy League grads that I know honestly didn't amount to much and worked secretarial
jobs that they could have done with a high school degree. The male Ivy League grads that I know tutor for test prep companies.


I know a guy who is extremely successful who didn’t go to college but did drugs for a decade after high school. I guess that’s the best path.


Kid, I'm an Ivy grad. Two degrees when you get down to it. I'm in my 40s and after working in the professional world for 20+ years (in other words, real life) the more I came to realize an Ivy degree is nice but doesn't say much. You'd be surprised at how many Ivy grads float through life in unremarkable positions while state school grads, and not even just from the big state universities but genuine no-name local state schools in Podunkville are blossoming in their careers and making fortunes and achieving senior positions. The return on the investment for an Ivy degree over UVA or MD is minimal. If you're capable enough to go to an Ivy, you will do well in life if you apply yourself regardless of what school you went to.

This is precisely and exactly what the research shows. Which makes all of this handwringing even more silly.


That isn't what the research really shows.

https://cew.georgetown.edu/cew-reports/collegeroi/

40 year Net Present Value:

MIT $2,273,000
Stanford $2,068,000
Harvard $1,967,000
Penn $1,832,000
Yale $1,777,000
Columbia $1,769,000
Princeton $1,642,000
Cornell $1,607,000
Dartmouth $1,561,000
Brown $1,377,000

UMD $1,330,000
UVA $1,291,000


It is what the research shows when you control for students entering statistics.


Not sure about that either. Here is value add analysis where the stat of entering students and the mix of majors is controlled for in "Expected Earnings". Value add is the difference between expected and actual median earnings. https://cew.georgetown.edu/cew-reports/college-rankings/

Rank Institution State Median Earnings Expected Earnings Over/Under
3 Harvard University MA $87,200 $67,000 $20,200
5 Stanford University CA $80,900 $63,900 $17,000
7 Massachusetts Institute of Technology MA $91,600 $75,900 $15,700
9 University of Pennsylvania PA $78,200 $63,800 $14,400
57 Princeton University NJ $75,100 $66,000 $9,100
78 Cornell University NY $70,900 $62,600 $8,300
83 Columbia University in the City of New York NY $72,900 $64,600 $8,300
178 Yale University CT $66,000 $60,000 $6,000
255 Dartmouth College NH $67,100 $62,300 $4,800
790 University of Maryland-College Park MD $59,100 $59,600 -$500
845 Brown University RI $59,700 $60,700 -$1,000
997 University of Virginia-Main Campus VA $58,600 $61,000 -$2,400
post reply Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: