MCPS is cuttting compacted math and cohorted literacy enrichment

[Anonymous]

Oh man, did Montoya leave too? I was looking forward to hearing her criticize the literacy enrichment switch.

[Anonymous]

They can't adjourn the meeting because Silvestre left the room!

[Anonymous]

And we're done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The level of disrespect for teachers from Central Office is absolutely appalling

THIS! Elementary teachers need to come together on this. It’s just not doable with the new curriculum. Give them a year to learn it before they are expected to differentiate for 3-4 levels. Even then, get their feedback first.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Grace is horrible

She was much stronger on this when she was first talking, but apparently she hates Montoya enough that the fact that Montoya opposes it means she has to support it now...

I like that Montoya is asking good questions..but I think it is distracting when she interrupts and asks the same question over and over again.

I'm curious if they have worked with current elementary teachers at all on this. It seems like they have wildly unrealistic expectations of the teachers. I'm also curious what data they have on how Model 2 is specifically working for gifted kids. What data do they have on kids that would have been in ELC?

They have not, and verbally confirmed that today.

I don't understand why do they hate our kids so much that they refuse to do something so basic as this?

They also hate teacher, especially ES teacher. Apparently teaching 3-level of math and 2-level CKLA everyday is a piece of cake for these CO folks.

Yep... I suspect a lot of 4th and 5th grade teachers will be running for the exits after this...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh man, did Montoya leave too? I was looking forward to hearing her criticize the literacy enrichment switch.

Everyone was too tired after the math debate. It's basically the same issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I do not understand these concerns that kids are stuck on one pathway starting grade 3. I have a 5th grader and just within her friend group one child dropped back to regular math after math 4/5 and two jumped up by taking enrichment over last summer. It really does not seem insurmountable. We are a pretty middle of the road school too.

They have lie and say the current system is inflexible tracking that the state prohibits to justify making the change.

[Anonymous]

I hope Montoya stays on top of this. I doubt anyone else will.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I do not understand these concerns that kids are stuck on one pathway starting grade 3. I have a 5th grader and just within her friend group one child dropped back to regular math after math 4/5 and two jumped up by taking enrichment over last summer. It really does not seem insurmountable. We are a pretty middle of the road school too.

The concerns are fake concerns. They just don't want to paper over the racial disparities by taking away meaningful acceleration from everyone.

Why wouldn't you at least pilot this somewhere first? Jfc

[Anonymous]

This is a goldmine for RSM

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I hope Montoya stays on top of this. I doubt anyone else will.

I think Yang will too. The problem is unless they pass some sort of directive/resolution, MCPS gets to do what they want in terms of implementation. The Board doesn't have much control here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I hope Montoya stays on top of this. I doubt anyone else will.

One lone board member can't do anything. She needs four board members to make things happen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do not understand these concerns that kids are stuck on one pathway starting grade 3. I have a 5th grader and just within her friend group one child dropped back to regular math after math 4/5 and two jumped up by taking enrichment over last summer. It really does not seem insurmountable. We are a pretty middle of the road school too.

The concerns are fake concerns. They just don't want to paper over the racial disparities by taking away meaningful acceleration from everyone.

Why wouldn't you at least pilot this somewhere first? Jfc

Same question was raised for CKLA and for regional model. That's what I said: TT and Nikki Porter are both excellent at dismantling everything!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I hope Montoya stays on top of this. I doubt anyone else will.

We'll see whether she loses some of that fire after being told mid-presentation that her 4th grader gets to be the last class cohorted in 5th, or if she stays equally committed to the broader principles. I hope it's the latter.

[Anonymous]

MCPS used to be a recommended district for gifted students. Next up is whatever they're going to end up doing to the CES program. And then what?

I truly don't want to send my kid to private school nor do I want to move, but I may well have to to keep her engaged in school.