This Girl Scout cookie typifies my horrible marriage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a cookie mom, troop leader, and wife of a man who fucked up my cookie inventory beyond recognition last year by treating it as his own personal snack supply (which resulted in my complete and utter meltdown after taking a redeye home from a work trip), this thread hits so close to home.

Are you going to yell at him again about it tonight? I don't think it's out of line.
Your post makes me a little afraid of you (in a "you sound awesome" kind of way)

Ha! He got one good yelling at and now knows not to incite my wrath

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know why I'm laughing at this.

I'm trying to imagine what a marriage must be like where you just got bat shit crazy on your husband for screwing up the delivery of cookies.

I don't think I've ever yelled at my husband (except maybe in labor).

+1. I yell at my husband all the time but not for stupid crap like this. DCUM is putting way too much thought into cookie delivery. It's for the Girl Scouts- no one expects the orders to turn out perfectly. They're kids and it's a fundraiser. It's not a crisis if someone screws up a cookie order. And it certainly doesn't reflect badly on the family. Jeez!

Most people are expecting the cookies that they ordered and paid for. I'd would not assume a screw-up, especially when there's clearly an adult in charge.

I order cookies from everyone that shows up. and I don't really care if they never show up or if I get extra.

get a life women.

You don't deliver my do si dos and we will have words at minimum

I heart you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:ok how did they know which houses to go to at all without a list? And if they did have a list, did they simply skip a few houses? Seems like a pretty easy fix, just look back at the list. Did they only deliver partial orders to some of the customers? Seems unlikely, as each customer would want to verify they got their desired cookies as they were handed over.

Did they not check off each box from each order as it was delivered?

Did your husband perhaps pick up more boxes than he ordered?

I think the only (and obvious) answer is that either he failed to check off which houses he delivered to (and missed some), or he misread lines and delivered mrs. Smith's smaller order to Mr. Jones, possibly more than once. Smart money is on the first option--having delivered cookies more than once, there is absolutely no way you get them all delivered on the first go-round. People are never he and you have to go back repeatedly. Lesson is to make sure you get a legible phone number for all orders (so you can call and say "your cookies are in, when would be a convenient time to deliver them?") And absolutely positively check them off as you deliver them. Without that simple step, there is just no f-ing way to fix it unless you go back to each house and interview them (and good luck with that.

[Anonymous]

Hummm... isn't it the GIRLS responsibility to deliver this stuff? It is her organization and its about teaching her responsibility. Why is the father on the hook? IF the girl doesn't do it right then its a learning experience for her. I really think all the cookiemomsters are missing the whole point of Girlscouts. They treat it like it is their social club and taking over the work the children are intended to do. Kids don't learn anything if they are not the ones doing the activity. too often the girls simply get carried around while the parents do the activity for them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The title of this thread made me expect that OP would describe a marriage that was withering like stale Samoas, or crumbling like smashed Savannah Smiles ...

Me too!!

Or just sitting there with no interest -- like all the leftover Rah Rah Raisins that no one ever buys...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is the sign up sheet with everyone's name and what they ordered?

From the sound of things, it's probably just a sheet of construction paper upon which OP's husband hastily scrawled "COOKIEEESSSSS" in crayon.

I believe this is the case.

Yep, never let the inmates run the asylum.

OP's biggest mistake. Give him a little bit of allowance each week, washable markers in case he marks up the walls...that kind of thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hummm... isn't it the GIRLS responsibility to deliver this stuff? It is her organization and its about teaching her responsibility. Why is the father on the hook? IF the girl doesn't do it right then its a learning experience for her. I really think all the cookiemomsters are missing the whole point of Girlscouts. They treat it like it is their social club and taking over the work the children are intended to do. Kids don't learn anything if they are not the ones doing the activity. too often the girls simply get carried around while the parents do the activity for them.

The cookies aren't free and real money is paid for them. The cookie sales are a fun learning opportunity for the girls - but it is an adult supervised learning opportunity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hummm... isn't it the GIRLS responsibility to deliver this stuff? It is her organization and its about teaching her responsibility. Why is the father on the hook? IF the girl doesn't do it right then its a learning experience for her. I really think all the cookiemomsters are missing the whole point of Girlscouts. They treat it like it is their social club and taking over the work the children are intended to do. Kids don't learn anything if they are not the ones doing the activity. too often the girls simply get carried around while the parents do the activity for them.

The cookies aren't free and real money is paid for them. The cookie sales are a fun learning opportunity for the girls - but it is an adult supervised learning opportunity.

Key word "supervised" not done for them by the adults. Again, cookiemomster improperly blames the husband. I remember when I was a kid doing these sorts of fund raisers. I remember one time there was a mistake with the order. I was terrified to go to that house and explain what happened. It was such a big deal to me as an 8 year old. My parents didn't do it for me. The school didn't do it for me. I had to go there and ask the woman if she wanted to accept the stuff even though the order was wrong. She said no. I had to work it out with the school myself. My parents were not involved at all. I delivered the stuff using my bike.

Why the heck are you parents even involved in this stuff. You children are learning nothing.

[Anonymous]

I agree. Doing the work for the kids even in the name of "supervision" cheats the children of dealing with problems and solving those sorts of real-world problems. The kids need to learn to keep track of the money. To take an order and remember where to deliver it. They need to be responsible for those sorts of things. Problems will happen and the kids will be freaked out but then they will figure out how to resolve the issue. The purpose isn't to "sell cookies" the purpose is for the kids to deal with problems that have real-world consequences. Sheltering kids from that doesn't help them.

Example... my 13 year old took an order from the boy-scouts one day and didn't tell me about it. When the boy scouts came back I wasn't home and the 13 year old was on the hook for paying the boy-scouts for popcorn. Apparently there was some sort of miscommunication and the boy-scouts wanted $60 for a case of popcorn. My 13 year old was a little freaked out but he went into his wallet and paid for the order. When I got home he told me what happened. I looked at him and said "I'm sorry that happened to you.... what did you learn?" He said "not to order popcorn from the boy-scouts" I laughed and asked "what else?" she shrugged his shoulders and so I explained to him (1) he broke the rules about opening the door for people and (2) that when he places an order to double check the order to make sure it is correct and to get a price in advance. It was a learning experience for him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As a cookie mom, troop leader, and wife of a man who fucked up my cookie inventory beyond recognition last year by treating it as his own personal snack supply (which resulted in my complete and utter meltdown after taking a redeye home from a work trip), this thread hits so close to home.

This is insane! Even my two year old would be able to stay out of a box of stuff if I told her to. Literally the only domestic being I can think of that wouldn't be able to understand no in a situation like this is a dog. Did he not understand that the cookies were for GS orders? Or did he think the entire supply, which I assume was quite large, were the "leftovers"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I agree. Doing the work for the kids even in the name of "supervision" cheats the children of dealing with problems and solving those sorts of real-world problems. The kids need to learn to keep track of the money. To take an order and remember where to deliver it. They need to be responsible for those sorts of things. Problems will happen and the kids will be freaked out but then they will figure out how to resolve the issue. The purpose isn't to "sell cookies" the purpose is for the kids to deal with problems that have real-world consequences. Sheltering kids from that doesn't help them.

Example... my 13 year old took an order from the boy-scouts one day and didn't tell me about it. When the boy scouts came back I wasn't home and the 13 year old was on the hook for paying the boy-scouts for popcorn. Apparently there was some sort of miscommunication and the boy-scouts wanted $60 for a case of popcorn. My 13 year old was a little freaked out but he went into his wallet and paid for the order. When I got home he told me what happened. I looked at him and said "I'm sorry that happened to you.... what did you learn?" He said "not to order popcorn from the boy-scouts" I laughed and asked "what else?" she shrugged his shoulders and so I explained to him (1) he broke the rules about opening the door for people and (2) that when he places an order to double check the order to make sure it is correct and to get a price in advance. It was a learning experience for him.

Your 13 year old isn't allowed to open the door when you aren't home?

[Anonymous]

Anyone else disappointed that this isn't 18 pages of witty metaphors of how my marriage resembles a Girl Scout cookie? Or maybe I missed that part.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone else disappointed that this isn't 18 pages of witty metaphors of how my marriage resembles a Girl Scout cookie? Or maybe I missed that part.

Yes, you missed a handful of people saying what you just said.

To be fair, this thread is (an awesome) 18 pages now... #KeepCookiesAlive!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hummm... isn't it the GIRLS responsibility to deliver this stuff? It is her organization and its about teaching her responsibility. Why is the father on the hook? IF the girl doesn't do it right then its a learning experience for her. I really think all the cookiemomsters are missing the whole point of Girlscouts. They treat it like it is their social club and taking over the work the children are intended to do. Kids don't learn anything if they are not the ones doing the activity. too often the girls simply get carried around while the parents do the activity for them.

Bless your heart.

[Anonymous]

The kid is 7-years-old. Is a 7-year-old really supposed to be able to handle this on her own. Why not just give her the keys to the car and a calculator and blame her for the errors.